• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于努力的人类决策的药理学研究:纳曲酮和尼古丁。

Pharmacological investigations of effort-based decision-making in humans: Naltrexone and nicotine.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275027. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0275027
PMID:36197897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9534411/
Abstract

Many mental health disorders are characterized by an impaired ability, or willingness, to exert effort to obtain rewards. This impairment is modeled in effort-based decision tasks, and neuropharmacological studies implicate dopamine in this process. However, other transmitter systems such as opioidergic and cholinergic systems have received less attention. Here, in two separate studies we tested the acute effects of naltrexone and nicotine on effort-based decision-making in healthy adults. In Study 1, we compared naltrexone (50mg and 25mg) to placebo, and in Study 2, a pilot study, we compared nicotine (7mg) to placebo. In both studies, participants completed the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT), which measured effort-based decision-making related to monetary rewards. Although subjects expended greater effort for larger reward magnitude and when there was a higher probability of receiving the reward, neither naltrexone nor nicotine affected willingness to exert effort for monetary rewards. Although the drugs produced significant and typical drug effects on measures of mood and behavior, they did not alter effort-based decision-making. This has implications both for the clinical use of these drugs, as well as for understanding the neuropharmacology of effort-related behavior.

摘要

许多精神健康障碍的特点是努力获取奖励的能力或意愿受损。这种损伤在基于努力的决策任务中得到建模,神经药理学研究表明多巴胺在此过程中起作用。然而,其他递质系统,如阿片类和胆碱能系统,受到的关注较少。在这里,我们在两项独立的研究中测试了纳曲酮和尼古丁对健康成年人基于努力的决策的急性影响。在研究 1 中,我们将纳曲酮(50mg 和 25mg)与安慰剂进行了比较,在研究 2 中,一项试点研究,我们将尼古丁(7mg)与安慰剂进行了比较。在这两项研究中,参与者都完成了奖励努力支出任务(EEfRT),该任务测量了与金钱奖励相关的基于努力的决策。尽管参与者为更大的奖励幅度和更高的奖励获得概率付出了更多的努力,但纳曲酮和尼古丁都不会影响他们为金钱奖励付出努力的意愿。尽管这些药物对情绪和行为的测量产生了显著和典型的药物作用,但它们并没有改变基于努力的决策。这对这些药物的临床应用以及对努力相关行为的神经药理学理解都有影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8441/9534411/d84ec5f3fbc3/pone.0275027.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8441/9534411/98e0884ea6d5/pone.0275027.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8441/9534411/97e05699a9b2/pone.0275027.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8441/9534411/d84ec5f3fbc3/pone.0275027.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8441/9534411/98e0884ea6d5/pone.0275027.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8441/9534411/97e05699a9b2/pone.0275027.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8441/9534411/d84ec5f3fbc3/pone.0275027.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacological investigations of effort-based decision-making in humans: Naltrexone and nicotine.基于努力的人类决策的药理学研究:纳曲酮和尼古丁。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275027. eCollection 2022.
2
Amping up effort: effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making.努力加倍:安非他命对人类基于努力的决策的影响。
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 16;31(46):16597-602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4387-11.2011.
3
The cognitive effort expenditure for rewards task (C-EEfRT): A novel measure of willingness to expend cognitive effort.奖赏认知努力任务(C-EEfRT):一种衡量意愿付出认知努力的新方法。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1237-1248. doi: 10.1037/pas0000563. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
Caffeine increases psychomotor performance on the effort expenditure for rewards task.咖啡因提高了在努力付出获取奖励任务中的精神运动表现。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 Oct;102(4):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
5
Effort-based decision making varies by smoking status.基于努力的决策因吸烟状况而异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Apr;237(4):1081-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05437-3. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
6
Association between cognitive function and performance on effort based decision making in patients with major depressive disorder treated with Vortioxetine.文拉法辛治疗的重性抑郁障碍患者认知功能与基于努力的决策表现之间的关系。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;94:152113. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.07.006. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
Nicotine increases impulsivity and decreases willingness to exert cognitive effort despite improving attention in "slacker" rats: insights into cholinergic regulation of cost/benefit decision making.尼古丁会增加冲动性,并降低付出认知努力的意愿,尽管它能改善“懒惰”大鼠的注意力:对胆碱能调节成本/收益决策的见解。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 29;9(10):e111580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111580. eCollection 2014.
8
Worth the 'EEfRT'? The effort expenditure for rewards task as an objective measure of motivation and anhedonia.值得付出“EEfRT”吗?奖励任务的努力支出作为动机和快感缺失的客观测量指标。
PLoS One. 2009 Aug 12;4(8):e6598. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006598.
9
Adults with autism spectrum disorders exhibit decreased sensitivity to reward parameters when making effort-based decisions.自闭症谱系障碍的成年人在进行基于努力的决策时,对奖励参数的敏感性降低。
J Neurodev Disord. 2012 May 21;4(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1866-1955-4-13.
10
Effort-cost decision-making associated with negative symptoms in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.与精神分裂症和双相情感障碍阴性症状相关的努力-成本决策。
Behav Brain Res. 2024 Jun 5;467:114996. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2024.114996. Epub 2024 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Naltrexone dose-selectively modulates goal-directed behavior and the hypothalamic proteome in rats.纳曲酮剂量选择性地调节大鼠的目标导向行为和下丘脑蛋白质组。
Pharmacol Rep. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1007/s43440-025-00735-4.
2
Cross-species translational paradigms for assessing positive valence system as defined by the RDoC matrix.用于评估由研究领域标准矩阵(RDoC)定义的正性效价系统的跨物种转化范式。
J Neurochem. 2025 Jan;169(1):e16243. doi: 10.1111/jnc.16243. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Effects of dopamine and opioid receptor antagonism on the neural processing of social and nonsocial rewards.

