Université Paris Descartes, Laboratoire de psychologie et neuropsychologie cognitives, Boulogne Billancourt, France.
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Oct;53(5):382-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00963.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
With the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, the repetition effect on false memory had never been clarified. More importantly, the spacing effect on false memory was never directly investigated. So, we carried out two experiments to examine these effects on true and false recognition. In experiment 1, participants studied DRM lists which were presented one, three or five times. In experiment 2, we manipulated the repetition mode (massed vs. spaced with a short interval or a long interval) to explore the spacing effect. The results showed that true recognition increased monotonically with list repetition (experiment 1) and repetition spacing (experiment 2). The most striking finding was a similar spacing effect but no repetition effect on false recognition. Thus, these results were principally discussed in the light of the activation-monitoring framework.
使用 Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) 范式，虚假记忆的重复效应从未得到明确阐明。更重要的是，虚假记忆的间隔效应从未被直接研究过。因此，我们进行了两项实验来检验这些对真实和虚假识别的影响。在实验 1 中，参与者学习了呈现一次、三次或五次的 DRM 列表。在实验 2 中，我们操纵了重复模式（集中重复与间隔重复，间隔时间短或长）来探索间隔效应。结果表明，真实识别随着列表重复（实验 1）和重复间隔（实验 2）单调增加。最引人注目的发现是虚假识别存在类似的间隔效应，但没有重复效应。因此，这些结果主要根据激活监测框架进行了讨论。
