• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估庇护性护理机构的制度政策。

Assessing the institutional policies of sheltered care settings.

作者信息

Lemke S, Moos R H

出版信息

J Gerontol. 1980 Jan;35(1):96-107. doi: 10.1093/geronj/35.1.96.

DOI:10.1093/geronj/35.1.96
PMID:7350226
Abstract

The Policy and Program Information Form (POLIF) measures the policies and services of sheltered care settings in terms of ten conceptually unified dimensions. The development of the POLIF is described, and psychometric characteristics, based on data from 93 representative facilities, are presented. These data show that facilities providing a higher level of care tend to provide residents with less choice and control. Larger facilities tend to be more selective, to offer more health services and social activities, and to have formal means for transmitting expectations and involving residents in decision making. Sample profiles illustrate the usefulness of this instrument for describing and comparing facilities; additional uses are discussed.

摘要

政策与项目信息表(POLIF)从十个概念上统一的维度衡量了庇护性护理机构的政策和服务。文中描述了POLIF的开发过程,并基于93个代表性机构的数据呈现了其心理测量特征。这些数据表明,提供更高护理水平的机构往往为居民提供更少的选择和控制权。规模较大的机构往往更具选择性,提供更多的健康服务和社会活动,并有正式的方式来传达期望并让居民参与决策。示例简介说明了该工具在描述和比较机构方面的有用性;还讨论了其其他用途。

相似文献

1
Assessing the institutional policies of sheltered care settings.评估庇护性护理机构的制度政策。
J Gerontol. 1980 Jan;35(1):96-107. doi: 10.1093/geronj/35.1.96.
2
Assessing the physical and architectural features of sheltered care settings.
J Gerontol. 1980 Jul;35(4):571-83. doi: 10.1093/geronj/35.4.571.
3
The suprapersonal environments of sheltered care settings.
J Gerontol. 1981 Mar;36(2):233-43. doi: 10.1093/geronj/36.2.233.
4
Personal and environmental determinants of activity involvement among elderly residents of congregate facilities.
J Gerontol. 1989 Jul;44(4):S139-48. doi: 10.1093/geronj/44.4.s139.
5
Preferences of older adults and experts for policies and services in group living facilities.老年人和专家对集体生活设施中政策与服务的偏好。
Psychol Aging. 1989 Mar;4(1):48-56. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.4.1.48.
6
Residential care facilities: a key sector in the spectrum of long-term care providers in the United States.寄宿护理机构:美国长期护理服务提供商体系中的一个关键领域。
NCHS Data Brief. 2011 Dec(78):1-8.
7
Validity of the Sheltered Care Environment Scale: rejoinder to Lemke and Moos (1990).庇护性护理环境量表的效度:对莱姆克和穆斯(1990年)的回应
Psychol Aging. 1990 Dec;5(4):572-573. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.5.4.572.
8
Health care and personal care needs among residents in nursing homes, group homes, and congregate housing in Japan: why does transition occur, and where can the frail elderly establish a permanent residence?日本养老院、集体之家和集中式住房居民的医疗保健和个人护理需求:为什么会发生转移,以及体弱老年人可以在哪里建立永久住所?
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014 Jan;15(1):76.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
9
Determinants of interpersonal support and self-direction in group residential facilities.集体居住设施中人际支持和自我导向的决定因素。
J Gerontol. 1990 Sep;45(5):S184-92. doi: 10.1093/geronj/45.5.s184.
10
Measuring the social climate of congregate residences for older people: Sheltered Care Environment Scale.测量老年人集体住所的社会氛围:庇护性护理环境量表。
Psychol Aging. 1987 Mar;2(1):20-9. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.2.1.20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care in Design and Implementation.养老院护理的温室模式:设计与实施
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):352-77. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12418. Epub 2015 Nov 25.