• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): on track to compete with heart transplantation?长期机械循环支持(终末期治疗):有望与心脏移植相媲美?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):584-603; discussion 597-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
2
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database annual report: Evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断演变的适应证、结果和科学合作。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019 Feb;38(2):114-126. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2018.11.013.
3
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Database Annual Report: Evolving Indications, Outcomes, and Scientific Partnerships.《胸外科医师学会 Intermacs 数据库年度报告:不断变化的适应证、结果和科学合作》。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2019 Feb;107(2):341-353. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.11.011.
4
Postcardiac transplant survival in the current era in patients receiving continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.在当前接受连续流左心室辅助装置的患者中,心脏移植后的存活率。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;145(2):575-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.095.
5
Durability of left ventricular assist devices: Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) 2006 to 2011.左心室辅助装置的耐久性:机械循环辅助机构注册研究(INTERMACS)2006 年至 2011 年。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;146(2):437-41.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.02.018. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
6
Bridge to transplant experience: factors influencing survival to and after cardiac transplant.移植前桥接经验:影响心脏移植后存活的因素。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010 May;139(5):1295-305, 1305.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.12.006.
7
Results of the post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation: a prospective study using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).美国食品和药物管理局批准后使用连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接心脏移植的研究结果:一项使用 INTERMACS(机械循环辅助支持机构间注册)的前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 May 10;57(19):1890-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.062.
8
Results of the destination therapy post-food and drug administration approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: a prospective study using the INTERMACS registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).食品和药物管理局批准后连续血流左心室辅助装置治疗的结果:使用 INTERMACS 注册(机械辅助循环支持机构间注册)的前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 6;63(17):1751-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.053. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
9
Predictors of death and transplant in patients with a mechanical circulatory support device: a multi-institutional study.机械循环支持装置患者死亡和移植的预测因素:一项多机构研究。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jan;28(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2008.10.011. Epub 2008 Dec 12.
10
Adverse events in contemporary continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A multi-institutional comparison shows significant differences.当代连续血流左心室辅助装置中的不良事件:多机构比较显示出显著差异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):177-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.100. Epub 2015 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy for advanced heart failure: systematic review and economic evaluation.左心室辅助装置作为晚期心力衰竭的终末期治疗的临床和成本效益:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(38):1-237. doi: 10.3310/MLFA4009.
2
Myocardial Recovery versus Myocardial Regeneration: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Modulation.心肌修复与心肌再生:机制与治疗调节。
Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2024 Aug 20;20(4):31-41. doi: 10.14797/mdcvj.1400. eCollection 2024.
3
Developments and Challenges in Durable Ventricular Assist Device Technology: A Comprehensive Review with a Focus on Advancements in China.耐用型心室辅助装置技术的发展与挑战:聚焦中国进展的综合综述
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Jan 18;11(1):29. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11010029.
4
Forensic, legal, and clinical aspects of deaths associated with implanted cardiac devices.与植入式心脏设备相关死亡的法医学、法律及临床方面
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 28;14:1278078. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1278078. eCollection 2023.
5
Hemocompatibility and biophysical interface of left ventricular assist devices and total artificial hearts.左心室辅助装置和全人工心脏的血液相容性和生物物理界面。
Blood. 2024 Feb 22;143(8):661-672. doi: 10.1182/blood.2022018096.
6
Preoperative atrial fibrillation predicts worse outcomes after LVAD implantation.术前房颤预示着左心室辅助装置植入术后预后更差。
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2022;14(3):166-171. doi: 10.34172/jcvtr.2022.29. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
7
Successful conservative management of left ventricular assist device candidates.左心室辅助装置候选者的成功保守治疗。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Feb;10(1):601-615. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14223. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
8
Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Patients With Heart Failure From Before to Early After Advanced Surgical Therapies: Findings From the SUSTAIN-IT Study.老年心力衰竭患者接受高级外科治疗前后的健康相关生活质量:来自 SUSTAIN-IT 研究的结果。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 Oct;15(10):e009579. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.122.009579. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
9
Baseline Quality-of-Life of Caregivers of Patients With Heart Failure Prior to Advanced Therapies: Findings From the Sustaining Quality of Life of the Aged: Transplant or Mechanical Support (SUSTAIN-IT) Study.心力衰竭患者接受先进治疗前的照顾者基线生活质量:来自维持老年患者生活质量:移植或机械支持(SUSTAIN-IT)研究的结果。
J Card Fail. 2022 Jul;28(7):1137-1148. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2022.03.358. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
10
Control Strategy Design of a Microblood Pump Based on Heart-Rate Feedback.基于心率反馈的微型血泵控制策略设计
Micromachines (Basel). 2022 Feb 24;13(3):358. doi: 10.3390/mi13030358.

