• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨专业教育模块的引入:学生的看法

The introduction of an interprofessional education module: students' perceptions.

作者信息

Cusack Tara, O'Donoghue Grainne

机构信息

UCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Population Science, Health Sciences Centre, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(3):231-8.

PMID:22828679
Abstract

AIM

The purpose of this study was to examine health science students' perceptions of an interprofessional education (IPE) module delivered by means of problem-based learning (PBL).

METHODS

Ninety-two students from four health science disciplines (medicine, physiotherapy, nursing and diagnostic imaging) elected to participate in this IPE PBL module. An evaluation was undertaken using a questionnaire with quantitative and qualitative components completed at the end of the module. Students were asked to evaluate aspects of the module relating to learning objectives, intellectual stimulation, resources, library information skills, work load and overall satisfaction. Open-ended questions asked students to comment on the best aspects of the module and areas for improvement. Quantitative data were analysed using SPSS version 18 and qualitative data using framework analysis methodology.

RESULTS

Of the 92 students that participated in the module, 70 (78%) completed the questionnaire. Over 70% (n = 49) of students positively endorsed the module in terms of the statements posed. Overall satisfaction with the module was high, with 63 (91%) students reporting that they agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with the module. Analysis of qualitative data revealed the following emerging themes in relation to the module: (1) collaboration (learning together with others from different professions); (2) structure (small group work, discussion, teamwork assessment procedures); and (3) content (problem diversity).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of this IPE module for health science students was well received. Students valued the opportunity to work in small groups with individuals from other health science disciplines. Students highlighted module structure and content as being important elements for consideration when developing IPE. Further research is required in order to define whether improving communication and collaboration skills will ultimately lead to improved quality in patient care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在考察健康科学专业学生对通过基于问题的学习(PBL)方式开展的跨专业教育(IPE)模块的看法。

方法

来自四个健康科学学科(医学、物理治疗、护理和诊断成像)的92名学生选择参加这个IPE PBL模块。在该模块结束时,使用一份包含定量和定性部分的问卷进行了评估。学生们被要求对该模块与学习目标、智力激发、资源、图书馆信息技能、工作量和总体满意度相关的方面进行评价。开放式问题要求学生对该模块的最佳方面和改进领域发表评论。定量数据使用SPSS 18版进行分析,定性数据使用框架分析方法进行分析。

结果

在参加该模块的92名学生中,70名(78%)完成了问卷。超过70%(n = 49)的学生对问卷中提出的陈述给予了积极认可。对该模块的总体满意度较高,63名(91%)学生表示同意或强烈同意他们对该模块感到满意。定性数据分析揭示了与该模块相关的以下新出现的主题:(1)协作(与来自不同专业的其他人一起学习);(2)结构(小组工作、讨论、团队合作评估程序);以及(3)内容(问题多样性)。

结论

为健康科学专业学生引入的这个IPE模块受到了好评。学生们重视与来自其他健康科学学科的人一起进行小组合作的机会。学生们强调模块结构和内容是开展IPE时需要考虑的重要因素。需要进一步研究以确定提高沟通和协作技能是否最终会提高患者护理质量。

相似文献

1
The introduction of an interprofessional education module: students' perceptions.跨专业教育模块的引入:学生的看法
Qual Prim Care. 2012;20(3):231-8.
2
Dietetics students' perceptions and experiences of interprofessional education.营养学专业学生对跨专业教育的看法和体验。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011 Apr;24(2):135-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2010.01141.x. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
3
Interprofessional education in undergraduate healthcare programmes: the reaction of student dietitians.本科医疗保健课程中的跨专业教育:学生营养师的反应。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2005 Dec;18(6):461-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2005.00650.x.
4
An introduction to teamwork: findings from an evaluation of an interprofessional education experience for 1000 first-year health science students.团队合作简介:对1000名健康科学专业一年级学生的跨专业教育经历评估结果
J Allied Health. 2009 Winter;38(4):220-6.
5
Stereotyping as a barrier to collaboration: Does interprofessional education make a difference?刻板印象是合作的障碍:跨专业教育是否有影响?
Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Feb;31(2):208-13. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jul 23.
6
Development, implementation, and short-term effectiveness of an interprofessional education course in a school of health professions.健康职业学院跨专业教育课程的开发、实施与短期成效
J Allied Health. 2012 Spring;41(1):14-20.
7
Preparing for the dental team: investigating the views of dental and dental care professional students.为牙科团队做准备:调查牙科及牙科护理专业学生的看法。
Eur J Dent Educ. 2008 Feb;12(1):23-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00487.x.
8
Interprofessional education in practice.实践中的跨专业教育。
Clin Teach. 2012 Feb;9(1):27-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00486.x.
9
Undergraduate students' perceptions of and attitudes toward a simulation-based interprofessional curriculum: the KidSIM ATTITUDES questionnaire.本科学生对基于模拟的跨专业课程的看法和态度:KidSIM 态度问卷。
Simul Healthc. 2012 Dec;7(6):353-8. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318264499e.
10
Interprofessional team-based learning (TBL): how do students engage?跨专业团队学习(TBL):学生如何参与?
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Apr 19;20(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02024-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-clinician involvement in interprofessional health sciences education: educator experiences and attitudes.非临床医生参与跨专业健康科学教育:教育工作者的经验与态度
J Med Libr Assoc. 2025 Apr 18;113(2):133-142. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2025.1763.
2
A scoping review of interprofessional education in healthcare: evaluating competency development, educational outcomes and challenges.医疗保健领域跨专业教育的范围综述:评估能力发展、教育成果和挑战。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):409. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06969-3.
3
Development of interprofessional educational module for understanding the musculoskeletal basis of sports injury.
开发用于理解运动损伤肌肉骨骼基础的跨专业教育模块。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2024 Oct;13(10):4598-4604. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_478_24. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Interprofessional communication skills training to improve medical students' and nursing trainees' error communication - quasi-experimental pilot study.跨专业沟通技巧培训以提高医学生和护理实习生的差错沟通能力-准实验性试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 3;24(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04997-5.
5
Students' readiness for and perception of Interprofessional learning: a cross-sectional study.学生对跨专业学习的准备情况和认知:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Oct 29;20(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02325-9.
6
The effect of problem-solving-based interprofessional learning on critical thinking and satisfaction with learning of nursing and midwifery students.基于问题解决的跨专业学习对护理和助产专业学生批判性思维及学习满意度的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 May 28;9:109. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_640_19. eCollection 2020.
7
Inter-Professionalism in Health Care Post-graduate specialization: an innovative Laboratory.医疗保健研究生专业化中的跨专业协作:一个创新实验室。
Acta Biomed. 2019 Mar 28;90(4-S):8-16. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i4-S.8306.
8
Assessment of knowledge and skills in information literacy instruction for rehabilitation sciences students: a scoping review.康复科学专业学生信息素养教学的知识与技能评估:一项范围综述
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):15-37. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.227. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
9
Teaching evidence-based practice principles to prepare health professions students for an interprofessional learning experience.教授循证实践原则,让健康专业学生为跨专业学习经历做好准备。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2017 Oct;105(4):376-384. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2017.179. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
10
Standing on the Precipice: Evaluating Final-Year Physiotherapy Students' Perspectives of Their Curriculum as Preparation for Primary Health Care Practice.站在悬崖边缘:评估最后一年物理治疗专业学生对其课程作为初级卫生保健实践准备的看法。
Physiother Can. 2016;68(2):188-196. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2015-11E.