本文引用的文献

1
Dose-response effects of d-amphetamine on effort-based decision-making and reinforcement learning.右旋苯丙胺对基于努力的决策和强化学习的剂量反应效应。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 May;46(6):1078-1085. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0779-8. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
2
The role of the opioid system in decision making and cognitive control: A review.阿片类系统在决策和认知控制中的作用:综述。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Jun;19(3):435-458. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00710-6.
3
Role of mu, but not delta or kappa, opioid receptors in context-induced reinstatement of oxycodone seeking.
多巴胺和阿片受体拮抗作用对社会和非社会奖励的神经加工的影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2024 Mar;45(4):e26645. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26645.
μ、δ和κ 阿片受体在环境线索诱导的氧可酮觅药行为中的作用。
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Aug;50(3):2075-2085. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13955. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
4
Dopamine, Effort-Based Choice, and Behavioral Economics: Basic and Translational Research.多巴胺、基于努力的选择与行为经济学:基础研究与转化研究
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Mar 23;12:52. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00052. eCollection 2018.
5
The alcoholic brain: neural bases of impaired reward-based decision-making in alcohol use disorders.酒精性大脑:酒精使用障碍中基于奖励的决策受损的神经基础。
Neurol Sci. 2018 Mar;39(3):423-435. doi: 10.1007/s10072-017-3205-1. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
6
Reward functioning in posttraumatic stress and substance use disorders.创伤后应激障碍和物质使用障碍中的奖赏功能。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Apr;14:49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Nov 23.
7
Nicotine Acutely Enhances Reinforcement from Non-Drug Rewards in Humans.尼古丁会急性增强人类非药物奖励带来的强化作用。
Front Psychiatry. 2017 May 1;8:65. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00065. eCollection 2017.
8
Opioid Modulation of Value-Based Decision-Making in Healthy Humans.健康人群中基于价值的决策的阿片类药物调节。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017 Aug;42(9):1833-1840. doi: 10.1038/npp.2017.58. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
9
Common Dimensional Reward Deficits Across Mood and Psychotic Disorders: A Connectome-Wide Association Study.情绪和精神障碍中常见的维度性奖赏缺陷:一项全脑连接组关联研究。
Am J Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 1;174(7):657-666. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16070774. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
Involvement of opioid signaling in food preference and motivation: Studies in laboratory animals.阿片类信号传导在食物偏好和动机中的作用:对实验动物的研究。
Prog Brain Res. 2016;229:159-187. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jul 15.