Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, 10 Merton Street, Oxford OX1 4JJ, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 5;367(1599):2234-44. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0125.
The New Thinking contained in this volume rejects an Evolutionary Psychology that is committed to innate domain-specific psychological mechanisms: gene-based adaptations that are unlearnt, developmentally fixed and culturally universal. But the New Thinking does not simply deny the importance of innate psychological traits. The problem runs deeper: the concept of innateness is not suited to distinguishing between the New Thinking and Evolutionary Psychology. That points to a more serious problem with the concept of innateness as it is applied to human psychological phenotypes. This paper argues that the features of recent human evolution highlighted by the New Thinking imply that the concept of inherited representation, set out here, is a better tool for theorizing about human cognitive evolution.
基于基因的适应,这些适应是无法学习的、发育固定的和文化普遍的。但是,新思维并不是简单地否定先天心理特征的重要性。问题更深层次:先天概念不适合区分新思维和进化心理学。这指向了一个更严重的问题,即先天概念在应用于人类心理表型时存在的问题。本文认为,新思维所强调的最近人类进化的特征意味着,这里所阐述的遗传表现概念是一个更好的理论工具,用于探讨人类认知进化。