• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过与英国 90 参考值相比,根据英国-世卫组织图表评估婴儿生长来评估肥胖风险:来自布拉德福德出生队列研究的发现。

The risk of obesity by assessing infant growth against the UK-WHO charts compared to the UK90 reference: findings from the Born in Bradford birth cohort study.

机构信息

Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 2nd Street S, Suite #300, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2012 Jul 23;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-104.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-12-104
PMID:22824296
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3439315/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The new growth charts in the UK, the UK-WHO charts, comprise prescriptive data from the WHO standard between two weeks and four years of age. Little is known about the development of obesity risk in normal UK infants, who are necessarily not fed according to the WHO recommendations and do not live in constraint-free environments (the selection criteria of the WHO standard source sample), using the new charts. Here, we investigated infant growth trajectories and traits indicative of childhood obesity using the UK-WHO charts, with the aim to clearly document the implications of adopting the new charts on UK growth monitoring practice.

METHODS

Mixed effects models were applied to serial weight and length data from 2181 infants (1187 White; 994 Pakistani) in the Born in Bradford birth cohort study to produce curves from 10 days to 15 months of age. Individual monthly estimates were converted to Z-scores and were plotted by sex and ethnic group. The relative risks (RR) of traits indicative of childhood obesity, including high BMI and rapid weight gain, using the UK-WHO charts compared to the previously used UK90 reference were calculated for all infants together and for White and Pakistani infants separately.

RESULTS

Both ethnic groups demonstrated patterns of growth similar to the UK-WHO charts in length but not in weight. The resulting pattern for BMI was remarkable, with an average gain of 1.0 Z-score between two and 12 months of age. The UK-WHO charts were significantly (p < 0.05) more likely than the UK90 reference to classify BMI above the 91st centile after age six months (RR 1.427-2.151) and weight and BMI gain between birth (one month for BMI) and 12 months of age greater than two centile bands (RR 1.214 and 1.470, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The change to the UK-WHO charts means that normal UK infants risk being diagnosed as being on a trajectory toward childhood obesity. National estimates of obesity will have to be recalculated for previous years to allow longitudinal comparison. The new charts do not allow a focused prevention effort for targeting programmes at infants most at risk of becoming obese, because the use of the 91st or 98th centile on the UK-WHO charts will identify many more infants as being at risk than the same centiles on the UK90 reference. Now more than ever, research is needed to develop a large scale childhood obesity prevention programme which could ideally be integrated with routine infant growth monitoring practice.

摘要

背景

英国新的生长图表,即 UK-WHO 图表,包含了世卫组织标准中从两周到四岁之间的规定性数据。对于英国正常婴儿的肥胖风险发育情况,我们知之甚少,因为这些婴儿不可能按照世卫组织的建议进行喂养,而且他们的生活环境也不是无约束的(世卫组织标准源样本的选择标准),因此无法使用新的图表。在这里,我们使用 UK-WHO 图表研究了英国婴儿的生长轨迹和肥胖特征,目的是明确记录采用新图表对英国生长监测实践的影响。

方法

混合效应模型应用于布拉德福德出生队列研究中 2181 名婴儿(1187 名白人;994 名巴基斯坦人)的连续体重和长度数据,以生成从 10 天到 15 个月的曲线。个体每月的估计值被转换为 Z 分数,并按性别和种族群体进行绘制。使用 UK-WHO 图表计算了所有婴儿以及白人和巴基斯坦婴儿的肥胖特征(包括高 BMI 和体重快速增加)的相对风险(RR),与之前使用的 UK90 参考值进行比较。

结果

两个种族群体的长度生长模式与 UK-WHO 图表相似,但体重生长模式不同。BMI 的结果非常显著,在 2 至 12 个月之间平均增加了 1.0 个 Z 分数。UK-WHO 图表在六个月后(RR 1.427-2.151)和出生至 12 个月期间体重和 BMI 增长超过两个百分位带(RR 1.214 和 1.470)时,将 BMI 分类为 91 百分位以上的可能性明显高于 UK90 参考值(RR 1.427-2.151)。

