• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳牙三种龋病去除方法的临床评估:一项随机对照试验

Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Phonghanyudh A, Phantumvanit P, Songpaisan Y, Petersen P E

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathum-thani, Thailand.

出版信息

Community Dent Health. 2012 Jun;29(2):173-8.

PMID:22779380
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical performance and radiographic outcome of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restoration in primary molars using three caries removal techniques.

BASIC RESEARCH DESIGN

Randomised clinical controlled trial.

CLINICAL SETTING

Two standard dental clinics in 2 hospitals near Bangkok.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 276 children, aged 6-11, having dentinal caries on the occlusal and/or proximal surface extending at least one-third of dentine without signs and/or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.

INTERVENTION

Children were randomly allocated into 3 study groups with different caries removal techniques: Group 1, partial soft caries removal at enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) by spoon excavation; Group 2, complete soft caries removal by spoon excavation; and Group 3, conventional caries removal by steel burs. All cavity preparations were restored with GIC (Fuji IX, GC Corp., Japan).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinical and radiographic evaluations were carried out at 6 and 12 months after restoration.

RESULTS

After 12 months, 89, 89, and 88 restorations in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were evaluated. The cumulative survival rates of GIC restorations in Groups 1, 2 and 3 were 83%, 83%, and 89% while the cumulative survival rates of pulp were 99%, 100% and 98% respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the survival of GIC restorations or pulp in the three groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The clinical and radiographic evaluations after 12 months indicated that partial soft caries removal at EDJ followed by GIC restoration was comparable to that of ART and conventional approaches.

摘要

目的

采用三种龋坏去除技术评估玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)修复乳磨牙的临床性能和影像学结果。

基础研究设计

随机临床对照试验。

临床环境

曼谷附近2家医院的2家标准牙科诊所。

参与者

总共276名6至11岁的儿童,其咬合面和/或邻面有牙本质龋,龋坏延伸至牙本质至少三分之一,且无不可逆牙髓炎的体征和/或症状。

干预措施

将儿童随机分为3个研究组,采用不同的龋坏去除技术:第1组,用匙形挖器在釉质-牙本质交界处(EDJ)部分去除软龋;第2组,用匙形挖器完全去除软龋;第3组,用钢钻常规去除龋坏。所有窝洞预备均用GIC(日本GC公司的Fuji IX)进行修复。

主要观察指标

修复后6个月和12个月进行临床和影像学评估。

结果

12个月后,对第1、2和3组的89、89和88个修复体进行了评估。第1、2和3组GIC修复体的累积生存率分别为83%、83%和89%,而牙髓的累积生存率分别为99%、100%和98%。三组GIC修复体或牙髓的生存率无统计学显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

