• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曼尼托巴省实施犬种立法对减少人因狗咬伤住院的效果。

Effectiveness of breed-specific legislation in decreasing the incidence of dog-bite injury hospitalisations in people in the Canadian province of Manitoba.

机构信息

Department of Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

出版信息

Inj Prev. 2013 Jun;19(3):177-83. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040389. Epub 2012 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040389
PMID:22753529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3664365/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The city of Winnipeg was the first among several jurisdictions in Manitoba, Canada, to introduce breed specific legislation (BSL) by banning pit-bull type dogs in 1990. The objective of the present work was to study the effectiveness of BSL in Manitoba.

METHODS

Temporal differences in incidence of dog-bite injury hospitalisations (DBIH) within and across Manitoba jurisdictions with and without BSL were compared. Incidence was calculated as the number of unique cases of DBIH divided by the total person-years at risk and expressed as the number per 100000 person-years. Year of implementation determined the pre-BSL and post-BSL period for jurisdictions with BSL; for jurisdictions without BSL to date, the entire study period (1984-2006) was considered as the preimplementation period. The annual number of DBIH, adjusted for total population at risk, was modelled in a negative binomial regression analysis with repeated measures. Year, jurisdiction and BSL implementation were independent variables. An interaction term between jurisdiction and BSL was introduced.

RESULTS

A total of 16 urban and rural jurisdictions with pit-bull bans were identified. At the provincial level, there was a significant reduction in DBIH rates from the pre-BSL to post-BSL period (3.47 (95% CI 3.17 to 3.77) per 100000 person-years to 2.84 (95% CI 2.53 to 3.15); p=0.005). In regression restricted to two urban jurisdictions, DBIH rate in Winnipeg relative to Brandon (a city without BSL) was significantly (p<0.001) lower after BSL (rate ratio (RR)=1.10 in people of all ages and 0.92 in those aged <20 years) than before (RR=1.29 and 1.28, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

BSL may have resulted in a reduction of DBIH in Winnipeg, and appeared more effective in protecting those aged <20 years.

摘要

背景

温尼伯市是加拿大马尼托巴省几个辖区中第一个通过 1990 年颁布的品种特定立法(BSL)来禁止斗牛梗犬的城市。本研究的目的是研究 BSL 在马尼托巴省的有效性。

方法

比较有无 BSL 的马尼托巴省各辖区内和跨辖区的犬咬伤住院(DBIH)发生率的时间差异。发生率计算为 DBIH 的独特病例数除以总风险人群年数,并表示为每 100000 人年的病例数。有 BSL 的辖区的实施年份决定了 BSL 之前和之后的时期;对于到目前为止没有 BSL 的辖区,整个研究期间(1984-2006 年)被视为实施前时期。采用重复测量的负二项回归分析对调整了总风险人群的每年 DBIH 数量进行建模。年份、辖区和 BSL 实施是独立变量。引入了辖区和 BSL 实施之间的交互项。

结果

共确定了 16 个有斗牛梗犬禁令的城市和农村辖区。在省级层面,从 BSL 实施前到实施后,DBIH 发生率显著降低(3.47(95%CI 3.17 至 3.77)/100000 人年至 2.84(95%CI 2.53 至 3.15);p=0.005)。在仅限于两个城市辖区的回归中,与布兰登(一个没有 BSL 的城市)相比,温尼伯的 DBIH 发生率在 BSL 实施后显著降低(p<0.001)(所有年龄段的人群的率比(RR)为 1.10,20 岁以下人群的 RR 为 0.92),而 BSL 实施前的 RR 分别为 1.29 和 1.28。

结论

BSL 可能导致温尼伯的 DBIH 减少,并且在保护 20 岁以下人群方面似乎更有效。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of breed-specific legislation in decreasing the incidence of dog-bite injury hospitalisations in people in the Canadian province of Manitoba.曼尼托巴省实施犬种立法对减少人因狗咬伤住院的效果。
Inj Prev. 2013 Jun;19(3):177-83. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040389. Epub 2012 Jun 30.
2
Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status and dog-bite injuries through spatial analysis.通过空间分析探索社会经济地位与犬咬伤之间的关系。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):2846. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
3
Emergency department visits for dog bite injuries in Missouri municipalities with and without breed-specific legislation: a propensity score-matched analysis.在有和没有特定品种立法的密苏里州市镇中,因狗咬伤而到急诊科就诊的情况:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Apr 5;12:1354698. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1354698. eCollection 2024.
4
Human hospitalisations due to dog bites in Ireland (1998-2013): Implications for current breed specific legislation.爱尔兰因犬类咬伤导致的人类住院情况(1998 - 2013年):对现行特定品种立法的启示
Vet J. 2015 Jun;204(3):357-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
5
Animal control measures and their relationship to the reported incidence of dog bites in urban Canadian municipalities.加拿大城市中动物控制措施及其与报告的犬咬伤发生率的关系。
Can Vet J. 2013 Feb;54(2):145-9.
6
Epidemiology of hospitalizations due to dog bite injuries in Israel, 2009-2016.2009 - 2016年以色列因犬咬伤导致住院治疗的流行病学情况
Injury. 2018 Dec;49(12):2167-2173. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.09.058. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
Epidemiology and surveillance of human animal-bite injuries and rabies post-exposure prophylaxis, in selected counties in Kenya, 2011-2016.肯尼亚部分县 2011-2016 年人间动物咬伤和狂犬病暴露后预防的流行病学和监测。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Aug 9;18(1):996. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5888-5.
8
Dog Bites in the United States from 1971 to 2018: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed Literature.1971 年至 2018 年美国的狗咬伤:同行评议文献的系统评价。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020 Nov;146(5):1166-1176. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000007253.
9
The incidence of public sector hospitalisations due to dog bites in Australia 2001-2013.2001年至2013年澳大利亚公立部门因狗咬伤而住院的发生率。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2017 Aug;41(4):377-380. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12630. Epub 2017 Jul 16.
10
US Adults' Perceptions of Dog Breed Bans, Dog Aggression and Breed-Specific Laws.美国成年人对犬种禁令、犬类攻击行为和犬种特定法律的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 16;19(16):10138. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191610138.

