Eloff J N, Ntloedibe D T, van Brummelen R
Phytomedicine Programme, Dept of Paraclinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110 South Africa.
Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2011;8(5 Suppl):1-12. doi: 10.4314/ajtcam.v8i5S.11. Epub 2011 Jul 3.
Three of the factors limiting the rational use of herbal medicine are uncertainty on effectivity, uncertainty on safety and variation in quality of the product. Because many herbal medicines have been used over centuries by indigenous peoples, the safety and effectivity is frequently not such a big concern. With more people collecting and distributing herbal medicine, the offered product is however, frequently not what the label indicates either through a genuine mistake, but also through fraud especially where expensive herbal medicine is concerned. Some wrong identifications have already led to serious side effects and deaths. Planar chromatography or thin layer chromatography [TLC] is widely used to verify the identity of plant extracts by determining the chemical fingerprint of the extracts. In a leading publication 17 different extractants, 41 solvent systems and 44 spray reagents have been used to verify the identity of important herbal preparations. We investigated whether a simplified system could not be developed to aid small laboratories in identifying different herbal medicines. We compared the efficacy of different extractants, identified and developed three TLC solvent systems that would separate compounds with low, medium and high polarity and then also investigated the use of several spray reagents. With acetone as extractant and benzene:ethanol:ammonia [9:1:0.1], chloroform:ethylacetate:formic acid [5:4:1] and ethylacetate:methanol:water [10:1.35:1] as TLC solvent system and vanillin-sulphuric acid as spray reagent the identity of 81 samples of more than 50 herbal preparations could be verified on the basis of the chromatograms. The same product from different suppliers usually gave similar chromatograms. More importantly in several cases it was clear that products with the same label were so different that a mistake must have occurred in the labelling. This method has found application in the quality control of the most important African medicinal plants in the recently published African Herbal Pharmacopoeia produced by the Association for African Medicinal Plant Standards (AAMPS).
限制草药合理使用的三个因素是有效性不确定、安全性不确定以及产品质量差异。由于许多草药已被原住民使用了几个世纪,安全性和有效性通常不是大问题。然而,随着越来越多的人采集和销售草药,所提供的产品往往并非标签所示,这既有真正的失误,也存在欺诈行为,尤其是涉及昂贵草药时。一些错误的识别已经导致了严重的副作用甚至死亡。平面色谱法或薄层色谱法(TLC)被广泛用于通过测定提取物的化学指纹图谱来验证植物提取物的身份。在一份权威出版物中,已使用17种不同的萃取剂、41种溶剂系统和44种喷雾试剂来验证重要草药制剂的身份。我们研究了是否可以开发一种简化系统来帮助小型实验室识别不同的草药产品。我们比较了不同萃取剂的效果,确定并开发了三种TLC溶剂系统,它们可以分离低、中、高极性的化合物,然后还研究了几种喷雾试剂的使用。以丙酮为萃取剂,苯:乙醇:氨(9:1:0.1)、氯仿:乙酸乙酯:甲酸(5:4:1)和乙酸乙酯:甲醇:水(10:1.35:1)为TLC溶剂系统,香草醛 - 硫酸为喷雾试剂,基于色谱图可以验证50多种草药制剂的81个样品的身份。来自不同供应商的同一产品通常会给出相似的色谱图。更重要的是,在一些情况下很明显,具有相同标签的产品差异很大,以至于标签一定有误。这种方法已应用于非洲药用植物标准协会(AAMPS)最近出版的《非洲草药药典》中最重要的非洲药用植物的质量控制。