Dalkin Sonia Michelle, Jones Diana, Lhussier Monique, Cunningham Bill
School of Health, Community and Education Studies, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
BMJ Open. 2012 Jul 2;2(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001533. Print 2012.
Policy- and evidence-based guidelines have highlighted the need for improved palliative and end-of-life care. However, there is still evidence of individuals dying undignified deaths with little pain control, therefore inflicting unnecessary suffering. New commissioning powers have enabled a 2-year pilot of an innovative integrated care pathway (ICP) designed to improve arrangements for individuals with life-limiting illnesses requiring palliative care. A novel feature of the ICP is its focus on palliative care over the last 6 months of life, aiming to intervene early to prepare for and ensure a good death. What is not known is if this pathway works, how it works and who it works for.
A realist evaluation and a complex analytical framework will investigate and discover context, mechanism and outcome conjectures and configurations of the ICP and thus facilitate exploration of how it works and who it works for. A mixed methods approach will be used with small sample sizes to capture the breadth of the ICP. Phase 1 will identify if the pathway works through analysis of NHS Morbidity Information Query and Export Syntax data, locality Death Audit data and the Quality of Dying and Death Questionnaire. Phase 2 employs soft systems methodology with data from focus groups with health professionals to identify how the pathway works. Phase 3 uses the Miller Behavioural Style Scale and interviews with palliative care patients and bereaved relatives to analyse communication in palliative care.
Ethical approval has been granted from the NHS local ethics committee (REC reference number: 11/NE/0318). Research & Development approval has been gained from four different trusts, and relevant voluntary organisations and the local council have been informed about the research. This protocol illustrates the complexity inherent in evaluating a palliative care ICP. Identification of whether the pathway works, how it works and who it works for will be beneficial to all practices and other care providers involved as it will give objective data on the impact of the ICP. Results will be disseminated throughout the study for continuous quality improvement of the ICP. Outcomes from each data collection phase will be disseminated separately if analysis warrants it; all data collection will be utilised in the realist evaluation. The research provides a potential for the dissemination of the pathway to other localities through the transferable knowledge it will generate, from its focus on the contexts that are crucial for successful implementation, the mechanisms that facilitate implementation and the outcomes achieved.
基于政策和证据的指南强调了改善姑息治疗和临终关怀的必要性。然而,仍有证据表明,一些人在几乎没有疼痛控制的情况下尊严尽失,痛苦地死去,从而遭受了不必要的折磨。新的委托权力促成了一项为期两年的创新综合护理路径(ICP)试点项目,该路径旨在改善对需要姑息治疗的临终疾病患者的护理安排。ICP的一个新颖之处在于其关注生命最后6个月的姑息治疗,旨在尽早干预,为安详离世做好准备并确保实现这一目标。目前尚不清楚这条路径是否有效、如何发挥作用以及适用于哪些人。
一项现实主义评价和一个复杂的分析框架将对ICP的背景、机制和结果推测及配置进行调查和发现,从而有助于探究其如何发挥作用以及适用于哪些人。将采用混合方法,样本量较小,以涵盖ICP的广度。第一阶段将通过分析国民保健制度发病率信息查询与导出语法数据、地区死亡审计数据以及死亡质量问卷,确定该路径是否有效。第二阶段采用软系统方法论,利用来自与卫生专业人员焦点小组的数据,确定该路径如何发挥作用。第三阶段使用米勒行为风格量表,并对姑息治疗患者和丧亲亲属进行访谈,以分析姑息治疗中的沟通情况。
已获得国民保健制度地方伦理委员会的伦理批准(伦理审查委员会参考编号:11/NE/0318)。已从四个不同的信托机构获得研究与发展批准,并已将该研究告知相关志愿组织和地方议会。本方案说明了评估姑息治疗ICP所固有的复杂性。确定该路径是否有效、如何发挥作用以及适用于哪些人,将对所有相关的医疗机构和其他护理提供者有益,因为这将提供关于ICP影响的客观数据。研究结果将在整个研究过程中进行传播,以持续改进ICP的质量。如果分析表明有必要,每个数据收集阶段的结果将分别传播;所有数据收集都将用于现实主义评价。该研究有可能通过其产生的可转移知识,将该路径传播到其他地区,这些知识聚焦于对成功实施至关重要的背景、促进实施的机制以及所取得的成果。