结论

改用 UK-WHO 图表意味着英国正常婴儿有被诊断为肥胖轨迹的风险。为了进行纵向比较,之前年份的肥胖国家估计值将不得不重新计算。新图表不能将重点放在预防措施上,因为针对最有可能肥胖的婴儿的计划,因为使用 UK-WHO 图表的 91 百分位或 98 百分位会比使用 UK90 参考值识别出更多处于风险中的婴儿。现在比以往任何时候都更需要研究来制定一个大规模的儿童肥胖预防计划,该计划可以理想地与常规婴儿生长监测实践相结合。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbd/3439315/e46e22242d26/1471-2431-12-104-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbd/3439315/695e2926cd91/1471-2431-12-104-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbd/3439315/487861336bfb/1471-2431-12-104-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbd/3439315/e46e22242d26/1471-2431-12-104-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbd/3439315/695e2926cd91/1471-2431-12-104-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbd/3439315/487861336bfb/1471-2431-12-104-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7bbd/3439315/e46e22242d26/1471-2431-12-104-3.jpg

相似文献

1
The risk of obesity by assessing infant growth against the UK-WHO charts compared to the UK90 reference: findings from the Born in Bradford birth cohort study.通过与英国 90 参考值相比,根据英国-世卫组织图表评估婴儿生长来评估肥胖风险:来自布拉德福德出生队列研究的发现。
BMC Pediatr. 2012 Jul 23;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-12-104.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Implications of adopting the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standard in the UK: two prospective cohort studies.在英国采用世界卫生组织2006年儿童生长标准的影响:两项前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jul;93(7):566-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.126854. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
4
Describing differences in weight and length growth trajectories between white and Pakistani infants in the UK: analysis of the Born in Bradford birth cohort study using multilevel linear spline models.描述英国白人和巴基斯坦裔婴儿体重和身长增长轨迹的差异:使用多层次线性样条模型对布拉德福德出生队列研究的分析。
Arch Dis Child. 2013 Apr;98(4):274-9. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2012-302778. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
5
A Comparison of UK Preterm Anthropometric Charts and INTERGROWTH-21st: Is It Time to Change Growth Charts?英国早产儿人体测量图表与 INTERGROWTH-21st 的比较:是时候更换生长图表了吗?
Neonatology. 2020;117(3):300-307. doi: 10.1159/000507024. Epub 2020 May 12.
6
[WHO growth standards for infants and young children].[世界卫生组织婴幼儿生长标准]
Arch Pediatr. 2009 Jan;16(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2008.10.010. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
7
Small-for-gestational age and large-for-gestational age thresholds to predict infants at risk of adverse delivery and neonatal outcomes: are current charts adequate? An observational study from the Born in Bradford cohort.预测有不良分娩和新生儿结局风险婴儿的小于胎龄和大于胎龄阈值:当前图表是否足够?来自布拉德福德出生队列的一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2015 Mar 17;5(3):e006743. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006743.
8
Growth centile charts (anthropometric measurement) of Pakistani pediatric population.巴基斯坦儿童群体的生长百分位数图表(人体测量)
J Pak Med Assoc. 2012 Apr;62(4):367-77.
9
Ethnic differences in infant feeding practices and their relationship with BMI at 3 years of age - results from the Born in Bradford birth cohort study.婴儿喂养方式的种族差异及其与 3 岁时 BMI 的关系 - 来自布拉德福德出生队列研究的结果。
Br J Nutr. 2014 May 28;111(10):1891-7. doi: 10.1017/S0007114514000099. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
10
UK-born Pakistani-origin infants are relatively more adipose than white British infants: findings from 8704 mother-offspring pairs in the Born-in-Bradford prospective birth cohort.英籍巴基斯坦裔婴儿比白种英国婴儿相对更肥胖:来自布拉德福德出生队列前瞻性出生队列的 8704 对母婴的研究结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Jul;67(7):544-51. doi: 10.1136/jech-2012-201891. Epub 2013 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of an outcome indicator framework for a universal health visiting programme using routinely collected data.开发一个基于常规数据的通用家庭访视项目的结果指标框架。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11178-7.
2
Genetically inferred birthweight, height, and puberty timing and risk of osteosarcoma.遗传推断的出生体重、身高和青春期时间与骨肉瘤风险的关系。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;92:102432. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102432. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
3
Centile reference chart for resting metabolic rate through the life course.

