Ayuntamiento de Madrid, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2012 Jul;15(2):768-76. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n2.38888.
The Memory Failures of Everyday Questionnaire (MFE) is one of the most widely-used instruments to assess memory failures in daily life. The original scale has nine response options, making it difficult to apply; we created a three-point scale (0-1-2) with response choices that make it easier to administer. We examined the two versions' equivalence in a sample of 193 participants between 19 and 64 years of age. The test-retest reliability and internal consistency of the version we propose were also computed in a sample of 113 people. Several indicators attest to the two forms' equivalence: the correlation between the items' means (r = .94; p < .001) and the order of the items' frequencies (r = .92; p < .001). However, the correlation between global scores on the two forms was not very high (r = .67; p < .001). The results indicate this new version has adequate reliability and internal consistency (r(xx) = .83; p < .001; alpha = .83; p < .001) equivalent to those of the MFE 1-9. The MFE 0-2 provides a brief, simple evaluation, so we recommend it for use in clinical practice as well as research.
日常生活记忆失误问卷(MFE)是评估日常生活中记忆失误的最广泛使用的工具之一。原始量表有九个反应选项,使用起来比较困难;我们创建了一个三点量表(0-1-2),反应选择更易于管理。我们在一个年龄在 19 至 64 岁之间的 193 名参与者样本中检查了这两个版本的等效性。我们还在 113 人的样本中计算了所提出版本的重测信度和内部一致性。几个指标证明了这两种形式的等效性:项目平均值之间的相关性(r =.94;p <.001)和项目频率顺序之间的相关性(r =.92;p <.001)。然而,两种形式的总分之间的相关性不是很高(r =.67;p <.001)。结果表明,这个新版本具有足够的可靠性和内部一致性(r(xx) =.83;p <.001;alpha =.83;p <.001),与 MFE 1-9 相当。MFE 0-2 提供了简短、简单的评估,因此我们建议在临床实践和研究中使用。