Suppr超能文献

人骨髓浓缩物与富血小板血浆的骨再生能力的体内比较。

In vivo comparison of the bone regeneration capability of human bone marrow concentrates vs. platelet-rich plasma.

机构信息

Department of Regenerative Oral Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040833. Epub 2012 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) including high densities of stem cells and progenitor cells may possess a stronger bone regenerative capability compared with Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), which contains enriched growth factors. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of human BMAC and PRP in combination with β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) on promoting initial bone augmentation in an immunodeficient mouse model.

METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: BMAC and PRP were concentrated with an automated blood separator from the bone marrow and peripheral blood aspirates. β-TCP particles were employed as a scaffold to carry cells. After cell counting and FACS characterization, three groups of nude mice (BMAC+TCP, PRP+TCP, and a TCP control) were implanted with graft materials for onlay placement on the cranium. Samples were harvested after 4 weeks, and serial sections were prepared. We observed the new bone on light microscopy and performed histomorphometric analysis. After centrifugation, the concentrations of nucleated cells and platelets in BMAC were increased by factors of 2.8 ± 0.8 and 5.3 ± 2.4, respectively, whereas leucocytes and platelets in PRP were increased by factors of 4.1 ± 1.8 and 4.4 ± 1.9, respectively. The concentrations of CD34-, CD271-, CD90-, CD105-, and CD146-positive cells were markedly increased in both BMAC and PRP. The percentage of new bone in the BMAC group (7.6 ± 3.9%) and the PRP group (7.2 ± 3.8%) were significantly higher than that of TCP group (2.7 ± 1.4%). Significantly more bone cells in the new bone occurred in sites transplanted with BMAC (552 ± 257) and PRP (491 ± 211) compared to TCP alone (187 ± 94). But the difference between the treatment groups was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Both human BMACs and PRP may provide therapeutic benefits in bone tissue engineering applications. These fractions possess a similar ability to enhance early-phase bone regeneration.

摘要

背景

骨髓抽吸浓缩物(BMAC)包括高密度的干细胞和祖细胞,与富含生长因子的富血小板血浆(PRP)相比,可能具有更强的骨再生能力。本研究的目的是评估人 BMAC 和 PRP 与β-磷酸三钙(β-TCP)联合应用于免疫缺陷小鼠模型中促进初始骨增量的效果。

方法/主要发现:从骨髓和外周血抽吸物中使用自动血液分离机浓缩 BMAC 和 PRP。β-TCP 颗粒被用作携带细胞的支架。细胞计数和 FACS 鉴定后,三组裸鼠(BMAC+TCP、PRP+TCP 和 TCP 对照组)接受移植材料用于颅顶覆盖式植入。4 周后采集样本,制备连续切片。我们观察了光镜下的新骨,并进行了组织形态计量学分析。离心后,BMAC 中的有核细胞和血小板浓度分别增加了 2.8±0.8 倍和 5.3±2.4 倍,而 PRP 中的白细胞和血小板浓度分别增加了 4.1±1.8 倍和 4.4±1.9 倍。BMAC 和 PRP 中 CD34-、CD271-、CD90-、CD105-和 CD146-阳性细胞的浓度明显增加。BMAC 组(7.6±3.9%)和 PRP 组(7.2±3.8%)的新骨百分比明显高于 TCP 组(2.7±1.4%)。与单独使用 TCP 相比,BMAC(552±257)和 PRP(491±211)移植部位的新骨中骨细胞数量明显更多(187±94)。但治疗组之间的差异无统计学意义。

结论/意义:人 BMAC 和 PRP 都可能在骨组织工程应用中提供治疗益处。这些细胞成分具有相似的增强早期骨再生的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2791/3395629/b4f01172a9e4/pone.0040833.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验