Département de Médecine Tropicale, Université de Kinshasa, B.P. 747, Kin XI, République Démocratique du Congo.
Malar J. 2012 Jul 6;11:224. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-224.
Despite some problems related to accuracy and applicability, malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), are currently considered the best option in areas with limited laboratory services for improving case management and reducing over-treatment. However, their performance must be established taking into the account the particularities of each endemic area. In the Democratic Republic of Congo, the validity of Optimal-IT(®) and Paracheck-Pf(®), respectively based on the detection of lactate dehydrogenase and histidine-rich protein-2, was assessed at primary health care level (PHC).
This was a two-stage cluster randomized survey, conducted in one health centre in 12 health zones in Kinshasa city. All patients with malaria presumptive diagnosis were eligible. Gold standard was microscopy performed by experts from the parasitology unit, Kinshasa University.
624 patients were enrolled. 53.4% (95% CI: 49.4-57.3) owed a bed net, obtained in 74.5% of cases (95% CI: 69.4-79.1) through community-based distribution by the National Malaria Control Programme. Microscopy expert reading confirmed 123 malaria cases (19.7%; 95% CI: 16.7-23.1). Overall sensitivity were 79.7% (95% CI: 72.4-86.8), 87.8% (95% CI: 81.9-93.6) and 86.2% (95% CI: 79.9-92.3), respectively, for Optimal-IT(®), Paracheck-Pf(®) and microscopy performed at PHC. Specificity was 97.0% (95% CI: 95.5-98.5), 91.6% (95% CI: 89.1-94.0) and 49.1% (95% CI: 44.7-53.4). The proportion of confirmed cases seemed similar in under-fives compared to others. Any treatment prior to the current visit was a predictor for malaria (AOR: 2.3; 95% CI: 1.5-3.5), but not malaria treatment (AOR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.4-1.8). Bed net ownership tended to protect against malaria (AOR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.45-0.99).
Although microscopy is considered as the "gold standard" for malaria diagnosis at point of care level, this study showed that its accuracy may not always be satisfactory when performed in health centres.
尽管疟疾快速诊断检测(RDT)在准确性和适用性方面存在一些问题,但在实验室服务有限的地区,它仍是改善病例管理和减少过度治疗的最佳选择。然而,其性能必须考虑到每个流行地区的特点。在刚果民主共和国,基于乳酸脱氢酶和富含组氨酸蛋白-2检测的 Optimal-IT(®)和 Paracheck-Pf(®)的有效性,在初级保健中心(PHC)进行了评估。
这是一项在金沙萨市 12 个卫生区的一个卫生中心进行的两阶段聚类随机调查。所有疑似疟疾的患者均符合纳入标准。金标准是由寄生虫学单位的专家进行的显微镜检查。
共纳入 624 例患者。53.4%(95%CI:49.4-57.3)的患者拥有蚊帐,其中 74.5%(95%CI:69.4-79.1)是通过国家疟疾控制规划的社区分发获得的。显微镜专家阅读确认了 123 例疟疾病例(19.7%;95%CI:16.7-23.1)。Optimal-IT(®)的总灵敏度为 79.7%(95%CI:72.4-86.8),Paracheck-Pf(®)为 87.8%(95%CI:81.9-93.6),PHC 下的显微镜检查为 86.2%(95%CI:79.9-92.3)。特异性分别为 97.0%(95%CI:95.5-98.5)、91.6%(95%CI:89.1-94.0)和 49.1%(95%CI:44.7-53.4)。在五岁以下儿童中,确诊病例的比例似乎与其他年龄组相似。在本次就诊前的任何治疗都是疟疾的预测因素(AOR:2.3;95%CI:1.5-3.5),但疟疾治疗不是(AOR:0.87;95%CI:0.4-1.8)。蚊帐的拥有与疟疾的保护作用有关(AOR:0.67;95%CI:0.45-0.99)。
尽管显微镜检查被认为是基层医疗点的“金标准”诊断疟疾的方法,但本研究表明,在卫生中心进行检查时,其准确性可能并不总是令人满意。