a Utrecht University , The Netherlands.
Psychol Health. 2001 Sep;16(5):565-82. doi: 10.1080/08870440108405527.
Abstract Current knowledge about burnout suffers from a healthy worker bias since only working - and thus relatively healthy - employees have been investigated. The main objective of this study is to examine - for the first time among employees who sought psychological treatment - the validity of the two most widely used burnout instruments; the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) and the Burnout Measure (BM). Two groups were distinguished: a "burned out" group (n = 71) that suffers from work-related neurasthenia (according to ICD-10 criteria), and a "non-burned out" group (n = 68). Results show that: (1) the validity of the three-factor structure of the MBI and the BM is confirmed; (2) burnout can partly be differentiated from other mental syndromes (e.g., anxiety and depression); and (3) two MBI-scales (Emotional Exhaustion and Depersonalization) and one BM-scale (Exhaustion) are able to discriminate between burned out and non-burned out employees. The practical implications of these results are discussed.
摘要 当前有关职业倦怠的知识存在健康工人偏差,因为仅对工作且相对健康的员工进行了调查。本研究的主要目的是首次在寻求心理治疗的员工中检验两种使用最广泛的倦怠工具(MBI 和 BM)的有效性。将两组区分开来:一组是患有工作相关神经衰弱(根据 ICD-10 标准)的“倦怠”组(n=71),另一组是“非倦怠”组(n=68)。结果表明:(1)MBI 和 BM 的三因素结构的有效性得到了证实;(2)倦怠可以部分地区分其他精神综合征(例如焦虑和抑郁);(3)MBI 的两个量表(情绪衰竭和去人格化)和 BM 的一个量表(疲劳)能够区分倦怠和非倦怠的员工。讨论了这些结果的实际意义。