Hernandez Brenda Y, Ton Thien, Shvetsov Yurii B, Goodman Marc T, Zhu Xuemei
University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012 Sep;19(9):1348-52. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00191-12. Epub 2012 Jul 3.
Humoral immunity to human papillomavirus (HPV) has not been fully characterized, and there is currently no standard serologic test for the measurement of HPV antibodies. Most HPV serologic assays developed to date are based on virus-like particles (VLPs) of the major HPV capsid protein, L1. We sought to compare the performance of a multiplex HPV L1 VLP-based serologic assay to that of an assay based on VLPs comprised of both L1 and the minor capsid, L2. We developed HPV L1 VLP and L1-L2 VLP-based multiplex seroassays for the detection of HPV type 16 (HPV16) and HPV18 virion binding antibodies using Luminex fluorescent bead technology. We compared the performance of these assays to that of established pseudovirion-based neutralization and L1 VLP-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). A total of 391 serum specimens from unvaccinated adult males and females were tested. The L1 and L1-L2 VLP multiplex seroassays each demonstrated substantial agreement with both the neutralization assays and the ELISAs for the detection of HPV16 antibodies (κ = 0.60 to 0.64). However, the L1-L2 VLP seroassay demonstrated better agreement with neutralization assays for the detection of HPV18 antibodies than the L1 VLP seroassay (κ = 0.74 and 0.43, respectively). L1 and L1-L2 VLP seroassays showed excellent agreement with one another for the detection of HPV16 antibodies (κ = 0.86) but only moderate agreement for HPV18 antibodies (κ = 0.44). The HPV L1-L2 VLP seroassay performs well for the concurrent measurement of HPV16 and -18 antibodies in large numbers of samples and may be extended to include other HPV types.
对人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)的体液免疫尚未得到充分描述,目前尚无用于检测HPV抗体的标准血清学检测方法。迄今为止开发的大多数HPV血清学检测方法都是基于主要HPV衣壳蛋白L1的病毒样颗粒(VLP)。我们试图比较基于HPV L1 VLP的多重血清学检测方法与基于由L1和次要衣壳蛋白L2组成的VLP的检测方法的性能。我们开发了基于HPV L1 VLP和L1-L2 VLP的多重血清学检测方法,使用Luminex荧光微球技术检测16型HPV(HPV16)和18型HPV病毒体结合抗体。我们将这些检测方法的性能与既定的基于假病毒体的中和检测方法和基于L1 VLP的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行了比较。共检测了391份未接种疫苗的成年男性和女性的血清样本。L1和L1-L2 VLP多重血清学检测方法在检测HPV16抗体方面均与中和检测方法和ELISA有高度一致性(κ=0.60至0.64)。然而,在检测HPV18抗体方面,L1-L2 VLP血清学检测方法比L1 VLP血清学检测方法与中和检测方法的一致性更好(κ分别为0.74和0.43)。L1和L1-L2 VLP血清学检测方法在检测HPV16抗体方面相互之间有极好的一致性(κ=0.86),但在检测HPV18抗体方面只有中等一致性(κ=0.44)。HPV L1-L2 VLP血清学检测方法在大量样本中同时检测HPV16和18抗体时表现良好,并且可能扩展到包括其他HPV类型。