• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在学术性急诊科内设计并实施一个独立的胸痛评估中心。

Design and implementation of a stand-alone chest pain evaluation center within an academic emergency department.

作者信息

Winchester David E, Stomp Dhane, Shifrin Roger Y, Jois Preeti

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32610-0277, USA.

出版信息

Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2012 Sep;11(3):123-7. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31825d28b9.

DOI:10.1097/HPC.0b013e31825d28b9
PMID:22825532
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3404430/
Abstract

Chest pain is a common presenting symptom for emergency department (ED) patients; however, a thorough cardiac evaluation can be difficult to complete within the ED setting. Implementation of a stand-alone unit for the evaluation of chest pain may improve care for patients with chest pain. We designed a protocol for identifying patients without an acute coronary syndrome and with low-to-intermediate likelihood of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). These patients were monitored in a stand-alone chest pain evaluation center (CPEC) staffed with a small group of providers and tested for CAD, if necessary. In the first 6 weeks of operation, 181 patients were evaluated in the CPEC. The prevalence of CAD risk factors was low. Of the 181 patients, 159 (88%) were discharged home and 22 (12%) required admission to the hospital for further care. We compared the number of chest pain evaluations and admissions for first 6 weeks of operation to the same 6-week period from the 2 previous years. Whereas ED chest pain evaluations increased 66% over the 2-year time frame, the proportion admitted to the hospital decreased from 53% to 42% (P < 0.0001). In conclusion, evidence-based evaluation of chest pain in patients without acute coronary syndrome and with low-to-intermediate likelihood of obstructive CAD can result in the significant majority of patients being discharged from the ED. Creation of a stand-alone CPEC in an academic hospital was associated with a significant reduction in hospital admissions.

摘要

胸痛是急诊科患者常见的就诊症状;然而,在急诊科环境中很难完成全面的心脏评估。设立一个独立的胸痛评估单元可能会改善胸痛患者的护理。我们设计了一个方案,用于识别无急性冠状动脉综合征且患阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)可能性为低到中度的患者。这些患者在由一小批医护人员组成的独立胸痛评估中心(CPEC)接受监测,并在必要时接受CAD检测。在运营的前6周,有181名患者在CPEC接受了评估。CAD危险因素的患病率较低。在这181名患者中,159名(88%)被送回家,22名(12%)需要住院接受进一步治疗。我们将运营前6周的胸痛评估次数和住院人数与前两年相同的6周时间段进行了比较。在两年时间内,急诊科的胸痛评估次数增加了66%,而住院比例从53%降至42%(P<0.0001)。总之,对无急性冠状动脉综合征且患阻塞性CAD可能性为低到中度的患者进行基于证据的胸痛评估,可使绝大多数患者从急诊科出院。在一家学术医院设立独立的CPEC与住院人数显著减少相关。

相似文献

1
Design and implementation of a stand-alone chest pain evaluation center within an academic emergency department.在学术性急诊科内设计并实施一个独立的胸痛评估中心。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2012 Sep;11(3):123-7. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e31825d28b9.
2
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
3
Associations between routine coronary computed tomographic angiography and reduced unnecessary hospital admissions, length of stay, recidivism rates, and invasive coronary angiography in the emergency department triage of chest pain.常规冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影术与减少急诊科胸痛分诊时不必要的住院人数、住院时间、再入院率和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的相关性。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 6;62(6):543-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.040. Epub 2013 May 15.
4
Documentation of HEART score discordance between emergency physician and cardiologist evaluations of ED patients with chest pain.急诊科(ED)胸痛患者经急诊医生和心脏病专家评估后,HEART评分不一致情况的记录。
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;35(1):132-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.09.058. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Novel Emergency Department Risk Score Discriminates Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Chest Pain Patients With Known Coronary Artery Disease.新型急诊科风险评分可鉴别已知冠状动脉疾病的胸痛患者中的急性冠状动脉综合征。
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Dec;15(4):138-144. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000091.
6
Cardiac risk factors and risk scores vs cardiac computed tomography angiography: a prospective cohort study for triage of ED patients with acute chest pain.心脏危险因素和风险评分与心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影术:一项用于 ED 急性胸痛患者分诊的前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;31(10):1479-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
7
Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department (GRACE): Recurrent, low-risk chest pain in the emergency department.急诊科合理与适宜医疗指南(GRACE):急诊科反复出现的低危胸痛。
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Jul;28(7):718-744. doi: 10.1111/acem.14296. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
8
Noninvasive Cardiac Testing vs Clinical Evaluation Alone in Acute Chest Pain: A Secondary Analysis of the ROMICAT-II Randomized Clinical Trial.无创性心脏检测与单纯临床评估在急性胸痛中的对比:ROMICAT-II 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Feb 1;178(2):212-219. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.7360.
9
Efficacy of multi-detector coronary computed tomography angiography in comparison with exercise electrocardiogram in the triage of patients of low risk acute chest pain.多排冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影术与运动心电图在低风险急性胸痛患者分诊中的疗效比较
Indian Heart J. 2014 Jul-Aug;66(4):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2014.05.026. Epub 2014 Jul 3.
10
Impact of coronary risk scores on disposition decision in emergency patients with chest pain.冠心病风险评分对胸痛急诊患者处置决策的影响。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:165-169. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.029. Epub 2021 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimates of radiation exposure and subsequent risk of malignancy due to cardiac imaging in the emergency department for evaluation of chest pain: a cohort study.急诊科因胸痛评估进行心脏成像后的辐射暴露估计及后续恶性肿瘤风险:一项队列研究。
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 Dec;30(8):626-628. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000806.
2
Utility of the Diamond-Forrester Classification in Stratifying Acute Chest Pain in an Academic Chest Pain Center.钻石-弗雷斯特分类法在学术性胸痛中心对急性胸痛进行分层中的应用
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016 Jun;15(2):56-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000071.
3
Prevalence and Overlap of Noncardiac Conditions in the Evaluation of Low-risk Acute Chest Pain Patients.