本文引用的文献

1
Prediction of childhood obesity by infancy weight gain: an individual-level meta-analysis.婴儿期体重增长预测儿童肥胖:个体水平的荟萃分析。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Jan;26(1):19-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2011.01213.x. Epub 2011 Aug 1.
2
Revised birth centiles for weight, length and head circumference in the UK-WHO growth charts.英国-世界卫生组织生长图表中体重、身长和头围的修订生长标准。
Ann Hum Biol. 2011 Jan;38(1):7-11. doi: 10.3109/03014460.2011.544139.
3
Socioeconomic disparities in trajectories of adiposity across childhood.
生命全程静息代谢率百分位参考图表。
Arch Dis Child. 2023 Jul;108(7):545-549. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2022-325249. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
4
Descriptive Study about Bodyweight Status of Extremadura Adolescents. Are We Applying the Best Indicator as the Reference Parameter?关于埃斯特雷马杜拉青少年体重状况的描述性研究。我们是否在使用最佳指标作为参考参数?
Biology (Basel). 2021 Jul 14;10(7):662. doi: 10.3390/biology10070662.
5
Comparative study on the early growth of preterm infants with the World Health Organization growth standards and the China growth charts.早产儿生长与世界卫生组织生长标准及中国生长曲线的比较研究。
Pediatr Int. 2021 Aug;63(8):935-943. doi: 10.1111/ped.14692. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
6
Associations between a maternal healthy lifestyle score and adverse offspring birth outcomes and childhood obesity in the Lifeways Cross-Generation Cohort Study.母亲健康生活方式评分与后代不良出生结局和儿童肥胖的关系:莱夫韦兹跨代队列研究。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2020 Nov;44(11):2213-2224. doi: 10.1038/s41366-020-00652-x. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
7
Metrics of early childhood growth in recent epidemiological research: A scoping review.近期流行病学研究中幼儿生长的度量指标:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 20;13(3):e0194565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194565. eCollection 2018.
8
Connecting the Dots in Childhood Obesity Disparities: A Review of Growth Patterns from Birth to Pre-Adolescence.梳理儿童肥胖差异中的关联:从出生到青春期前的生长模式综述
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2016 Mar 1;3(1):113-124. doi: 10.1007/s40471-016-0065-9. Epub 2016 Feb 15.
9
Analytical strategies in human growth research.人类生长研究中的分析策略。
Am J Hum Biol. 2015 Jan-Feb;27(1):69-83. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22589. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
儿童期肥胖轨迹中的社会经济差异。
Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011 Jun;6(2-2):e144-53. doi: 10.3109/17477166.2010.500387. Epub 2010 Sep 22.
4
Effects of infant feeding practice on weight gain from birth to 3 years.婴儿喂养方式对出生至3岁体重增加的影响。
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Aug;94(8):577-82. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.137554. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
5
The reliability of routine anthropometric data collected by health workers: a cross-sectional study.卫生工作者收集的常规人体测量数据的可靠性:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Mar;46(3):310-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.10.003. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
6
Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: protocol for the recruitment phase.《布拉德福德出生队列研究:关于在布拉德福德出生的婴儿及其父母的研究方案:招募阶段》
BMC Public Health. 2008 Sep 23;8:327. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-327.
7
Implications of adopting the WHO 2006 Child Growth Standard in the UK: two prospective cohort studies.在英国采用世界卫生组织2006年儿童生长标准的影响:两项前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Jul;93(7):566-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.126854. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
8
Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 growth charts.世界卫生组织儿童生长标准与美国疾病控制与预防中心2000年生长图表的比较。
J Nutr. 2007 Jan;137(1):144-8. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.1.144.
9
Comparison of the World Health Organization (WHO) Child Growth Standards and the National Center for Health Statistics/WHO international growth reference: implications for child health programmes.世界卫生组织(WHO)儿童生长标准与美国国家卫生统计中心/世界卫生组织国际生长参考标准的比较:对儿童健康项目的影响。
Public Health Nutr. 2006 Oct;9(7):942-7. doi: 10.1017/phn20062005.
10
Body mass index has risen more steeply in tall than in short 3-year olds: serial cross-sectional surveys 1988-2003.1988 - 2003年系列横断面调查显示,3岁幼儿中,高个子幼儿的体重指数上升幅度比矮个子幼儿更大。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jan;31(1):23-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803435. Epub 2006 Aug 1.