引用本文的文献

1
" Using Procedures to Negotiate the Risk of Dog Bites in Occupational Contexts.在职业环境中使用程序来协商狗咬伤风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 10;18(14):7377. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147377.
2
A Retrospective Analysis of Dog-Dog and Dog-Human Cases of Aggression in Northern Italy.意大利北部犬犬及犬与人攻击案例的回顾性分析
Animals (Basel). 2020 Sep 16;10(9):1662. doi: 10.3390/ani10091662.
3
Small Animal Veterinarians' Perceptions, Experiences, and Views of Common Dog Breeds, Dog Aggression, and Breed-Specific Laws in the United States.美国小动物兽医对常见犬种、犬类攻击行为以及品种特定法律的看法、经验和观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 23;16(21):4081. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16214081.
4
The effect of breed-specific dog legislation on hospital treated dog bites in Odense, Denmark-A time series intervention study.丹麦欧登塞基于品种的犬类立法对医院治疗犬咬伤的影响:一项时间序列干预研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0208393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208393. eCollection 2018.
5
Are Dog Bites a Problem of Nature or Nurture?狗咬人是天性问题还是后天养成问题?
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2018 Nov;26(4):297-298. doi: 10.1177/2292550318800326. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
6
Dog bite injuries to humans and the use of breed-specific legislation: a comparison of bites from legislated and non-legislated dog breeds.犬类对人类的咬伤以及特定品种立法的运用:法定犬种与非法定犬种咬伤情况的比较
Ir Vet J. 2017 Jul 21;70:23. doi: 10.1186/s13620-017-0101-1. eCollection 2017.
7
Systematic Review: Interventions to Educate Children About Dog Safety and Prevent Pediatric Dog-Bite Injuries: A Meta-Analytic Review.系统评价:教育儿童关于犬类安全和预防儿童犬咬伤的干预措施:一项荟萃分析综述。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2017 Aug 1;42(7):779-791. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv164.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of pedestrian countdown signals on pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions: a quasi-experimental study.行人倒计时信号对行人和机动车碰撞的影响:一项准实验研究。
Inj Prev. 2012 Aug;18(4):210-5. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040173. Epub 2011 Dec 10.
2
Mortality, mauling, and maiming by vicious dogs.恶性犬只致死、致残和伤人事件。
Ann Surg. 2011 Apr;253(4):791-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318211cd68.
3
Decline in hospitalisations due to dog bite injuries in Catalonia, 1997-2008. An effect of government regulation?1997-2008 年加泰罗尼亚因狗咬伤住院人数的下降。是政府法规的影响吗?
Inj Prev. 2010 Dec;16(6):408-10. doi: 10.1136/ip.2010.026997. Epub 2010 Aug 30.
4
Epidemiology of rabies post-exposure prophylaxis--United States of America, 2006-2008.狂犬病暴露后预防的流行病学——美国,2006-2008 年。
Vaccine. 2009 Nov 27;27(51):7156-61. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.028.
5
Dog bites in The Netherlands: a study of victims, injuries, circumstances and aggressors to support evaluation of breed specific legislation.荷兰的狗咬伤:一项针对受害者、伤害、情况和攻击者的研究,以支持对特定品种立法的评估。
Vet J. 2010 Dec;186(3):292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2009.10.001. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
6
Approach to management of suspected rabies exposures: what primary care physicians need to know.疑似狂犬病暴露的管理方法:基层医疗医生需要了解的内容。
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Mar;55(3):247-51.
7
Dog bites: still a problem?犬咬伤:仍是一个问题吗?
Inj Prev. 2008 Oct;14(5):296-301. doi: 10.1136/ip.2007.016220.
8
Laboratory diagnosis of rabies in Canada for calendar year 2006.2006年加拿大狂犬病的实验室诊断
Can Vet J. 2008 Apr;49(4):359-61.
9
Results of the 2006 AVMA survey of companion animal ownership in US pet-owning households.2006年美国兽医协会对拥有宠物的家庭中伴侣动物饲养情况的调查结果。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Mar 1;232(5):695-6. doi: 10.2460/javma.232.5.695.
10
Canine and human factors related to dog bite injuries.与犬咬伤相关的犬类及人类因素。
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2008 Feb 15;232(4):542-6. doi: 10.2460/javma.232.4.542.