本文引用的文献

1
CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.CT 血管造影术可安全出院疑似急性冠脉综合征患者。
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1201163. Epub 2012 Mar 26.
2
Health literacy and outcomes among patients with heart failure.心力衰竭患者的健康素养与预后
JAMA. 2011 Apr 27;305(16):1695-701. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.512.
3
Immediate computed tomography coronary angiography versus delayed outpatient stress testing for detecting coronary artery disease in emergency department patients with chest pain.
低风险急性胸痛患者评估中非心脏疾病的患病率及重叠情况
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2015 Sep;14(3):97-102. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000050.
4
Diagnostic yield of routine noninvasive cardiovascular testing in low-risk acute chest pain patients.低风险急性胸痛患者常规非侵入性心血管检查的诊断率
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Jul 15;116(2):204-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.058. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
5
Prevalence and implications of severe anxiety in a prospective cohort of acute chest pain patients.急性胸痛患者前瞻性队列中重度焦虑的患病率及其影响
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2015 Mar;14(1):44-7. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000038.
即刻计算机断层扫描冠状动脉造影与延迟门诊应激试验在急诊科胸痛患者中检测冠状动脉疾病的比较。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Mar;28(3):667-74. doi: 10.1007/s10554-011-9870-x. Epub 2011 Apr 19.
4
ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 心脏计算机断层扫描适用标准。美国心脏病学会基金会适用标准特别工作组、心血管计算机断层扫描学会、美国放射学会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核医学学会、北美心血管成像学会、心血管血管造影和介入学会以及心血管磁共振学会的报告。
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2010 Nov-Dec;4(6):407.e1-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2010.11.001. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
5
Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.低危胸痛患者就诊于急诊科的检测:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2010 Oct 26;122(17):1756-76. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181ec61df. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
6
Recommendations for clinical exercise laboratories: a scientific statement from the american heart association.临床运动实验室的建议:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2009 Jun 23;119(24):3144-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192520. Epub 2009 Jun 1.
7
Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial.冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影用于急性胸痛患者的早期分诊:ROMICAT(使用计算机辅助断层扫描排除心肌梗死)试验
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 May 5;53(18):1642-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.01.052.
8
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.研究电子数据采集(REDCap)——一种用于提供转化研究信息学支持的元数据驱动方法和工作流程。
J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
9
Usefulness of 64-slice cardiac computed tomographic angiography for diagnosing acute coronary syndromes and predicting clinical outcome in emergency department patients with chest pain of uncertain origin.64层心脏计算机断层血管造影术在急诊科胸痛原因不明患者中诊断急性冠脉综合征及预测临床结局的应用价值。
Circulation. 2007 Apr 3;115(13):1762-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.618389. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
10
A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain.一项关于多层螺旋冠状动脉计算机断层扫描评估急性胸痛的随机对照试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Feb 27;49(8):863-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.064. Epub 2007 Feb 12.