• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威城市人口的交通方式偏好、风险感知和担忧。

Transport mode preferences, risk perception and worry in a Norwegian urban population.

机构信息

SINTEF, Transport Research, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.020
PMID:22795397
Abstract

The main aim of the present study was to compare risk perception among Norwegians (n=512) living in the region of Oslo. This study was part of an ERANET 13 project entitled PETRIS, Perception of transport risk in France and Norway. The data collection was carried out in January 2011. The response rate was 51 percent. The results showed that respondents, divided in two groups according to their transport mode preferences, assessed differently risk perception in public and private transportation. Respondents who preferred collective transportation assessed the probability of experiencing criminality in collective transport modes as higher than those who preferred private modes. They were also more worried of experiencing accidents, criminality, and terror attacks in collective transportation. The relationship between transport mode preferences and use, risk perception and worry are discussed.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是比较居住在奥斯陆地区的挪威人(n=512)的风险感知。这项研究是 ERANET 13 项目 PETRIS(法国和挪威对交通风险的感知)的一部分。数据收集于 2011 年 1 月进行,回复率为 51%。结果表明,根据他们对交通方式的偏好,将受访者分为两组,他们对公共和私人交通的风险感知评估不同。与偏好私人交通方式的受访者相比,选择集体交通方式的受访者认为在集体交通方式中经历犯罪的可能性更高。他们也更担心在集体交通中遭遇事故、犯罪和恐怖袭击。讨论了交通方式偏好与使用、风险感知和担忧之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Transport mode preferences, risk perception and worry in a Norwegian urban population.挪威城市人口的交通方式偏好、风险感知和担忧。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
2
Transport priorities, risk perception and worry associated with mode use and preferences among Norwegian commuters.挪威通勤者的交通优先级、风险认知以及与出行方式使用和偏好相关的担忧
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.028. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
3
Accidents and unpleasant incidents: worry in transport and prediction of travel behavior.事故与不愉快事件:交通中的担忧及出行行为预测
Risk Anal. 2009 Sep;29(9):1217-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01266.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
4
How accurately does the public perceive differences in transport risks? An exploratory analysis of scales representing perceived risk.公众对交通风险差异的认知有多准确?对代表感知风险的量表的探索性分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1005-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
5
Personality and risk perception in transport.人格与交通风险感知。
Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Nov;49:470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.017. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
6
Seasonal variation in risk perception and travel behaviour among cyclists in a Norwegian urban area.挪威一城区自行车骑行者风险感知和出行行为的季节性变化。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Mar;124:40-49. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.12.021. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
7
Perception of safety of cyclists in Dublin City.都柏林市自行车骑行者的安全感知。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:499-511. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.05.029. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
8
Risk perception, worry, and pedestrian behaviour in the Norwegian population.挪威人口的风险感知、担忧和行人行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Dec;133:105294. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105294. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
9
Mode choice model for vulnerable motorcyclists in Malaysia.马来西亚弱势摩托车骑行者的出行方式选择模型。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2006 Jun;7(2):150-4. doi: 10.1080/15389580600550354.
10
Contextual deprivation, daily travel and road traffic injuries among the young in the Rhône Département (France).语境剥夺、日常出行与罗纳省(法国)年轻人的道路交通伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2011 Sep;43(5):1617-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.02.003. Epub 2011 Apr 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Health Emergency Disaster Risk Management of Public Transport Systems: A Population-Based Study after the 2017 Subway Fire in Hong Kong, China.公共交通系统健康突发事件灾害风险管理:2017 年中国香港地铁火灾后的基于人群研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 15;16(2):228. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16020228.