Center for Regional Change, University of California at Davis, 152 Hunt Hall, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2012 May;9(5):1593-608. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9051593. Epub 2012 May 3.
The identification of "environmental justice (EJ) communities" is an increasingly common element in environmental planning, policy, and regulation. As a result, the choice of methods to define and identify these communities is a critical and often contentious process. This contentiousness is, in turn, a factor of the lack of a commonly accepted method, the concern among many EJ advocates and some regulators that existing frameworks are inadequate, and ultimately, the significant consequences of such designations for both public policy and community residents. With the aim of assisting regulators and advocates to more strategically focus their efforts, the authors developed a Cumulative Environmental Vulnerability Assessment (CEVA). This CEVA is composed of a Cumulative Environmental Hazard Index and a Social Vulnerability Index, with a Health Index as a reference. Applying CEVA produces spatial analysis that identifies the places that are subject to both the highest concentrations of cumulative environmental hazards and the fewest social, economic and political resources to prevent, mitigate, or adapt to these conditions. We recommended that these areas receive special consideration in permitting, monitoring, and enforcement actions, as well as investments in public participation, capacity building, and community economic development.
“环境正义(EJ)社区”的识别是环境规划、政策和法规中越来越常见的要素。因此,选择定义和识别这些社区的方法是一个关键且常常有争议的过程。这种争议性是缺乏普遍接受的方法的一个因素,也是许多 EJ 倡导者和一些监管机构关注的问题,他们认为现有的框架不够充分,最终,这些指定对公共政策和社区居民都有重大影响。为了帮助监管机构和倡导者更有策略地集中精力,作者开发了累积环境脆弱性评估(CEVA)。这个 CEVA 由累积环境危害指数和社会脆弱性指数组成,以健康指数为参考。应用 CEVA 可以进行空间分析,确定那些同时受到最高浓度的累积环境危害和最少的社会、经济和政治资源影响的地方,以预防、减轻或适应这些条件。我们建议在许可、监测和执法行动中以及在公众参与、能力建设和社区经济发展方面对这些地区给予特别考虑。