Neurology Stroke Center, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Aug;19(2 Suppl):18-24. doi: 10.1177/2047487312448990.
Carotid intima-media thickness assessed by ultrasonography of carotid arteries is a safe, non-expensive, feasible and accurate method for detecting early signs of atherosclerosis and carotid intima-media thickness and change in carotid intima-media thickness over time reflect cardiovascular disease risk. Technical aspects impact on the measurement, variability and interpretation of carotid intima-media thickness. These include device aspects, inter- and intra-sonographer variability and the ultrasound protocol used. The mean common carotid intima-media thickness and the mean maximum common carotid intima-media thickness are the most widely used carotid intima-media thickness measurements. Common carotid intima-media thickness values of around 0.5 mm are considered 'normal' in young adults. Values are higher in men than in women, in African-Americans than Caucasians and increase with age. Carotid intima-media thickness values at or above the 75th percentile of a reference population indicate increased cardiovascular risk. Guidelines differ in their recommendations for the use of carotid intima-media thickness measurements for risk assessment in primary prevention because evidence suggesting that it improves upon conventional risk scores is inconsistent. Carotid intima-media thickness is frequently used in clinical trials as a surrogate endpoint for cardiovascular events on the assumption that regression or slowed progression of carotid intima-media thickness, induced by cardiovascular risk interventions, reflects a reduction in cardiovascular events. However, further data are required to confirm this linear relationship. No international guidelines exist on the use of carotid intima-media thickness as a research tool. Quality control in acquisition, measurement and interpretation of carotid intima-media thickness are important considerations and the carotid intima-media thickness protocol used should be determined by the research question under investigation.
通过颈动脉超声评估颈动脉内膜中层厚度是一种安全、经济、可行且准确的方法,可用于检测动脉粥样硬化和颈动脉内膜中层厚度的早期迹象,颈动脉内膜中层厚度的变化和随时间的变化反映了心血管疾病的风险。技术方面会影响颈动脉内膜中层厚度的测量、变异性和解释。这些因素包括设备方面、超声医师间和超声医师内的变异性以及所使用的超声协议。最广泛使用的颈动脉内膜中层厚度测量值是颈总动脉平均内膜中层厚度和颈总动脉最大内膜中层厚度。在年轻成年人中,约 0.5mm 的颈总动脉内膜中层厚度值被认为是“正常”的。男性的颈总动脉内膜中层厚度值高于女性,非裔美国人高于白种人,并且随年龄增长而增加。在参考人群中,颈动脉内膜中层厚度值达到或高于第 75 百分位数表明心血管风险增加。由于表明其能提高传统风险评分的证据不一致,因此指南在建议将颈动脉内膜中层厚度测量值用于一级预防中的风险评估方面存在差异。颈动脉内膜中层厚度经常在临床试验中用作心血管事件的替代终点,假设心血管风险干预引起的颈动脉内膜中层厚度的回归或进展减缓反映了心血管事件的减少。然而,需要进一步的数据来证实这种线性关系。目前没有关于将颈动脉内膜中层厚度用作研究工具的国际指南。颈动脉内膜中层厚度的获取、测量和解释的质量控制是重要的考虑因素,所使用的颈动脉内膜中层厚度协议应根据研究问题来确定。