Suppr超能文献

量化多变量荟萃分析中研究间异质性的影响。

Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses.

机构信息

MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3805-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.5453. Epub 2012 Jul 4.

Abstract

Measures that quantify the impact of heterogeneity in univariate meta-analysis, including the very popular I(2) statistic, are now well established. Multivariate meta-analysis, where studies provide multiple outcomes that are pooled in a single analysis, is also becoming more commonly used. The question of how to quantify heterogeneity in the multivariate setting is therefore raised. It is the univariate R(2) statistic, the ratio of the variance of the estimated treatment effect under the random and fixed effects models, that generalises most naturally, so this statistic provides our basis. This statistic is then used to derive a multivariate analogue of I(2), which we call I(R)(2). We also provide a multivariate H(2) statistic, the ratio of a generalisation of Cochran's heterogeneity statistic and its associated degrees of freedom, with an accompanying generalisation of the usual I(2) statistic, I(H)(2). Our proposed heterogeneity statistics can be used alongside all the usual estimates and inferential procedures used in multivariate meta-analysis. We apply our methods to some real datasets and show how our statistics are equally appropriate in the context of multivariate meta-regression, where study level covariate effects are included in the model. Our heterogeneity statistics may be used when applying any procedure for fitting the multivariate random effects model.

摘要

目前已经很好地建立了用于量化单变量荟萃分析中异质性的措施,包括非常流行的 I(2)统计量。多变量荟萃分析,即研究提供多个可在单个分析中汇总的结果,也越来越常用。因此,提出了如何在多变量环境中量化异质性的问题。最自然地推广的是单变量 R(2)统计量,即随机和固定效应模型下估计治疗效果的方差比,因此该统计量是我们的基础。然后,我们使用该统计量推导出 I(2)的多变量类似物,我们称之为 I(R)(2)。我们还提供了一个多变量 H(2)统计量,即 Cochran 异质性统计量的推广及其相关自由度与通常的 I(2)统计量的伴随推广的比率,I(H)(2)。我们提出的异质统计量可与多变量荟萃分析中使用的所有常用估计和推断程序一起使用。我们将我们的方法应用于一些真实数据集,并展示了我们的统计量在多变量荟萃回归的背景下同样适用,其中在模型中包含了研究水平协变量的效果。当应用拟合多变量随机效应模型的任何程序时,都可以使用我们的异质统计量。

相似文献

1
Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses.
Stat Med. 2012 Dec 20;31(29):3805-20. doi: 10.1002/sim.5453. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
2
Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2911-29. doi: 10.1002/sim.4327. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
4
Powerful Test of Heterogeneity in Two-Sample Summary-Data Mendelian Randomization.
Stat Med. 2024 Dec 30;43(30):5791-5802. doi: 10.1002/sim.10279. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
5
An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Mar;9(1):73-88. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1274. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
6
An Alternative Measure for Quantifying the Heterogeneity in Meta-Analysis.
Stat Med. 2025 May;44(10-12):e70089. doi: 10.1002/sim.70089.
7
A refined method for multivariate meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Stat Med. 2014 Feb 20;33(4):541-54. doi: 10.1002/sim.5957. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
10
A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis with random inconsistency effects.
Stat Med. 2014 Sep 20;33(21):3639-54. doi: 10.1002/sim.6188. Epub 2014 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

2
A leave-one-out algorithm for contribution analysis in component network meta-analysis.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Aug 7;25(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02619-w.
4
A Global Synthesis on Land-Cover Changes in Watersheds Shaping Freshwater Detrital Food Webs.
Glob Chang Biol. 2025 Aug;31(8):e70380. doi: 10.1111/gcb.70380.
7
Chinese herbal medicine (Tangshen Formula) formula treatment of patients with diabetic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 16;16:1522759. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1522759. eCollection 2025.
9
Outcomes of Air Versus Saline-filled Breast Expanders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 May 23. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04918-5.
10
Prognostic significance of surgical margins in laryngeal cancer treated by transoral laser microsurgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2025 May;45(Suppl. 1):S71-S86. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-suppl.1-45-2025-N1142.

本文引用的文献

1
Multivariate meta-analysis: potential and promise.
Stat Med. 2011 Sep 10;30(20):2481-98. doi: 10.1002/sim.4172. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
2
Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
Stat Med. 2010 Jun 30;29(14):1502-10. doi: 10.1002/sim.3859.
4
A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):137-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x.
6
Undue reliance on I(2) in assessing heterogeneity may mislead.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008 Nov 27;8:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-79.
8
Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jan 12;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-3.
9
A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
Stat Med. 2006 Dec 30;25(24):4321-33. doi: 10.1002/sim.2692.
10
The power of the standard test for the presence of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
Stat Med. 2006 Aug 15;25(15):2688-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.2481.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验