Division of Molecular Genetics and Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
Int J Obes (Lond). 2013 Mar;37(3):399-403. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.105. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
To compare, in mice, the accuracy of estimates of energy expenditure (EE) using an energy balance technique (TEEbal: food energy intake and body composition change) vs indirect calorimetry (TEEIC).
In 32 male C57BL/6J mice, EE was estimated using an energy balance (caloric intake minus change in body energy stores) method over a 37-day period. EE was also measured in the same animals by indirect calorimetry. These measures were compared.
The two methods were highly correlated (r(2)=0.87: TEEbal=1.07*TEEIC-0.22, P<0.0001). By Bland-Altman analysis, TEEbal estimates were slightly higher (4.6±1.5%; P<0.05) than TEEIC estimates (Bias=0.55 kcal per 24 h).
TEEbal can be performed in 'home cages' and provides an accurate integrated long-term measurement of EE while minimizing potentially confounding stress that may accompany the use of indirect calorimetry systems. The technique can also be used to assess long-term energy intake.
比较小鼠能量消耗(EE)的两种估计方法,即能量平衡技术(TEEbal:食物能量摄入和身体成分变化)和间接测热法(TEEIC)。
在 32 只雄性 C57BL/6J 小鼠中,使用能量平衡法(热量摄入减去身体能量储存的变化)在 37 天内估计 EE。同样的动物也通过间接测热法测量 EE。比较这些测量值。
两种方法高度相关(r²=0.87:TEEbal=1.07*TEEIC-0.22,P<0.0001)。通过 Bland-Altman 分析,TEEbal 估计值略高于 TEEIC 估计值(4.6±1.5%;P<0.05)(偏差=0.55 千卡/24 小时)。
TEEbal 可在“家庭笼”中进行,可提供准确的综合长期 EE 测量,同时最大限度地减少可能伴随间接测热系统使用的潜在混杂应激。该技术还可用于评估长期能量摄入。