• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择生态学如何影响经验决策中的搜索。

How choice ecology influences search in decisions from experience.

机构信息

Departament d'Economia de l'Empresa, Universitat de les Illes Balears, Ctra. Valldemossa Km. 7.5, 07122 Palma de Mallorca, Illes Balears, Spain.

出版信息

Cognition. 2012 Sep;124(3):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.002
PMID:22763337
Abstract

Research into human decision-making has often sidestepped the question of search despite its importance across a wide range of domains such as search for food, mates, allies, visual targets or information. Recently, research on decisions from experience has made progress in finding out how individual characteristics shape search for information. Surprisingly little is known, however, about how the properties of the choice ecology shape people's search. To fill this void, we analyzed how two key ecological properties influence search effort: domain of choice (gains vs. losses) and experienced variance (variance vs. no variance). Many people search longer when facing the prospect of losses relative to gains. Moreover, most people search more in options in which they experience variance relative to options they experience as invariant. We conclude that two factors that have been identified as important determinants of choice also influence search of information.

摘要

人类决策的研究往往回避了搜索的问题,尽管搜索在广泛的领域(如食物、伴侣、盟友、视觉目标或信息的搜索)都非常重要。最近,关于经验决策的研究在发现个体特征如何塑造信息搜索方面取得了进展。然而,人们对选择生态系统的属性如何影响人们的搜索知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,我们分析了两个关键的生态属性如何影响搜索努力:选择领域(收益与损失)和经验方差(方差与无方差)。与收益相比,面对损失的前景时,许多人会进行更长时间的搜索。此外,与经历不变的选项相比,大多数人在经历方差的选项中搜索更多。我们的结论是,已经确定为选择的重要决定因素的两个因素也会影响信息的搜索。

相似文献

1
How choice ecology influences search in decisions from experience.选择生态学如何影响经验决策中的搜索。
Cognition. 2012 Sep;124(3):334-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.002. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
2
Framing effects and risk-sensitive decision making.框架效应与风险敏感决策。
Br J Psychol. 2012 Feb;103(1):83-97. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02047.x. Epub 2011 Jun 15.
3
The effects of insula damage on decision-making for risky gains and losses.脑岛损伤对风险收益与损失决策的影响。
Soc Neurosci. 2009;4(4):347-58. doi: 10.1080/17470910902934400. Epub 2009 May 22.
4
The description-experience gap in risky choice.风险选择中的描述-体验差距。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Dec;13(12):517-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
5
Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.正常衰老会影响在模糊情境下的决策,但不会影响在风险情境下的决策。
Neuropsychology. 2008 Sep;22(5):645-57. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.22.5.645.
6
Consistent constructs in individuals' risk taking in decisions from experience.个体在基于经验的决策中冒险行为的一致结构。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2010 Jun;134(2):225-32. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
7
Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice.基于经验的决策以及罕见事件在风险选择中的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):534-9. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00715.x.
8
[Risk-taking in adolescence: A neuroeconomics approach].[青少年的冒险行为:一种神经经济学方法]
Encephale. 2010 Apr;36(2):147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
9
Gambles vs. quasi-realistic scenarios: expectations to find probability and risk-defusing information.赌博与准现实情景:寻找概率及降低风险信息的期望
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Feb;127(2):222-36. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.002. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
10
Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses?个体在爱荷华赌博任务中的表现差异是否能预测对风险收益和损失的适应性决策?
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010 Feb;32(2):141-50. doi: 10.1080/13803390902881926. Epub 2009 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimation-uncertainty affects decisions with and without learning opportunities.估计不确定性会影响有无学习机会情况下的决策。
Nat Commun. 2025 Jul 21;16(1):6706. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61960-2.
2
Chimpanzees adapt their exploration to key properties of the environment.黑猩猩会根据环境的关键特性来调整它们的探索行为。
Nat Commun. 2025 Feb 20;16(1):1807. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57022-2.
3
Toward an attentional turn in research on risky choice.迈向风险选择研究中的注意力转向。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 6;13:953008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.953008. eCollection 2022.
4
Curiosity or savouring? Information seeking is modulated by both uncertainty and valence.好奇还是品味?信息寻求既受不确定性又受效价的调节。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257011. eCollection 2021.
5
Do adolescents always take more risks than adults? A within-subjects developmental study of context effects on decision making and processing.青少年总是比成年人更冒险吗?一项基于被试内设计的研究,探讨了决策和加工过程中的情境效应。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0255102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255102. eCollection 2021.
6
Uncertainty and Exploration.不确定性与探索。
Decision (Wash D C ). 2019 Jul;6(3):277-286. doi: 10.1037/dec0000101. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
7
Variability in competitive decision-making speed and quality against exploiting and exploitative opponents.针对利用型和剥削型对手,竞争决策速度和质量的可变性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82269-2.
8
Experience and rationality under risk: re-examining the impact of sampling experience.风险下的经验与理性:重新审视抽样经验的影响
Exp Econ. 2020;23(4):1100-1128. doi: 10.1007/s10683-019-09641-y. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
9
The role of information search and its influence on risk preferences.信息搜索的作用及其对风险偏好的影响。
Theory Decis. 2018;84(3):311-339. doi: 10.1007/s11238-017-9623-y. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
10
Acceptable losses: the debatable origins of loss aversion.可接受的损失:损失规避的有争议起源。
Psychol Res. 2019 Oct;83(7):1327-1339. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1013-8. Epub 2018 Apr 16.