Clarke Nancy M, Fraser David
Animal Welfare Program, University of British Columbia, 2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Can Vet J. 2013 Feb;54(2):145-9.
Various measures, including ticketing, licensing, and breed-specific legislation, are used by municipalities to control dog bites, but their effectiveness is largely unknown. Thirty-six urban Canadian municipalities provided information about their animal control practices, resourcing, and (for 22 municipalities) rate of reported dog bites. Municipalities differed widely in rates of licensing (4% to 75%) and ticketing (0.1 to 83 per 10,000 people), even where staffing and budgets were similar. Reported frequency of dog bites ranged from 0 to 9.0 (median 1.9) per 10,000 people. Rates were generally higher in municipalities with higher ticketing, licensing, staffing, and budget levels. However, in municipalities with very active ticketing the reported bite rate was much lower than predicted by a linear regression on ticketing rate (quadratic regression, R(2) = 0.52), likely reflecting a reduction in actual bites with very active enforcement. Municipalities with and without breed-specific legislation did not differ in reported bite rate. Ticketing appeared most effective in reducing dog bites, although it may also lead to increased reporting.
包括发放许可证、开具罚单以及特定品种立法在内的各种措施,被市政当局用于控制犬类咬伤事件,但这些措施的有效性在很大程度上尚不清楚。36个加拿大城市提供了有关其动物控制措施、资源配置以及(22个城市)犬类咬伤报告发生率的信息。即使在人员配备和预算相似的情况下,各城市在许可证发放率(4%至75%)和罚单开具率(每万人0.1至83张)方面也存在很大差异。每万人报告的犬类咬伤发生率在0至9.0之间(中位数为1.9)。在罚单开具率、许可证发放率、人员配备和预算水平较高的城市,发生率通常也较高。然而,在罚单开具非常积极的城市,报告的咬伤发生率远低于根据罚单开具率进行线性回归预测的结果(二次回归,R(2)=0.52),这可能反映出积极执法使实际咬伤事件减少。有特定品种立法和没有特定品种立法的城市在报告的咬伤发生率上没有差异。开具罚单似乎在减少犬类咬伤方面最为有效,尽管这也可能导致报告数量增加。