• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韵律边界在默读句子时会延迟处理即将到来的词汇信息。

Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.

机构信息

Center for Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):915-30. doi: 10.1037/a0029182. Epub 2012 Jul 9.

DOI:10.1037/a0029182
PMID:22774853
Abstract

Prosodic boundaries can be used to guide syntactic parsing in both spoken and written sentence comprehension, but it is unknown whether the processing of prosodic boundaries affects the processing of upcoming lexical information. In 3 eye-tracking experiments, participants read silently sentences that allow for 2 possible syntactic interpretations when there is no comma or other cue specifying which interpretation should be taken. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants heard a low-pass filtered auditory version of the sentence, which provided a prosodic boundary cue prior to each sentence. In Experiment 1, we found that the boundary cue helped syntactic disambiguation after the cue and led to longer fixation durations on regions right before the cue than on identical regions without prosodic boundary information. In Experiments 2 and 3, we used a gaze-contingent display-change paradigm to manipulate the parafoveal visibility of the first constituent character of the target word after the disambiguating position. Results of Experiment 2 showed that previewing the first character significantly reduced the reading time of the target word, but this preview benefit was greatly reduced when the prosodic boundary cue was introduced at this position. In Experiment 3, instead of the acoustic cues, a visually presented comma was inserted at the disambiguating position in each sentence. Results showed that the comma effect on lexical processing was essentially the same as the effect of prosodic boundary cue. These findings demonstrate that processing a prosodic boundary could impair the processing of parafoveal information during sentence reading.

摘要

韵律边界可以用于指导口语和书面语句子理解中的句法分析,但目前尚不清楚韵律边界的处理是否会影响即将到来的词汇信息的处理。在 3 项眼动实验中,参与者默读句子,在没有逗号或其他提示指定应采用哪种解释的情况下,这些句子允许有 2 种可能的句法解释。在实验 1 和实验 2 中,参与者听到句子的低通滤波听觉版本,该版本在每个句子之前提供了一个韵律边界提示。在实验 1 中,我们发现边界提示有助于提示后的句法消歧,并导致提示前的注视持续时间长于没有韵律边界信息的相同区域。在实验 2 和实验 3 中,我们使用注视相关的显示变化范式来操纵目标词在消歧位置后的第一个成分字符的前区的 parafoveal 可见性。实验 2 的结果表明,预览第一个字符会显著减少目标词的阅读时间,但当在该位置引入韵律边界提示时,这种预览优势会大大降低。在实验 3 中,在每个句子的消歧位置插入了一个视觉呈现的逗号,而不是声学提示。结果表明,逗号对词汇处理的影响与韵律边界提示的影响基本相同。这些发现表明,处理韵律边界可能会损害句子阅读过程中对 parafoveal 信息的处理。

相似文献

1
Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.韵律边界在默读句子时会延迟处理即将到来的词汇信息。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 May;39(3):915-30. doi: 10.1037/a0029182. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
2
Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension.语言节奏指导书面句子理解中的句法分析决策。
Cognition. 2012 Apr;123(1):1-20. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.11.012. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
3
Effects of cooperating and conflicting prosody in spoken English garden path sentences: ERP evidence for the boundary deletion hypothesis.协同与冲突韵律对英语口语中花园路径句的影响:边界删除假说的 ERP 证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Oct;23(10):2731-51. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2011.21610. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
4
Processing the in the parafovea: are articles skipped automatically?在视区中处理:文章会自动略过吗?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2013 Mar;39(2):649-62. doi: 10.1037/a0029294. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
5
How and when prosodic boundaries influence syntactic parsing under different discourse contexts: an ERP study.在不同的语篇语境下,韵律边界如何以及何时影响句法分析:一项 ERP 研究。
Biol Psychol. 2010 Mar;83(3):250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.009. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
6
Prosodic phrasing in the presence of unambiguous verb information--ERP evidence from German.存在明确动词信息时的韵律短语划分——来自德语的事件相关电位证据
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jan 29;81:31-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.11.022. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Processing consequences of superfluous and missing prosodic breaks in auditory sentence comprehension.在听觉句子理解中处理多余和缺失韵律停顿的后果。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Nov;51(13):2715-28. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.09.008. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
8
Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.眼动追踪与功能磁共振成像相结合揭示句子理解过程中语言预测的神经基础。
Cortex. 2015 Jul;68:33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.011. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
9
Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of syntactic priming in sentence comprehension.句子理解中句法启动的电生理和行为学证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jan;35(1):19-45. doi: 10.1037/a0013984.
10
Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading.在语境中理解词汇:阅读过程中词汇与句子层面信息的交互作用。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Mar;19(1):59-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.022.

引用本文的文献

1
Eye movements during text reading align with the rate of speech production.阅读文本时的眼球运动与言语产生的速率一致。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Mar;6(3):429-442. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01215-4. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
2
Effects of Implicit Prosody and Semantic Bias on the Resolution of Ambiguous Chinese Phrases.内隐韵律和语义偏向对汉语歧义短语消解的影响。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jun 4;10:1308. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01308. eCollection 2019.
3
Word segmentation by alternating colors facilitates eye guidance in Chinese reading.交替颜色的分词有助于中文阅读中的眼球引导。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):729-740. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0797-5.
4
Processing Rhythmic Pattern during Chinese Sentence Reading: An Eye Movement Study.汉语句子阅读中韵律模式的加工:一项眼动研究
Front Psychol. 2015 Dec 9;6:1881. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01881. eCollection 2015.
5
Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.阅读过程中形式与预期匹配对首次眼动测量的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):958-76. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000054. Epub 2015 Apr 27.