Blackall P J, Yamaguchi T, Iritani Y, Rogers D G
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Animal Research Institute, Yeerongpilly, Australia.
Avian Dis. 1990 Oct-Dec;34(4):861-4.
Two monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) were evaluated for their ability to serotype 108 isolates of Haemophilus paragallinarum. One MAb (E5C12D10) was raised against a Page serovar A strain and the other (F2E6) against a Page serovar C strain. In both dot blot and hemagglutination-inhibition tests, MAb E5C12D10 recognized the type strains of Page serovar A and Kume serovars A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4. MAb F2E6 recognized the type strains of Page serovar C and Kume serovars C-1, C-2, and C-3. Neither antibody recognized the type strains of Page serovar B or Kume serovars B-1 and C-4. When evaluated with 97 field isolates in a dot blot test, the MAbs serotyped 81 isolates, which was better than agglutinin typing by the Page scheme (69 isolates serotyped). The field isolates that did not react with the MAbs were either Page serovar B/Kume serovar B-1 (three isolates), Page serovar C/Kume serovar C-4 (12 isolates), or nontypable by either the Page or Kume scheme (one isolate).
评估了两种单克隆抗体(MAb)对108株副鸡嗜血杆菌进行血清分型的能力。一种单克隆抗体(E5C12D10)是针对佩奇血清型A菌株制备的,另一种(F2E6)是针对佩奇血清型C菌株制备的。在斑点印迹和血凝抑制试验中,单克隆抗体E5C12D10识别佩奇血清型A和久米血清型A-1、A-2、A-3及A-4的标准菌株。单克隆抗体F2E6识别佩奇血清型C和久米血清型C-1、C-2及C-3的标准菌株。两种抗体均未识别佩奇血清型B或久米血清型B-1和C-4的标准菌株。在斑点印迹试验中用97株现场分离株进行评估时,这些单克隆抗体对81株分离株进行了血清分型,这比采用佩奇方法进行的凝集素分型(69株分离株被分型)效果更好。未与单克隆抗体发生反应的现场分离株要么是佩奇血清型B/久米血清型B-1(3株分离株)、佩奇血清型C/久米血清型C-4(12株分离株),要么无法用佩奇或久米方法分型(1株分离株)。