• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心理学与社会正义:我们为何而做。

Psychology and social justice: why we do what we do.

机构信息

Anderson House at Heritage Square, 2901 Bee Cave Road, Box N, Austin, TX 78746, USA.

出版信息

Am Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;67(5):337-46. doi: 10.1037/a0029232.

DOI:10.1037/a0029232
PMID:22800101
Abstract

Much of psychological science and knowledge is significantly relevant to social justice, defined here as the goal to decrease human suffering and to promote human values of equality and justice. A commitment to social justice has evolved as a more important value in the last few decades for psychology, including for the American Psychological Association (APA). The mission, vision, goals, Ethics Code, and strategic plan of APA all provide a rationale for psychologists' involvement in systematic and visible ways of applying our knowledge to social issues. Although psychology has not been immune to the application of psychological knowledge in destructive ways, overall, psychology, many psychologists, and APA have demonstrated a commitment to social justice. This article provides a brief review of the key proponents, debates, and controversies involved in applying psychological science and knowledge to complex societal problems. Psychologists often find themselves in conflict and honest disagreement when the association addresses complex and controversial issues. An important goal is that we continue to find ways to agree or disagree in a respectful manner regardless of where each of us stands on the various positions that APA takes.

摘要

心理学的大部分科学知识与社会正义密切相关,这里将社会正义定义为减少人类苦难和促进平等与正义等人类价值观的目标。几十年来,心理学(包括美国心理协会)越来越重视社会正义,将其视为一项更重要的价值观。美国心理协会的使命、愿景、目标、道德准则和战略计划都为心理学家以系统和可见的方式将我们的知识应用于社会问题提供了理由。尽管心理学在以破坏性的方式应用心理学知识方面并非无懈可击,但总的来说,心理学、许多心理学家和美国心理协会都表现出对社会正义的承诺。本文简要回顾了将心理学科学知识应用于复杂社会问题的主要支持者、争论和争议。当协会处理复杂和有争议的问题时,心理学家往往会发现自己陷入冲突和坦诚的分歧之中。一个重要的目标是,我们继续找到以尊重的方式达成一致或不同意的方法,而不论我们每个人在协会采取的各种立场上的立场如何。

相似文献

1
Psychology and social justice: why we do what we do.心理学与社会正义:我们为何而做。
Am Psychol. 2012 Jul-Aug;67(5):337-46. doi: 10.1037/a0029232.
2
Militarism, human welfare, and the APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists.军国主义、人类福祉与美国心理学会心理学家伦理原则
Ethics Behav. 1992;2(4):287-310. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0204_5.
3
When the political is professional: Civil disobedience in psychology.当政治变得专业化:心理学中的公民抗命。
Am Psychol. 2021 Nov;76(8):1217-1231. doi: 10.1037/amp0000867.
4
Are illiberal acts unethical? APA's Ethics Code and the protection of free speech.不自由的行为是否不道德?APA 伦理准则与言论自由的保护。
Am Psychol. 2022 Nov;77(8):875-886. doi: 10.1037/amp0000995. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
5
Social justice and the politics of recognition.社会正义与承认的政治。
Am Psychol. 2013 Sep;68(6):475-6. doi: 10.1037/a0033596.
6
2010 Amendments to the 2002 "Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct".2010 年对 2002 年《心理学家的伦理原则和行为准则》的修订。
Am Psychol. 2010 Jul-Aug;65(5):493. doi: 10.1037/a0020168.
7
The science of ethics: Deception, the resilient self, and the APA code of ethics, 1966-1973.伦理学的科学:欺骗、坚韧的自我与美国心理学会伦理守则,1966 - 1973年
J Hist Behav Sci. 2010 Fall;46(4):337-70. doi: 10.1002/jhbs.20468.
8
Utilitarianism and the ethics of professional psychologists.功利主义与专业心理学家的伦理道德
Ethics Behav. 1999;9(4):383-92. doi: 10.1207/s15327019eb0904_7.
9
Collusion, torture, and inequality: Understanding the actions of the American Psychological Association as institutional betrayal.勾结、折磨与不平等:将美国心理学会的行为理解为机构性背叛。
J Trauma Dissociation. 2016 Oct-Dec;17(5):527-544. doi: 10.1080/15299732.2016.1214436.
10
Revision of Ethical Standard 3.04 of the "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct" (2002, as amended 2010).修订《心理学家的伦理原则和行为准则》(2002 年,2010 年修订)中的伦理标准 3.04。
Am Psychol. 2016 Dec;71(9):900. doi: 10.1037/amp0000102.

引用本文的文献

1
Macropsychology: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Psychology Literature on Public Policy and Law.宏观心理学:对公共政策与法律相关心理学文献的系统综述
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 12;15(3):350. doi: 10.3390/bs15030350.
2
Destigmatizing borderline personality disorder with social justice and intersectional cultural humility: How researchers can construct and deconstruct stigma.通过社会正义和交叉文化谦逊消除边缘性人格障碍的污名:研究人员如何构建和消除污名。
Fem Psychol. 2025 Feb;35(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/09593535241278213. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
3
Aligning values with standards: a comparison of professional values in Continuing Education standards.
使价值观与标准保持一致:继续教育标准中的专业价值观比较
Ethics Behav. 2024;34(8):597-610. doi: 10.1080/10508422.2023.2266074. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
4
Training Psychology and Psychiatry Diversity Dialogue Facilitators.培训心理学和精神病学多样性对话促进者。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2024 Jun;31(2):292-303. doi: 10.1007/s10880-023-09978-w. Epub 2023 Nov 6.
5
Toward a socially just diversity science: Using intersectional mixed methods research to center multiply marginalized Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC).迈向社会公正的多样性科学:运用交叉混合方法研究,关注多重边缘化的黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2023 Jan;29(1):34-42. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000477. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
6
Translating research to support practitioners in addressing disparities in child and adolescent mental health and services in the United States.将研究成果转化为实践,以支持解决美国儿童和青少年心理健康及服务方面的差异。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2019 Jan;25(1):126-135. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000257.