Department of Anesthesiology, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, New York, NY 10025, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2012 Oct;115(4):963-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318265ba9a. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
During peripheral nerve blockade, different local anesthetics may be sequentially administered. Typically, a short- or intermediate-acting local anesthetic is administered before a long-acting local anesthetic to achieve a block with rapid onset and long duration. However, there is a paucity of data on advantages of such sequencing. We hypothesized that when using a sequential mixture of mepivacaine and bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided interscalene block, the order of injection of the drugs does not influence the clinical characteristics of the block achieved.
Sixty-four patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery (aged 18-65 years; ASA physical status I-II) with a single-injection ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block as sole anesthetic were studied. The subjects were randomized to receive 1 of 2 local anesthetic sequences: 15 mL of mepivacaine 1.5% followed by 15 mL of bupivacaine 0.5% (group A), or the same local anesthetics in the reverse order (group B). The durations of sensory and motor block were the primary outcomes. Block onset was also assessed.
Duration of motor block was similar between group A and group B (10.1 ± 4.7 hours vs 10.3 ± 5.1 hours, mean difference 0.2 hours, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.3 to 2.9, P = 0.9). Duration of analgesia was also similar between group A and group B (9.5 ± 5.6 hours vs 10.2 ± 4.5 hours, mean difference 0.7 hours, 95% CI -3.2 to 1.9, P = 0.42). Onset of sensory block was similar between the 2 groups (15.9 ± 7.1 minutes for group A, 13.9 ± 7.0 minutes for group B, mean difference 1.9 minutes, 95% CI -1.4 to 5.2, P = 0.25).
The sequence in which 15 mL mepivacaine 1.5% and 15 mL bupivacaine 0.5% are administered does not seem to have a clinically meaningful effect on duration or onset of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block.
在周围神经阻滞时,可能会先后给予不同的局部麻醉药。通常,在给予长效局部麻醉药之前给予短效或中效局部麻醉药,以实现起效迅速和持续时间长的阻滞。然而,关于这种顺序的优势的数据很少。我们假设,在使用甲哌卡因和布比卡因的序贯混合物进行超声引导下肩胛上神经阻滞时,药物注射的顺序不会影响所达到的阻滞的临床特征。
研究了 64 例接受超声引导下肩胛上神经臂丛阻滞的择期肩关节镜手术患者(年龄 18-65 岁;ASA 身体状况 I-II 级),单次注射。将患者随机分为接受以下 2 种局部麻醉药顺序中的 1 种:15 mL 1.5%甲哌卡因后接 15 mL 0.5%布比卡因(A 组),或相同的局部麻醉药以相反的顺序(B 组)。感觉和运动阻滞的持续时间是主要结局。还评估了阻滞的起效时间。
A 组和 B 组的运动阻滞持续时间相似(10.1 ± 4.7 小时对 10.3 ± 5.1 小时,平均差值 0.2 小时,95%置信区间 [CI] -3.3 至 2.9,P = 0.9)。A 组和 B 组的镇痛持续时间也相似(9.5 ± 5.6 小时对 10.2 ± 4.5 小时,平均差值 0.7 小时,95%CI -3.2 至 1.9,P = 0.42)。两组的感觉阻滞起效时间相似(A 组 15.9 ± 7.1 分钟,B 组 13.9 ± 7.0 分钟,平均差值 1.9 分钟,95%CI -1.4 至 5.2,P = 0.25)。
15 mL 1.5%甲哌卡因和 15 mL 0.5%布比卡因的给药顺序似乎对超声引导下肩胛上神经臂丛阻滞的持续时间或起效没有临床意义的影响。