Cognitive Neuroscience Sector, SISSA, Trieste, Italy.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;28(7):500-14; discussion 515-20. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.674012.
The paper addresses a weakness in the Schwartz and Dell paper (2010)-namely, its discussion of the inclusion criteria for case series. The paper distinguishes the different types that exist and how they constrain the theoretical conclusions that one can draw about the organization of the normal cognitive system. Four different types of inclusion criteria are considered. Two are those treated by Schwartz and Dell-namely, theoretically derived clinical criteria, such as the example of semantic dementia, and broad clinical criteria such as the presence of aphasia. In addition, in the present paper two different types of anatomically based criteria are assessed-those using anatomical regions selected a priori and also regions selected as a result of an anatomical group study analysis. Putative functional syndromes are argued to be the empirical building blocks for cognitive neuropsychology. Anatomically based case series can aid in their construction or in their fractionation.
本文针对 Schwartz 和 Dell 论文(2010 年)中的一个弱点——即对病例系列纳入标准的讨论。本文区分了存在的不同类型,以及它们如何限制人们对正常认知系统组织的理论结论。考虑了四种不同类型的纳入标准。其中两种是 Schwartz 和 Dell 所处理的——即基于理论推导的临床标准,例如语义痴呆的例子,以及广泛的临床标准,例如失语症的存在。此外,本文还评估了两种不同类型的基于解剖的标准——即使用预先选择的解剖区域和基于解剖组研究分析选择的区域。假定的功能综合征被认为是认知神经心理学的经验构建块。基于解剖的病例系列可以帮助构建或细分它们。