• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威通勤者的交通优先级、风险认知以及与出行方式使用和偏好相关的担忧

Transport priorities, risk perception and worry associated with mode use and preferences among Norwegian commuters.

作者信息

Nordfjærn Trond, Simşekoğlu Özlem, Lind Hans Brende, Jørgensen Stig Halvard, Rundmo Torbjørn

机构信息

NTNU Samfunnsforskning, Studio Apertura, Dragvoll Allé 38 B, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.

Izmir University of Economics, Department of Psychology, Sakarya Caddesi, NO: 156, Balcova, 35330 Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.028. Epub 2014 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.028
PMID:25129446
Abstract

There is currently scant research on the role of transport priorities, risk perception and worry for travel mode use and preferences. The present study aims to examine these factors in relation to mode use and preferences among Norwegian commuters. A web-based survey was conducted in a randomly obtained representative sample of daily commuters in the extended greater Oslo area (n=690). The results showed that those who prioritized efficiency and flexibility tended to commute by car, while those who prioritized safety and comfort used public (e.g. metro, tram, and train) or active (e.g. walking and cycling) transport. In a free choice scenario, the respondents who prioritized flexibility reported a preference for using a car, whereas those who prioritized safety and comfort preferred public and active transport for their commuter travels. Risk perception of high impact events, such as terrorism and major accidents, as well as risk perception related to personal impact risks (theft, violence etc.) were related to car use on commuter travels. Transport-related worry exerted weak influences on mode use and preferences. Increased speed on rail transport and more frequent departures may be effective in reducing car use on commuter travels. Risk communication should focus on highlighting the low risk of experiencing security and safety issues in the public transport sector, and this message should be complemented by efforts to reduce the probability of negative events affecting public transport.

摘要

目前,关于交通优先级、风险认知和出行担忧对出行方式选择和偏好的作用的研究较少。本研究旨在考察挪威通勤者中这些因素与出行方式选择和偏好之间的关系。在大奥斯陆地区随机抽取了具有代表性的日常通勤者样本(n = 690)进行了一项基于网络的调查。结果显示,那些将效率和灵活性列为优先考虑因素的人倾向于开车通勤,而那些将安全和舒适度列为优先考虑因素的人则使用公共交通(如地铁、有轨电车和火车)或主动式交通(如步行和骑自行车)。在自由选择的情况下,将灵活性列为优先考虑因素的受访者表示更喜欢开车,而将安全和舒适度列为优先考虑因素的受访者则更喜欢在通勤时使用公共交通和主动式交通。对恐怖主义和重大事故等高影响事件的风险认知,以及与个人影响风险(盗窃、暴力等)相关的风险认知与通勤时开车有关。与交通相关的担忧对出行方式选择和偏好的影响较弱。提高铁路运输速度和增加发车频率可能有助于减少通勤时的汽车使用量。风险沟通应侧重于强调在公共交通部门遭遇安全问题的低风险,并且这一信息应辅以降低影响公共交通的负面事件发生概率的努力。

相似文献

1
Transport priorities, risk perception and worry associated with mode use and preferences among Norwegian commuters.挪威通勤者的交通优先级、风险认知以及与出行方式使用和偏好相关的担忧
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:391-400. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.028. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
2
Transport mode preferences, risk perception and worry in a Norwegian urban population.挪威城市人口的交通方式偏好、风险感知和担忧。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Jan;50:698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
3
How accurately does the public perceive differences in transport risks? An exploratory analysis of scales representing perceived risk.公众对交通风险差异的认知有多准确?对代表感知风险的量表的探索性分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Nov;37(6):1005-11. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.05.003. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
4
Traffic Safety Perception, Attitude, and Feeder Mode Choice of Metro Commute: Evidence from Shenzhen.地铁通勤的交通安全认知、态度及接驳方式选择:来自深圳的证据
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;17(24):9402. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249402.
5
Accidents and unpleasant incidents: worry in transport and prediction of travel behavior.事故与不愉快事件:交通中的担忧及出行行为预测
Risk Anal. 2009 Sep;29(9):1217-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01266.x. Epub 2009 Jul 23.
6
Association of injury related hospital admissions with commuting by bicycle in the UK: prospective population based study.英国与骑自行车通勤相关的伤害住院与前瞻性人群研究。
BMJ. 2020 Mar 11;368:m336. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m336.
7
The role of parental risk judgements, transport safety attitudes, transport priorities and accident experiences on pupils' walking to school.父母对风险的判断、对交通安全性的态度、对交通方式的重视程度以及事故经历对学生步行上学的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:60-71. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.020.
8
Changes in mode of travel to work: a natural experimental study of new transport infrastructure.通勤出行方式的变化:一项关于新交通基础设施的自然实验研究
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Jun 20;12:81. doi: 10.1186/s12966-015-0239-8.
9
Commuting and wellbeing in London: The roles of commute mode and local public transport connectivity.伦敦的通勤与福祉:通勤方式及当地公共交通可达性的作用
Prev Med. 2016 Jul;88:182-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 Apr 16.
10
Can Walking or Biking to Work Really Make a Difference? Compact Development, Observed Commuter Choice and Body Mass Index.步行或骑自行车上班真的会有不同吗?紧凑型发展、观察到的通勤选择与身体质量指数。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 8;10(7):e0130903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130903. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
The Contribution of Walking to School in Students' Physical Activity and Its Effect on Being Overweight.步行上学对学生身体活动的贡献及其对超重的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 6;2022:2633109. doi: 10.1155/2022/2633109. eCollection 2022.
2
User expectations and perceptions towards new public transport infrastructure: evaluating a cable car in Bogotá.用户对新公共交通基础设施的期望与认知:对波哥大一条缆车线路的评估
Transportation (Amst). 2023;50(3):751-771. doi: 10.1007/s11116-021-10260-x. Epub 2022 Jan 28.