Department of Health Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Lund University, Sweden.
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Jul 2;12:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-90.
Physiotherapy research concerning interventions for children with CP is often focused on collecting evidence of the superiority of particular therapeutic methods or treatment modalities. Articulating and documenting the use of theory, instrumentation and research design and the assumptions underlying physiotherapy research interventions are important. Physiotherapy interventions focusing on children with Cerebral Palsy should, according to the literature, be based on a functional and environmental perspective with task-specific functional activity, motor learning processes and Family-Centred Service i.e. to enhance motor ability and improve capacity so that the child can perform the tasks necessary to participate actively in everyday life. Thus, it is important to coordinate the norms and values of the physiotherapist with those of the family and child. The aim of this study was to describe how physiotherapists' experiences physiotherapy interventions for children with CP in scientific physiotherapy publications written by physiotherapists.
A qualitative phenomenographic approach was used. Twenty- one scientific articles, found in PubMed, strategically chosen according to year of publication (2001-2009), modality, journals and country, were investigated.
Three qualitatively different descriptive categories were identified: A: Making it possible a functional-based intervention based on the biopsychosocial health paradigm, and the role of the physiotherapist as collaborative, interacting with the child and family in goal setting, intervention planning and evaluation, B: Making it work an impairment-based intervention built on a mixed health paradigm (biomedical and biopsychosocial), and the role of the physiotherapist as a coach, leading the goal setting, intervention planning and evaluation and instructing family members to carry out physiotherapist directed orders, and; C: Making it normal an impairment-based intervention built on a biomedical health paradigm, and the role of the physiotherapist as an authoritative expert who determine goals, intervention planning and evaluation.
Different paradigms of health and disability lead to different approaches to physiotherapy which influence the whole intervention process regarding strategies for the assessment and treatment, all of which influence Family-Centred Service and the child's motor learning strategies. The results may deepen physiotherapists' understanding of how different paradigms of health influence the way in which various physiotherapy approaches in research seek to solve the challenge of CP.
物理治疗学针对脑瘫儿童的干预措施的研究通常侧重于收集特定治疗方法或治疗模式优越性的证据。阐述和记录理论、仪器和研究设计的使用以及物理治疗干预措施的基本假设非常重要。根据文献,针对脑瘫儿童的物理治疗干预措施应基于功能和环境视角,采用特定任务的功能活动、运动学习过程和以家庭为中心的服务,即增强运动能力并提高能力,以使儿童能够执行积极参与日常生活所需的任务。因此,协调治疗师的规范和价值观与家庭和儿童的规范和价值观非常重要。本研究的目的是描述物理治疗师在物理治疗师撰写的科学物理治疗出版物中对脑瘫儿童进行物理治疗干预的经验。
采用定性现象学方法。根据发表年份(2001-2009 年)、模式、期刊和国家,从 PubMed 中选择了 21 篇科学文章进行策略性研究。
确定了三个定性不同的描述性类别:A:使基于生物心理社会健康范式的基于功能的干预成为可能,治疗师的角色是协作的,与孩子和家庭一起设定目标、干预计划和评估,B:使基于混合健康范式(生物医学和生物心理社会)的基于损伤的干预成为可能,治疗师的角色是教练,指导目标设定、干预计划和评估,并指导家庭成员执行治疗师指导的命令,和; C:使基于生物医学健康范式的基于损伤的干预成为正常,治疗师的角色是权威专家,决定目标、干预计划和评估。
不同的健康和残疾范式导致不同的物理治疗方法,影响评估和治疗的整个干预过程,这一切都影响以家庭为中心的服务和儿童的运动学习策略。结果可以加深治疗师对不同健康范式如何影响各种物理治疗方法在研究中寻求解决脑瘫挑战的方式的理解。