12个月后的临床和影像学评估表明,在EDJ处部分去除软龋后进行GIC修复与非创伤性修复治疗(ART)和传统方法相当。

相似文献

1
Clinical evaluation of three caries removal approaches in primary teeth: a randomised controlled trial.乳牙三种龋病去除方法的临床评估:一项随机对照试验
Community Dent Health. 2012 Jun;29(2):173-8.
2
Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.乳牙粘结修复的随机临床试验。18个月的结果。
Am J Dent. 2013 Dec;26(6):351-5.
3
Two-year clinical study on postoperative pulpal complications arising from the absence of a glass-ionomer lining in deep occlusal resin-composite restorations.关于深咬合树脂复合材料修复中未使用玻璃离子衬层引发的术后牙髓并发症的两年临床研究。
J Investig Clin Dent. 2013 Nov;4(4):265-70. doi: 10.1111/j.2041-1626.2012.00160.x. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
4
Chemo-mechanical caries removal with Papacarie™: case series with 84 reports and 12 months of follow-up.使用Papacarie™进行化学机械去龋:84例报告及12个月随访的病例系列
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Mar 1;15(2):250-3. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1523.
5
Partial caries removal and cariostatic materials in carious primary molar teeth: a randomised controlled clinical trial.乳牙龋坏磨牙的部分龋坏组织去除及防龋材料:一项随机对照临床试验
Br Dent J. 2004 Dec 11;197(11):697-701; discussion 689. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4811865.
6
The effect of GIC-brand on the survival rate of proximal-ART restorations.GIC 品牌对近中 -ART 修复体存活率的影响。
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013 Jul;23(4):251-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2012.01259.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
7
Pulp exposure occurrence and outcomes after 1- or 2-visit indirect pulp therapy vs complete caries removal in primary and permanent molars.在乳牙和恒牙磨牙中,一次或两次就诊的间接盖髓术与完全去龋后牙髓暴露的发生率及转归情况。
Pediatr Dent. 2010 Jul-Aug;32(4):347-55.
8
Alternative approach for carious tissue removal in primary teeth.乳牙龋坏组织去除的替代方法。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016 Oct;17(5):413-417. doi: 10.1007/s40368-016-0246-8. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
9
Outcomes of one-step incomplete and complete excavation in primary teeth: a 24-month randomized controlled trial.乳牙一步法不完全和完全开髓治疗的疗效:一项24个月的随机对照试验。
Caries Res. 2014;48(5):376-83. doi: 10.1159/000357628. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
10
Does low-cost GIC have the same survival rate as high-viscosity GIC in atraumatic restorative treatments? A RCT.在微创性修复治疗中,廉价玻璃离子水门汀与高粘度玻璃离子水门汀的存活率是否相同?一项 RCT 研究。
Braz Oral Res. 2020 Jan 24;33:e125. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0125. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Selective removal to soft dentine or selective removal to firm dentine for deep caries lesions ın permanent posterior teeth: a randomized controlled clinical trial up to 2 years.对于恒牙深龋,选择软化牙本质去除或选择矿化牙本质去除:一项长达 2 年的随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 May;27(5):2125-2137. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04815-0. Epub 2022 Dec 3.
2
Interventions for treating cavitated or dentine carious lesions.治疗龋坏或牙本质龋损的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 19;7(7):CD013039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013039.pub2.
3
Selective Caries Removal in Permanent Teeth (SCRiPT) for the treatment of deep carious lesions: a randomised controlled clinical trial in primary care.
选择性龋去净术(SCRiPT)治疗恒牙深龋:基层医疗的一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 9;21(1):336. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01637-6.
4
Strategic Management of Early Childhood Caries in Thailand: A Critical Overview.泰国婴幼儿龋的战略性管理:批判性综述。
Front Public Health. 2021 Jun 11;9:664541. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.664541. eCollection 2021.
5
Model for Taking Care of Patients with Early Childhood Caries during the SARS-Cov-2 Pandemic.SARS-CoV-2 大流行期间儿童早期龋病患者的护理模式。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 26;17(11):3751. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113751.
6
A randomized clinical trial of cavity liners after selective caries removal: one-year follow-up.选择性龋病去除后窝洞衬层的随机临床试验:一年随访
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Jun 3;27:e20180700. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0700.
7
Survival percentages of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations and sealants in posterior teeth: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.后牙非创伤性修复治疗(ART)修复体和窝沟封闭剂的存留率:一项更新的系统评价和Meta分析
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Nov;22(8):2703-2725. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2625-5. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
8
Evaluation of Dentin-Pulp Complex Response after Conservative Clinical Procedures in Primary Teeth.乳牙保守性临床操作后牙髓牙本质复合体反应的评估
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018 May-Jun;11(3):188-192. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1509. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
9
Atraumatic restorative treatment versus conventional restorative treatment for managing dental caries.非创伤性修复治疗与传统修复治疗在龋病管理中的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 28;12(12):CD008072. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008072.pub2.
10
Alternative approach for carious tissue removal in primary teeth.乳牙龋坏组织去除的替代方法。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016 Oct;17(5):413-417. doi: 10.1007/s40368-016-0246-8. Epub 2016 Sep 15.