Suppr超能文献

努力加倍:安非他命对人类基于努力的决策的影响。

Amping up effort: effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 16;31(46):16597-602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4387-11.2011.

Abstract

Animal studies suggest the neurotransmitter dopamine (DA) plays an important role in decision-making. In rats, DA depletion decreases tolerance for effort and probability costs, while drugs enhancing DA increase tolerance for these costs. However, data regarding the effect of DA manipulations on effort and probability costs in humans remain scarce. The current study examined acute effects of d-amphetamine, an indirect DA agonist, on willingness of healthy human volunteers to exert effort for monetary rewards at varying levels of reward value and reward probability. Based on preclinical research, we predicted amphetamine would increase exertion of effort, particularly when reward probability was low. Over three sessions, 17 healthy normal adults received placebo, d-amphetamine 10 mg, and 20 mg under counterbalanced double-blind conditions and completed the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task. Consistent with predictions, amphetamine enhanced willingness to exert effort, particularly when reward probability was lower. Amphetamine did not alter effects of reward magnitude on willingness to exert effort. Amphetamine sped task performance, but its psychomotor effects were not strongly related to its effects on decision-making. This is the first demonstration in humans that dopaminergic manipulations alter willingness to exert effort for rewards. These findings help elucidate neurochemical substrates of choice, with implications for neuropsychiatric diseases characterized by dopaminergic dysfunction and motivational deficits.

摘要

动物研究表明,神经递质多巴胺(DA)在决策中起着重要作用。在大鼠中,DA 的耗竭会降低对努力和概率成本的容忍度,而增强 DA 的药物会增加对这些成本的容忍度。然而,关于 DA 操作对人类努力和概率成本的影响的数据仍然很少。本研究考察了直接 DA 激动剂 d-苯丙胺对健康人类志愿者在不同奖励价值和奖励概率水平下为金钱奖励付出努力的意愿的急性影响。基于临床前研究,我们预测安非他命会增加努力的付出,特别是当奖励概率较低时。在三个会话中,17 名健康正常成年人在双盲条件下接受安慰剂、d-苯丙胺 10 毫克和 20 毫克,并完成了奖励努力任务。与预测一致,安非他命增强了人们付出努力的意愿,特别是当奖励概率较低时。安非他命并没有改变奖励幅度对付出努力意愿的影响。安非他命加快了任务的完成速度,但它的精神运动效应与它对决策的影响没有很强的关系。这是首次在人类中证明,多巴胺能操作改变了为奖励付出努力的意愿。这些发现有助于阐明选择的神经化学基础,对以多巴胺能功能障碍和动机缺陷为特征的神经精神疾病具有重要意义。

相似文献

9
Dopaminergic modulation of risk-based decision making.基于风险的决策的多巴胺能调节。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Feb;34(3):681-97. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.121. Epub 2008 Jul 30.
10
Effort-based decision making varies by smoking status.基于努力的决策因吸烟状况而异。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020 Apr;237(4):1081-1090. doi: 10.1007/s00213-019-05437-3. Epub 2020 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

2
Impaired effort allocation in schizophrenia.精神分裂症中努力分配受损。
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Jul 15;42:100378. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100378. eCollection 2025 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of amphetamine on reactivity to emotional stimuli.安非他命对情绪刺激反应的影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Mar;220(1):143-53. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2498-7. Epub 2011 Sep 24.
7
Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience.重新思考抑郁症中的快感缺失:转化神经科学的启示。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Jan;35(3):537-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jul 11.
8
Differential effects of dopaminergic manipulations on risky choice.多巴胺能干预对风险选择的差异影响。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Aug;211(2):209-21. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1883-y. Epub 2010 May 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验