• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

独立研究使用深度测序解决了同样的一组核心细菌物种,这些物种主导着蜜蜂肠道群落。

Independent studies using deep sequencing resolve the same set of core bacterial species dominating gut communities of honey bees.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041250. Epub 2012 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0041250
PMID:22829932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3400611/
Abstract

Starting in 2003, numerous studies using culture-independent methodologies to characterize the gut microbiota of honey bees have retrieved a consistent and distinctive set of eight bacterial species, based on near identity of the 16S rRNA gene sequences. A recent study [Mattila HR, Rios D, Walker-Sperling VE, Roeselers G, Newton ILG (2012) Characterization of the active microbiotas associated with honey bees reveals healthier and broader communities when colonies are genetically diverse. PLoS ONE 7(3): e32962], using pyrosequencing of the V1-V2 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene, reported finding entirely novel bacterial species in honey bee guts, and used taxonomic assignments from these reads to predict metabolic activities based on known metabolisms of cultivable species. To better understand this discrepancy, we analyzed the Mattila et al. pyrotag dataset. In contrast to the conclusions of Mattila et al., we found that the large majority of pyrotag sequences belonged to clusters for which representative sequences were identical to sequences from previously identified core species of the bee microbiota. On average, they represent 95% of the bacteria in each worker bee in the Mattila et al. dataset, a slightly lower value than that found in other studies. Some colonies contain small proportions of other bacteria, mostly species of Enterobacteriaceae. Reanalysis of the Mattila et al. dataset also did not support a relationship between abundances of Bifidobacterium and of putative pathogens or a significant difference in gut communities between colonies from queens that were singly or multiply mated. Additionally, consistent with previous studies, the dataset supports the occurrence of considerable strain variation within core species, even within single colonies. The roles of these bacteria within bees, or the implications of the strain variation, are not yet clear.