本文引用的文献

1
The Fourth INTERMACS Annual Report: 4,000 implants and counting.《第四份 INTERMACS 年度报告:4000 例植入,且仍在增加》。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2012 Feb;31(2):117-26. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.12.001.
2
Outcomes in advanced heart failure patients with left ventricular assist devices for destination therapy.用于终末期心力衰竭的左心室辅助装置治疗的晚期心力衰竭患者的结局。
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):241-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.963991. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
3
HeartWare continuous-flow ventricular assist device thrombosis: the Bad Oeynhausen experience.HeartWare连续血流心室辅助装置血栓形成:巴特奥伊瑙森的经验
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Apr;143(4):e37-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.035. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
4
The Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: Twenty-eighth Adult Heart Transplant Report--2011.国际心肺移植学会登记处:2011年第28份成人心脏移植报告
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Oct;30(10):1078-94. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2011.08.003.
5
Results of the post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation: a prospective study using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).美国食品和药物管理局批准后使用连续血流左心室辅助装置桥接心脏移植的研究结果:一项使用 INTERMACS(机械循环辅助支持机构间注册)的前瞻性研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 May 10;57(19):1890-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.10.062.
6
Third INTERMACS Annual Report: the evolution of destination therapy in the United States.第三届 INTERMACS 年度报告:美国心脏移植终点治疗的演变。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Feb;30(2):115-23. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.12.001.
7
Health-related quality of life and exercise tolerance in recipients of heart transplants and left ventricular assist devices: a prospective, comparative study.心脏移植和左心室辅助装置受者的健康相关生活质量和运动耐量:一项前瞻性、比较研究。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011 Feb;30(2):204-10. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.08.030. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
8
INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support): a new paradigm for translating registry data into clinical practice.INTERMACS(机械辅助循环支持跨部门注册登记处):将注册登记数据转化为临床实践的新范例。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Aug 24;56(9):738-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.05.021.
9
Improved quantity and quality of life: a winning combination to treat advanced heart failure.改善生活质量与数量:治疗晚期心力衰竭的成功组合。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 27;55(17):1835-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.010.
10
Continuous flow left ventricular assist device improves functional capacity and quality of life of advanced heart failure patients.连续流动左心室辅助装置可改善晚期心力衰竭患者的功能能力和生活质量。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 27;55(17):1826-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.052.

长期机械循环支持(终末期治疗):有望与心脏移植相媲美?

Long-term mechanical circulatory support (destination therapy): on track to compete with heart transplantation?

机构信息

Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012 Sep;144(3):584-603; discussion 597-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jul 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.05.044
PMID:22795459
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3443856/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Average 2-year survival after cardiac transplantation is approximately 80%. The evolution and subsequent approval of larger pulsatile and, more recently, continuous flow mechanical circulatory support (MCS) technology for destination therapy (DT) offers the potential for triage of some patients awaiting cardiac transplantation to DT.

METHODS

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) is a national multi-institutional study of long-term MCS. Between June 2006 and December 2011, 127 pulsatile and 1160 continuous flow pumps (24% of total primary left ventricular assist devices [LVADs]) carried an initial strategy of DT therapy.

RESULTS

By multivariable analysis, risk factors (P < .05) for mortality after DT included older age, larger body mass index, history of cancer, history of cardiac surgery, INTERMACS level I (cardiogenic shock), dialysis, increased blood urea nitrogen, use of a pulsatile flow device, and use of a right ventricular assist device (RVAD). Among patients with a continuous flow LVAD who were not in cardiogenic shock, a particularly favorable survival was associated with no cancer, patients not in cardiogenic shock, and blood urea nitrogen less than 50 mg/dL, resulting in 1- and 2-year survivals of 88% and 80%.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) Evolution from pulsatile to continuous flow technology has dramatically improved 1- and 2-year survivals; (2) DT is not appropriate for patients with rapid hemodynamic deterioration or severe right ventricular failure; (3) important subsets of patients with continuous flow DT now enjoy survival that is competitive with heart transplantation out to about 2 years.

摘要

目的

心脏移植后的平均 2 年生存率约为 80%。脉动和最近连续流动机械循环支持(MCS)技术的发展和随后的批准,为等待心脏移植的患者提供了将部分患者进行心脏移植的治疗方法(DT)的潜在治疗选择。

方法

国家心脏、肺和血液研究所机械循环支持机构间注册处(INTERMACS)是一项关于长期 MCS 的国家多机构研究。在 2006 年 6 月至 2011 年 12 月期间,127 个脉动泵和 1160 个连续流泵(占总左心室辅助装置[LVAD]的 24%)最初采用 DT 治疗策略。

结果

通过多变量分析,DT 后死亡率的危险因素(P <.05)包括年龄较大、体重指数较大、癌症史、心脏手术史、INTERMACS 级别 I(心源性休克)、透析、血尿素氮升高、使用脉动流设备和右心室辅助装置(RVAD)。在非心源性休克的连续流 LVAD 患者中,没有癌症、非心源性休克和血尿素氮低于 50mg/dL 的患者,生存率特别有利,1 年和 2 年生存率分别为 88%和 80%。

结论

(1)从脉动到连续流动技术的发展极大地提高了 1 年和 2 年的生存率;(2)DT 不适合那些有快速血流动力学恶化或严重右心衰竭的患者;(3)具有连续流 DT 的重要亚组患者现在的生存率与心脏移植的生存率竞争,时间约为 2 年。