Department of International Health, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Epidemiol Infect. 2013 Jan;141(1):115-31. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812001525. Epub 2012 Jul 16.
To date many studies have measured the effect of key child survival interventions on the main cause of mortality while anecdotally reporting effects on all-cause mortality. We conducted a systematic literature review and abstracted cause-specific and all-cause mortality data from included studies. We then estimated the effect of the intervention on the disease of primary interest and calculated the additional deaths prevented (i.e. the indirect effect). We calculated that insecticide-treated nets have been shown to result in a 12% reduction [95% confidence interval (CI) 0·0-23] among non-malaria deaths. We found pneumonia case management to reduce non-pneumonia mortality by 20% (95% CI 8-22). For measles vaccine, seven of the 10 studies reporting an effect on all-cause mortality demonstrated an additional benefit of vaccine on all-cause mortality. These interventions may have benefits on causes of death beyond the specific cause of death they are targeted to prevent and this should be considered when evaluating the effects of implementation of interventions.
迄今为止,许多研究已经衡量了关键儿童生存干预措施对主要死因的影响,同时也有传闻报告了对全因死亡率的影响。我们进行了系统的文献回顾,并从纳入的研究中提取了病因特异性和全因死亡率数据。然后,我们估计了干预措施对主要疾病的影响,并计算了预防的额外死亡人数(即间接效应)。我们计算出,经杀虫剂处理的蚊帐可使非疟疾死亡人数减少 12%(95%置信区间 0·0-23)。我们发现肺炎病例管理可使非肺炎死亡率降低 20%(95%置信区间 8-22)。对于麻疹疫苗,在报告对全因死亡率有影响的 10 项研究中,有 7 项研究表明疫苗对全因死亡率有额外的益处。这些干预措施可能对死因有超出其针对预防的特定死因的益处,在评估干预措施实施的效果时应考虑这一点。