Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, 34th and Charles Streets, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2011 Oct;28(7):435-44. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.697453.
Schwartz and Dell (2010) advocated for a major role for case series investigations in cognitive neuropsychology. They defined the key features of this approach and presented a number of arguments and examples illustrating the benefits of case series studies and their contribution to computational cognitive neuropsychology. In the Special Issue on "Case Series in Cognitive Neuropsychology" there are six commentaries on Schwartz and Dell as well as a response to the six commentaries by Dell and Schwartz (2011 this issue). In this paper, I provide a brief summary of the key points made in Schwartz and Dell, and I review the promise and perils of case series design as revealed by the six commentaries. I conclude by placing the set of papers within a broader perspective, providing some clarification of the historical record on case series and single-case approaches, raising some cautionary notes for case series studies and situating both case series and single-case approaches within the larger context of theory development in the cognitive sciences.
施瓦茨和戴尔(2010)提倡在认知神经心理学中充分发挥病例系列研究的作用。他们定义了这种方法的关键特征,并提出了一些论点和例子,说明了病例系列研究的益处及其对计算认知神经心理学的贡献。在“认知神经心理学中的病例系列”特刊中,有六篇评论文章对施瓦茨和戴尔的观点进行了评论,戴尔和施瓦茨(2011 年本期刊)也对这六篇评论文章做出了回应。在本文中,我简要总结了施瓦茨和戴尔提出的要点,并回顾了六篇评论文章揭示的病例系列设计的前景和风险。最后,我将这些论文置于更广泛的背景下,对病例系列和单病例方法的历史记录进行了一些澄清,对病例系列研究提出了一些警示,并将病例系列和单病例方法置于认知科学理论发展的更大背景下。