School of Health and Population Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012 Sep;27(5):533-41. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e328356dae5.
To synthesize the qualitative research literature regarding medication use to prevent cardiovascular disease in order to explain the variation in healthcare professional (HCP) and patient behaviours, and to evaluate the implications for practice.
The decision to start preventive medication is affected by the patient-HCP relationship and by the design of the service. Both HCPs and patients are influenced by their understanding of the evidence regarding the value of preventive interventions; their values and preferences; and their sociopolitical context and the organizational structure of their practice environment. The design of their service affects uptake as a consequence of its impact on clinical communication and the extent to which the service is tailored to the needs of the local community. Continuing to take prescribed medication is affected by both contextual and practical factors. Recommendations for practice can be split into those with a clinical focus and those with a patient or community focus. More sophisticated analyses have moved beyond recommendations for patient and HCP education, and address constraints in the organization of clinical services and the social context of evidence translation.
Qualitative health research provides important insights into the experience of and context for decision making about medication prescription and adherence that can help efforts to prevent cardiovascular disease.
综合有关使用药物预防心血管疾病的定性研究文献,以解释医疗保健专业人员(HCP)和患者行为的差异,并评估其对实践的影响。
开始预防性药物治疗的决定受到患者-HCP 关系和服务设计的影响。HCP 和患者都受到他们对预防干预措施价值的证据的理解、他们的价值观和偏好以及他们的社会政治背景和实践环境的组织结构的影响。服务的设计会影响到临床沟通的效果以及服务对当地社区需求的适应程度,从而影响药物的使用。继续服用规定的药物受到环境和实际因素的影响。实践建议可以分为以临床为重点和以患者或社区为重点的建议。更复杂的分析不仅仅局限于对患者和 HCP 教育的建议,还涉及到临床服务组织和证据转化的社会背景的约束。
定性健康研究提供了关于药物处方和依从性决策的经验和背景的重要见解,有助于预防心血管疾病的努力。