摘要

自 2003 年以来,使用非培养方法研究蜜蜂肠道微生物群的大量研究基于 16S rRNA 基因序列的近同源性,均检索到一致且独特的八细菌种。最近的一项研究[Mattila HR、Rios D、Walker-Sperling VE、Roeselers G、Newton ILG(2012 年)]使用 16S rRNA 基因 V1-V2 高变区的焦磷酸测序,报告发现了蜜蜂肠道中完全新颖的细菌物种,并使用这些读取的分类分配来预测基于可培养物种的已知代谢的代谢活性。为了更好地理解这种差异,我们分析了 Mattila 等人的 pyrotag 数据集。与 Mattila 等人的结论相反,我们发现绝大多数 pyrotag 序列属于与先前鉴定的蜜蜂微生物群核心物种的代表序列完全相同的聚类。平均而言,它们代表了 Mattila 等人数据集每个工蜂中 95%的细菌,略低于其他研究中发现的值。一些蜂群含有少量其他细菌,主要是肠杆菌科的物种。对 Mattila 等人数据集的重新分析也不支持双歧杆菌丰度与假定病原体之间存在关系,或者单配或多配蜂王的蜂群之间肠道群落存在显著差异。此外,与先前的研究一致,该数据集支持核心物种内发生相当大的菌株变异,即使在单个蜂群内也是如此。这些细菌在蜜蜂中的作用或菌株变异的影响尚不清楚。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f47/3400611/a9f91667967e/pone.0041250.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f47/3400611/68743d7cb3c9/pone.0041250.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f47/3400611/8d4500eed1a0/pone.0041250.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f47/3400611/a9f91667967e/pone.0041250.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f47/3400611/68743d7cb3c9/pone.0041250.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f47/3400611/8d4500eed1a0/pone.0041250.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f47/3400611/a9f91667967e/pone.0041250.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Independent studies using deep sequencing resolve the same set of core bacterial species dominating gut communities of honey bees.独立研究使用深度测序解决了同样的一组核心细菌物种,这些物种主导着蜜蜂肠道群落。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041250. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
2
Characterization of the active microbiotas associated with honey bees reveals healthier and broader communities when colonies are genetically diverse.对与蜜蜂相关的活跃微生物组的特征分析表明,当蜂群具有遗传多样性时,其微生物组更健康且更广泛。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032962. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
3
Pyrosequencing analysis of the bacterial communities in the guts of honey bees Apis cerana and Apis mellifera in Korea.韩国中华蜜蜂和意大利蜜蜂肠道细菌群落的焦磷酸测序分析。
J Microbiol. 2012 Oct;50(5):735-45. doi: 10.1007/s12275-012-2188-0. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
4
The bacterial communities associated with honey bee (Apis mellifera) foragers.与蜜蜂蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)觅食者相关的细菌群落。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 16;9(4):e95056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095056. eCollection 2014.
5
Gut and Whole-Body Microbiota of the Honey Bee Separate Thriving and Non-thriving Hives.蜜蜂的肠道和全身微生物群可区分健康蜂群和非健康蜂群。
Microb Ecol. 2019 Jul;78(1):195-205. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1287-9. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
6
The queen's gut refines with age: longevity phenotypes in a social insect model.女王的肠道随年龄而精细化:社会昆虫模型中的长寿表型。
Microbiome. 2018 Jun 18;6(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0489-1.
7
Variation in gut microbial communities and its association with pathogen infection in wild bumble bees (Bombus).野生熊蜂(Bombus)肠道微生物群落的变化及其与病原体感染的关系。
ISME J. 2014 Dec;8(12):2369-79. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.68. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
8
Deep Divergence and Genomic Diversification of Gut Symbionts of Neotropical Stingless Bees.肠共生菌的深度分歧与基因多样化:新热带无刺蜂研究
mBio. 2023 Apr 25;14(2):e0353822. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03538-22. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
9
Longitudinal Effects of Supplemental Forage on the Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Microbiota and Inter- and Intra-Colony Variability.补充饲料对蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)微生物群及其种内和种间变异性的纵向影响。
Microb Ecol. 2018 Oct;76(3):814-824. doi: 10.1007/s00248-018-1151-y. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
10
Distinctive gut microbiota of honey bees assessed using deep sampling from individual worker bees.利用个体工蜂的深度采样来评估蜜蜂独特的肠道微生物群。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036393. Epub 2012 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of Diet and Foraged Pollen Interactions with the Honeybee Gut Microbiome.饮食与采集花粉与蜜蜂肠道微生物群相互作用的综述
Microb Ecol. 2025 May 27;88(1):54. doi: 10.1007/s00248-025-02551-y.
2
Lactic acid bacteria in Swedish honey bees during outbreaks of American foulbrood.美国幼虫腐臭病爆发期间瑞典蜜蜂体内的乳酸菌
Ecol Evol. 2024 Feb 13;14(2):e10964. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10964. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Comparing the impact of landscape on the gut microbiome of Apis mellifera in Atlantic Forest and Caatinga Biomes.比较大西洋森林和卡廷加生物群落中景观对蜜蜂肠道微生物群的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Functional diversity within the simple gut microbiota of the honey bee.蜜蜂简单肠道微生物群中的功能多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jul 3;109(27):11002-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202970109. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
2
Distinctive gut microbiota of honey bees assessed using deep sampling from individual worker bees.利用个体工蜂的深度采样来评估蜜蜂独特的肠道微生物群。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e36393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036393. Epub 2012 Apr 27.
3
Characterization of the active microbiotas associated with honey bees reveals healthier and broader communities when colonies are genetically diverse.
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):5293. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-85114-y.
4
Early-Life Sublethal Exposure to Thiacloprid Alters Adult Honeybee Gut Microbiota.早期亚致死接触噻虫啉会改变成年蜜蜂的肠道微生物群。
Genes (Basel). 2024 Jul 31;15(8):1001. doi: 10.3390/genes15081001.
5
Quantitative microbiome profiling of honey bee (Apis mellifera) guts is predictive of winter colony loss in northern Virginia (USA).对蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)肠道的定量微生物组分析可预测美国弗吉尼亚州北部冬季蜂群的损失。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 14;14(1):11021. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61199-9.
6
gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of a novel genus of the family , isolated from the gut of the western honey bee .新属,新种,属于该科一个新属的成员,从西方蜜蜂肠道中分离得到。
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024 Apr;74(4). doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.006346.
7
Melipona stingless bees and honey microbiota reveal the diversity, composition, and modes of symbionts transmission.无刺蜜蜂及其蜂蜜微生物群揭示了共生体的多样性、组成和传播方式。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024 Jun 17;100(7). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiae063.
8
A longitudinal field study of commercial honey bees shows that non-native probiotics do not rescue antibiotic treatment, and are generally not beneficial.一项针对商业蜜蜂的纵向实地研究表明,非本地益生菌并不能挽救抗生素治疗,而且通常没有好处。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jan 23;14(1):1954. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52118-z.
9
Fungicides and insecticides can alter the microbial community on the cuticle of honey bees.杀真菌剂和杀虫剂会改变蜜蜂表皮上的微生物群落。
Front Microbiol. 2023 Oct 30;14:1271498. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1271498. eCollection 2023.
10
Gut microbiota variation of a tropical oil-collecting bee species far exceeds that of the honeybee.一种热带采油蜂的肠道微生物群变化远远超过蜜蜂。
Front Microbiol. 2023 May 17;14:1122489. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1122489. eCollection 2023.
对与蜜蜂相关的活跃微生物组的特征分析表明,当蜂群具有遗传多样性时,其微生物组更健康且更广泛。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032962. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
4
Establishment of characteristic gut bacteria during development of the honeybee worker.在工蜂发育过程中建立特征性肠道细菌。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Apr;78(8):2830-40. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07810-11. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
5
T-RFLP analysis of bacterial communities in the midguts of Apis mellifera and Apis cerana honey bees in Thailand.泰国地区蜜蜂中肠细菌群落的 T-RFLP 分析。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Feb;79(2):273-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01216.x. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
6
Bacterial communities of diverse Drosophila species: ecological context of a host-microbe model system.不同果蝇物种的细菌群落:宿主-微生物模型系统的生态背景。
PLoS Genet. 2011 Sep;7(9):e1002272. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002272. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
7
Disruption of the termite gut microbiota and its prolonged consequences for fitness.破坏白蚁肠道微生物群及其对适应力的长期影响。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jul;77(13):4303-12. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01886-10. Epub 2011 May 13.
8
Bacterial communities in central European bumblebees: low diversity and high specificity.中欧熊蜂体内的细菌群落:多样性低,特异性高。
Microb Ecol. 2011 Jul;62(1):121-33. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9854-3. Epub 2011 May 10.
9
A simple and distinctive microbiota associated with honey bees and bumble bees.与蜜蜂和熊蜂相关的简单而独特的微生物组。
Mol Ecol. 2011 Feb;20(3):619-28. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04959.x. Epub 2010 Dec 22.
10
Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.比 BLAST 快几个数量级的搜索和聚类。
Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461. Epub 2010 Aug 12.