Suppr超能文献

快速诊断呼吸道病原体多重实时 RT-PCR 检测与内部单重检测在全面检测人类呼吸道病毒中的比较。

Comparison of fast-track diagnostics respiratory pathogens multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay with in-house singleplex assays for comprehensive detection of human respiratory viruses.

机构信息

Division of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

J Virol Methods. 2012 Nov;185(2):259-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Jul 11.

Abstract

Fast-track Diagnostics respiratory pathogens (FTDRP) multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay was compared with in-house singleplex real-time RT-PCR assays for detection of 16 common respiratory viruses. The FTDRP assay correctly identified 26 diverse respiratory virus strains, 35 of 41 (85%) external quality assessment samples spiked with cultured virus and 232 of 263 (88%) archived respiratory specimens that tested positive for respiratory viruses by in-house assays. Of 308 prospectively tested respiratory specimens selected from children hospitalized with acute respiratory illness, 270 (87.7%) and 265 (86%) were positive by FTDRP and in-house assays for one or more viruses, respectively, with combined test results showing good concordance (K=0.812, 95% CI=0.786-0.838). Individual FTDRP assays for adenovirus, respiratory syncytial virus and rhinovirus showed the lowest comparative sensitivities with in-house assays, with most discrepancies occurring with specimens containing low virus loads and failed to detect some rhinovirus strains, even when abundant. The FTDRP enterovirus and human bocavirus assays appeared to be more sensitive than the in-house assays with some specimens. With the exceptions noted above, most FTDRP assays performed comparably with in-house assays for most viruses while offering enhanced throughput and easy integration by laboratories using conventional real-time PCR instrumentation.

摘要

快速诊断呼吸道病原体(FTDRP)多重实时 RT-PCR 检测法与内部单重实时 RT-PCR 检测法相比,可用于检测 16 种常见呼吸道病毒。FTDRP 检测法正确识别了 26 种不同的呼吸道病毒株,41 份外部质量评估样本中,35 份(85%)用培养病毒接种的样本和 263 份(88%)存档呼吸道样本中,232 份(88%)经内部检测法检测为呼吸道病毒阳性的样本。在 308 份从因急性呼吸道疾病住院的儿童中前瞻性检测的呼吸道样本中,FTDRP 和内部检测法分别对 270 份(87.7%)和 265 份(86%)样本检测出一种或多种病毒呈阳性,两种检测方法的联合检测结果具有良好的一致性(K=0.812,95%CI=0.786-0.838)。FTDRP 腺病毒、呼吸道合胞病毒和鼻病毒检测法与内部检测法相比敏感性最低,大多数差异出现在病毒载量低的样本中,并且未能检测到一些鼻病毒株,即使样本中病毒含量丰富也未能检测到。FTDRP 肠道病毒和人类博卡病毒检测法与内部检测法相比,在某些样本中似乎更敏感。除了上述例外情况,大多数 FTDRP 检测法与内部检测法相比,对大多数病毒的检测性能相当,同时提高了检测通量,并方便了使用常规实时 PCR 仪器的实验室进行整合。

相似文献

7
Evaluation of real-time RT-PCR Rhino&EV/Cc r-gene(®) (bioMérieux) kit versions 1 and 2 for rhinovirus detection.
J Clin Virol. 2015 Jan;62:110-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2014.10.019. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
9
Evaluation of the Cepheid respiratory syncytial virus and influenza virus A/B real-time PCR analyte specific reagent.
J Virol Methods. 2009 Dec;162(1-2):88-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.07.020. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
10
Evaluation of a multiplex real-time PCR assay for the detection of respiratory viruses in clinical specimens.
Ann Lab Med. 2012 Nov;32(6):399-406. doi: 10.3343/alm.2012.32.6.399. Epub 2012 Oct 17.

引用本文的文献

7
Distribution of respiratory viruses: Evaluation of multiplex PCR results of 3074 patients.
North Clin Istanb. 2022 Oct 26;9(5):501-504. doi: 10.14744/nci.2021.28034. eCollection 2022.
8
Surveillance for Acute Respiratory Illnesses in Pediatric Chronic Care Facilities.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2023 Feb 9;12(1):49-52. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piac109.
10
The importance of viral load in the severity of acute bronchiolitis in hospitalized infants.
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 Dec 6;76:e3192. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2021/e3192. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospitalization due to human parainfluenza virus-associated lower respiratory tract illness in rural Thailand.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2013 May;7(3):280-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2012.00393.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
5
Comparison of two multiplex methods for detection of respiratory viruses: FilmArray RP and xTAG RVP.
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jul;49(7):2449-53. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02582-10. Epub 2011 Apr 20.
6
Application of TaqMan low-density arrays for simultaneous detection of multiple respiratory pathogens.
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Jun;49(6):2175-82. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02270-10. Epub 2011 Apr 6.
7
Multiplex PCR and emerging technologies for the detection of respiratory pathogens.
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S326-30. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir047.
8
Viral infections of the lower respiratory tract: old viruses, new viruses, and the role of diagnosis.
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 May;52 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S284-9. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir043.
10
Comparative evaluation of Taqman real-time PCR and semi-nested VP1 PCR for detection of enteroviruses in clinical specimens.
J Clin Virol. 2010 Sep;49(1):73-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.06.022. Epub 2010 Jul 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验