School of Nursing, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2012 Sep;15(9):978-83. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0536. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
Reports from the Institute of Medicine and American Medical Association's Pain and Palliative Medicine Specialty Section Council emphasize the need for pain management education in medical schools, yet training in pediatric pain management (PPM) is limited. In this pilot program, we evaluated the effectiveness of a web-based PPM module on knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and self-reported skills in medical students.
Third- and fourth-year medical students (n = 291) completed the module and a knowledge test. Of these students, 53 completed a pre- and postsurvey of confidence, attitudes, and self-reported skills and module evaluation.
For the 291 students, knowledge scores increased significantly by 21.8 points (95% confidence interval [CI] = 19.7-23.8; p<0.001). The majority of scores on the survey items significantly increased postmodule, including: increase in confidence in assessing pain in pediatric patients (6% to 25%; p = 0.004), increase in responses of "strongly disagree" or "disagree" to the belief that opioids will delay diagnosis (62% to 85%; p = 0.005), and increase in responses of "frequently" or "very frequently" to "how often do you use behavioral instruments to assess pain severity?" (35% to 57%; p = 0.008). The majority reported they intend to make changes in behavior or practice (71%), and would recommend the module to fellow students (88%).
This pilot program supports the effectiveness of a web-based module in improving knowledge, confidence, attitudes, and self-reported skills in PPM. Evaluation responses indicate high-quality content. Further evaluation for sustained impact is warranted.
美国医学协会疼痛与姑息治疗专科分会和医学研究所的报告强调了在医学院校开展疼痛管理教育的必要性,但儿科疼痛管理(PPM)培训却很有限。在这个试点项目中,我们评估了一个基于网络的 PPM 模块在医学生知识、信心、态度和自我报告技能方面的有效性。
第三和第四年的医学生(n=291)完成了该模块和知识测试。其中,53 名学生完成了信心、态度和自我报告技能的预-后调查以及模块评估。
对于 291 名学生,知识得分显著提高了 21.8 分(95%置信区间[CI]为 19.7-23.8;p<0.001)。大多数调查项目的得分在课后显著增加,包括:评估儿科患者疼痛的信心增加(6%至 25%;p=0.004),对“使用阿片类药物会延迟诊断”这一观点的“强烈不同意”或“不同意”的比例增加(62%至 85%;p=0.005),以及“经常”或“非常经常”使用“你如何经常使用行为工具来评估疼痛严重程度?”的比例增加(35%至 57%;p=0.008)。大多数学生表示他们打算改变行为或实践(71%),并会向同学推荐该模块(88%)。
该试点项目支持基于网络的模块在提高 PPM 知识、信心、态度和自我报告技能方面的有效性。评估反馈表明内容质量高。需要进一步评估以确定其持续影响。