Suppr超能文献

Elders 风险评估指数是一种基于电子行政数据库的衰弱指数,可以识别社区居住成年人髋部骨折的风险。

The Elders Risk Assessment Index, an electronic administrative database-derived frailty index, can identify risk of hip fracture in a cohort of community-dwelling adults.

机构信息

Division of Hospital Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jul;87(7):652-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.01.020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether an Elders Risk Assessment (ERA) index can predict incident hip fractures without the need for physician-patient encounter or bone mineral density testing.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a community-based cohort of 12,650 patients aged 60 years and older. An ERA score was computed for each subject at index time (January 1, 2005). Incidents of hip fracture from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006, were obtained from electronic medical records. We divided the cohort into 5 groups, with the lowest ERA scores forming group A (<15%); 15% to 49%, group B; 50% to 74%, group C; 75% to 89%, group D; and the top 11%, group E. With group A as a reference group, we used logistic regression to compute odds ratios of sustaining hip fracture during a 2-year period (January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006) for groups B, C, D, and E. Sensitivity and specificity of each possible ERA score were calculated, and a receiver operating characteristic curve was created.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-five patients (2.1%) sustained at least 1 hip fracture from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2006. Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for groups B, C, D, and E were 1.6 (0.7-3.4), 4.5 (2.2-9.4), 6.9 (3.3-14.3), and 18.4 (8.9-37.9), respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 74.5%.

CONCLUSION

An electronic medical record-based, easily derived ERA index might be useful in hip fracture risk stratification.

摘要

目的

确定老年人风险评估(ERA)指数是否可以预测髋部骨折的发生,而无需医患接触或骨密度测试。

方法

对一个基于社区的 12650 名 60 岁及以上患者的队列进行回顾性队列研究。为每位患者在指数时间(2005 年 1 月 1 日)计算一个 ERA 评分。从电子病历中获取 2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 12 月 31 日期间的髋部骨折事件。我们将队列分为 5 组,最低 ERA 评分形成组 A(<15%);15%至 49%,组 B;50%至 74%,组 C;75%至 89%,组 D;以及前 11%,组 E。以组 A 为参考组,我们使用逻辑回归计算在 2 年期间(2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 12 月 31 日)发生髋部骨折的组 B、C、D 和 E 的优势比。计算每个可能的 ERA 评分的灵敏度和特异性,并绘制接受者操作特征曲线。

结果

2005 年 1 月 1 日至 2006 年 12 月 31 日期间,有 265 名患者(2.1%)至少发生 1 次髋部骨折。组 B、C、D 和 E 的优势比(95%置信区间)分别为 1.6(0.7-3.4)、4.5(2.2-9.4)、6.9(3.3-14.3)和 18.4(8.9-37.9)。接受者操作特征曲线下面积为 74.5%。

结论

基于电子病历的易于推导的 ERA 指数可能有助于髋部骨折风险分层。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Anticoagulation Patterns Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Atrial Fibrillation.社区居住的老年房颤患者的抗凝模式。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241243005. doi: 10.1177/21501319241243005.
8
Validation of the Elderly Risk Assessment Index in the Emergency Department.急诊科老年风险评估指数的验证。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1441-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.11.048. Epub 2019 Dec 9.

本文引用的文献

4
FRAX and its applications to clinical practice.FRAX及其在临床实践中的应用。
Bone. 2009 May;44(5):734-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.01.373. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
5
Secular trends in hip fracture incidence and recurrence.髋部骨折发病率和复发率的长期趋势。
Osteoporos Int. 2009 May;20(5):687-94. doi: 10.1007/s00198-008-0742-8. Epub 2008 Sep 17.
6
FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK.FRAX与英国男性和女性骨折概率评估
Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):385-97. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0543-5. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
9
Trends in hospital care for hip fractures.髋部骨折的医院护理趋势。
Osteoporos Int. 2007 May;18(5):585-91. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0281-0. Epub 2006 Dec 5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验