• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在对照实验中检测协变量的不平衡

Testing for imbalance of covariates in controlled experiments.

作者信息

Permutt T

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore 21201.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1990 Dec;9(12):1455-62. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780091209.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780091209
PMID:2281233
Abstract

Results of a controlled experiment are often adjusted for covariates found by a preliminary test to differ significantly between the treatment and control groups. The resulting test's true significance level is lower than the nominal level. Greater power can be achieved by always adjusting for a covariate that is highly correlated with the response regardless of its distribution between groups.

摘要

对照实验的结果通常会针对初步测试中发现的协变量进行调整,这些协变量在治疗组和对照组之间存在显著差异。由此产生的检验的真实显著性水平低于名义水平。无论协变量在组间的分布如何,始终对与反应高度相关的协变量进行调整,可以获得更大的检验效能。

相似文献

1
Testing for imbalance of covariates in controlled experiments.在对照实验中检测协变量的不平衡
Stat Med. 1990 Dec;9(12):1455-62. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780091209.
2
Clinical trials: how to assess confounding and why so.临床试验:如何评估混杂因素以及为何要这样做。
Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2007 May;2(2):129-33. doi: 10.2174/157488407780598162.
3
Continuous covariate imbalance and conditional power for clinical trial interim analyses.用于临床试验期中分析的连续协变量不平衡与条件效能
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 May;38(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
4
Randomized controlled trials with time-to-event outcomes: how much does prespecified covariate adjustment increase power?具有事件发生时间结局的随机对照试验:预先指定的协变量调整能增加多少检验效能?
Ann Epidemiol. 2006 Jan;16(1):41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2005.09.007. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
5
Comparison of covariate selection methods with correlated covariates: prior information versus data information, or a mixture of both?比较具有相关协变量的协变量选择方法:使用先验信息还是数据信息,或者两者的混合?
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2020 Oct;47(5):485-492. doi: 10.1007/s10928-020-09700-5. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
6
Covariate balance for no confounding in the sufficient-cause model.协变量在充分病因模型中无混杂的均衡。
Ann Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;28(1):48-53.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
7
Covariate adjustment in randomized controlled trials with dichotomous outcomes increases statistical power and reduces sample size requirements.在具有二分结局的随机对照试验中进行协变量调整可提高统计效能并减少样本量需求。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2004 May;57(5):454-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2003.09.014.
8
Covariate adjustments in randomized controlled trials increased study power and reduced biasedness of effect size estimation.随机对照试验中的协变量调整提高了研究效能,并降低了效应大小估计的偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:137-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
9
[Propensity score methods for creating covariate balance in observational studies].[用于在观察性研究中实现协变量平衡的倾向评分方法]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011 Oct;64(10):897-903. doi: 10.1016/j.recesp.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
10
[Analysis and importance of statistical power and sample size in empirical scientific research].[实证科学研究中统计功效与样本量的分析及重要性]
Wiad Lek. 2008;61(7-9):211-5.

引用本文的文献

1
When does adjusting covariate under randomization help? A comparative study on current practices.随机化时调整协变量有何帮助?对现行实践的比较研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Oct 26;24(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02375-3.
2
Discussion on "Improving precision and power in randomized trials for COVID-19 treatments using covariate adjustment, for binary, ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes" by David Benkeser, Ivan Diaz, Alex Luedtke, Jodi Segal, Daniel Scharfstein, and Michael Rosenblum.大卫·本克泽、伊万·迪亚兹、亚历克斯·吕德克、乔迪·西格尔、丹尼尔·沙夫斯坦和迈克尔·罗森布卢姆所著《利用协变量调整提高新冠治疗随机试验中针对二元、有序和事件发生时间结局的精度和效能》的讨论
Biometrics. 2021 Dec;77(4):1489-1491. doi: 10.1111/biom.13494. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
3
Randomized Effectiveness Trial of the New Beginnings Program for Divorced Families with Children and Adolescents.新起点计划对离异家庭中儿童和青少年的随机有效性试验。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2020 Jan-Feb;49(1):60-78. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2018.1540008. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
4
Assessment of P values for demographic data in randomized controlled trials.随机对照试验中人口统计学数据 P 值的评估。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019 Apr;72(2):130-134. doi: 10.4097/kja.d.18.00333. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
5
Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments.随机试验中治疗效果估计的套索调整
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7383-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510506113.
6
Improving massive experiments with threshold blocking.通过阈值阻断改进大规模实验。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jul 5;113(27):7369-76. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1510504113.
7
Evidence-based care of older people with suspected cognitive impairment in general practice: protocol for the IRIS cluster randomised trial.基于证据的全科医学中疑似认知障碍老年人的护理:IRIS 集群随机试验方案。
Implement Sci. 2013 Aug 19;8:91. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-91.
8
A tutorial on methods to estimating clinically and policy-meaningful measures of treatment effects in prospective observational studies: a review.前瞻性观察性研究中估计治疗效果的临床和政策意义测量方法教程:综述
Int J Biostat. 2011;7(1):6. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1285. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
9
Robust extraction of covariate information to improve estimation efficiency in randomized trials.稳健地提取协变量信息,以提高随机试验中的估计效率。
Stat Med. 2011 Aug 30;30(19):2389-408. doi: 10.1002/sim.4301. Epub 2011 Jul 12.
10
The albumin in acute stroke (ALIAS) multicenter clinical trial: safety analysis of part 1 and rationale and design of part 2.急性脑卒中(ALIAS)多中心临床试验中的白蛋白:第 1 部分的安全性分析及第 2 部分的原理和设计。
Stroke. 2011 Jan;42(1):119-27. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.596072. Epub 2010 Dec 16.