Ciolino Jody D, Martin Renee' H, Zhao Wenle, Jauch Edward C, Hill Michael D, Palesch Yuko Y
Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 May;38(1):9-18. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.02.007. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
Oftentimes valid statistical analyses for clinical trials involve adjustment for known influential covariates, regardless of imbalance observed in these covariates at baseline across treatment groups. Thus, it must be the case that valid interim analyses also properly adjust for these covariates. There are situations, however, in which covariate adjustment is not possible, not planned, or simply carries less merit as it makes inferences less generalizable and less intuitive. In this case, covariate imbalance between treatment groups can have a substantial effect on both interim and final primary outcome analyses. This paper illustrates the effect of influential continuous baseline covariate imbalance on unadjusted conditional power (CP), and thus, on trial decisions based on futility stopping bounds. The robustness of the relationship is illustrated for normal, skewed, and bimodal continuous baseline covariates that are related to a normally distributed primary outcome. Results suggest that unadjusted CP calculations in the presence of influential covariate imbalance require careful interpretation and evaluation.
通常情况下,临床试验的有效统计分析需要对已知的有影响的协变量进行调整,无论在基线时各治疗组这些协变量是否存在不均衡。因此,有效的期中分析也必须对这些协变量进行适当调整。然而,在某些情况下,协变量调整是不可能的、未计划的,或者仅仅因为它会使推断的普遍性和直观性降低而没有什么价值。在这种情况下,治疗组之间的协变量不均衡可能会对期中分析和最终主要结局分析产生重大影响。本文阐述了有影响的连续基线协变量不均衡对未调整的条件把握度(CP)的影响,进而对基于无效性停止界值的试验决策的影响。对于与正态分布的主要结局相关的正态、偏态和双峰连续基线协变量,展示了这种关系的稳健性。结果表明,在存在有影响的协变量不均衡的情况下,未调整的CP计算需要仔细解释和评估。