• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[安乐死——从医生角度看肿瘤学治疗的限度]

[Euthanasia--limits of therapy in oncology from the physician's viewpoint].

作者信息

Ludwig H

机构信息

II. Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Wien.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1990 Oct 12;102(19):556-60.

PMID:2281668
Abstract

The Hippocratic oath, which includes refraining from the prescription of deadly drugs or giving advice on suicide still remains the cornerstone of medical ethics. Therefore, any active fostering of the dying process has to be strictly rejected. Nevertheless, in caring for cancer patients, many borderline situations arise in which serious decisions about the continuation of a treatment regimen are called for--decisions basically equating to a choice between prolonging life or allowing death. As long as the patient is able to do so, he himself must decide and the physician has to respect his decision. However, often the patient is unable to determine his own fate. No easy general recommendations can be offered for such situations. The physician has to consider the specific characteristics of the disease and take into account the patient's individual needs. Then, for each case anew, a careful, conscientious decision has to be made and the physician must take personal responsibility for its consequences. In spite of treatment successes, death cannot be conquered, but only postponed. This knowledge helps the physician to recognize more clearly the realistic possibilities of medical aid and to empathically help the dying patient.

摘要

希波克拉底誓言,其中包括禁止开致命药物或提供自杀建议,仍然是医学伦理的基石。因此,任何积极促进死亡过程的行为都必须被严格拒绝。然而,在照顾癌症患者时,会出现许多临界情况,需要就治疗方案的继续做出严肃决定——这些决定基本上等同于在延长生命和允许死亡之间做出选择。只要患者能够做到,他自己必须做出决定,医生必须尊重他的决定。然而,患者往往无法决定自己的命运。对于这种情况,无法给出简单的一般性建议。医生必须考虑疾病的具体特征,并考虑患者的个人需求。然后,针对每个病例,都必须做出谨慎、尽责的决定,医生必须对其后果承担个人责任。尽管治疗取得了成功,但死亡无法被征服,只能被推迟。这种认识有助于医生更清楚地认识到医疗援助的现实可能性,并以同理心帮助濒死患者。

相似文献

1
[Euthanasia--limits of therapy in oncology from the physician's viewpoint].[安乐死——从医生角度看肿瘤学治疗的限度]
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1990 Oct 12;102(19):556-60.
2
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
3
Decision making in the critically ill patient.危重症患者的决策制定
Prim Care. 1985 Jun;12(2):341-52.
4
[Helping to die--helping to live in the boundary between life and death].
Z Gesamte Inn Med. 1984 Nov 15;39(22):556-8.
5
[Key ethic discussions in hospice/palliative care].[临终关怀/姑息治疗中的关键伦理讨论]
Acta Med Croatica. 2008 Dec;62(5):447-54.
6
[Terminal medical interventions: psychosocial, medical, ethical and legal aspects].[终末期医疗干预:心理社会、医学、伦理及法律方面]
Rev Med Brux. 2001 Apr;22(2):93-9.
7
Nephrologists' subjective attitudes towards end-of-life issues and the conduct of terminal care.肾脏病学家对临终问题的主观态度及临终关怀的实施情况。
Clin Nephrol. 1997 Sep;48(3):173-80.
8
[Withholding and withdrawing therapy--how does the physician make a decision?].[停止和撤销治疗——医生如何做出决策?]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2009 May;44(5):380-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224785. Epub 2009 May 13.
9
Dealing with requests for euthanasia: a qualitative study investigating the experience of general practitioners.应对安乐死请求:一项调查全科医生经历的定性研究
J Med Ethics. 2008 Mar;34(3):150-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.020909.
10
The Charter for Health Care Workers: a synthesis of Hippocratic ethics and Christian morality.《医护人员宪章》:希波克拉底伦理与基督教道德的融合。
Dolentium Hominum. 1996;31(11th Yr. No. 1):48-52.