• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨语言条件下的错误记忆:关于不同语言编码与提取效应的简要综述

False memory in between-language conditions: a brief review on the effect of encoding and retrieving in different languages.

作者信息

Beato Maria Soledad, Suarez Mar, Cadavid Sara, Albuquerque Pedro B

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.

School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1237471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237471. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237471
PMID:37637899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10448188/
Abstract

False memories have been extensively investigated over the past few decades using the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. In this paradigm, participants study lists of words associatively related to a non-presented critical lure. During a memory test, these critical lures are falsely recalled or recognized. Most studies have focused on false memories that arise when both encoding and retrieval are conducted in the same language (i.e., within-language conditions), which is typically the participant's native or first language (L1). However, much less is known about false memories when critical lures appear in the memory test in a different language than the studied lists (i.e., between-language conditions), being one of them the participant's second language (L2). The main objective of this exhaustive review was to provide an overview of the current state of research on false recognition using the DRM paradigm in between-language conditions, where languages are switched between encoding and retrieval (i.e., L1L2 versus L2L1). The results revealed a language dominance effect in between-language false memories. In other words, false recognition rates were dependent on the study language, with a trend toward higher false recognition when words were enconded in the L1 (L1L2) compared to when words were encoded in the L2 (L2L1). This review enhances our understanding of how studying words in a first or second language affects false memory in the DRM paradigm, emphasizing the significance of investigating false memory in second language speakers and the necessity for further research in the field.

摘要

在过去几十年中,人们使用迪ese/罗迪格 - 麦克德莫特(DRM)范式对错误记忆进行了广泛研究。在这种范式中,参与者学习与未呈现的关键诱饵具有联想关系的单词列表。在记忆测试中,这些关键诱饵会被错误地回忆或识别出来。大多数研究都集中在编码和检索都用同一种语言进行时(即语言内条件)产生的错误记忆上,这种语言通常是参与者的母语或第一语言(L1)。然而,对于关键诱饵在记忆测试中以与学习列表不同的语言出现时(即语言间条件)的错误记忆,我们了解得要少得多,其中一种语言是参与者的第二语言(L2)。这一详尽综述的主要目的是概述在语言间条件下使用DRM范式进行错误识别研究的当前状态,即在编码和检索之间切换语言(即L1L2与L2L1)。结果揭示了语言间错误记忆中的语言优势效应。换句话说,错误识别率取决于学习语言,与单词用L2编码(L2L1)时相比,单词用L1编码(L1L2)时错误识别率有更高的趋势。这一综述增进了我们对用第一语言或第二语言学习单词如何影响DRM范式中的错误记忆的理解,强调了研究第二语言使用者错误记忆的重要性以及该领域进一步研究的必要性。

相似文献

1
False memory in between-language conditions: a brief review on the effect of encoding and retrieving in different languages.跨语言条件下的错误记忆:关于不同语言编码与提取效应的简要综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Aug 10;14:1237471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1237471. eCollection 2023.
2
The Trajectory of Targets and Critical Lures in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm: A Systematic Review.迪斯/罗迪格-麦克德莫特范式中目标与关键诱饵的轨迹:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:718818. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718818. eCollection 2021.
3
The Role of Language Proficiency in False Memory: A Mini Review.语言能力在错误记忆中的作用:一篇小型综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 9;12:659434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659434. eCollection 2021.
4
Reduced false memory in the second language of Turkish-English bilinguals.土耳其语-英语双语者第二语言中错误记忆的减少。
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2024 Apr 3:1-9. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2024.2334345.
5
Normative data for Italian Deese/Roediger-McDermott lists.意大利版迪斯/罗迪格-麦克德莫特列表的常模数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):381-9. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0582-3.
6
Reducing False Recognition in the Deese-Roediger/McDermott Paradigm: Related Lures Reveal How Distinctive Encoding Improves Encoding and Monitoring Processes.减少Deese-Roediger/McDermott范式中的错误识别:相关诱饵揭示了独特编码如何改善编码和监测过程。
Front Psychol. 2020 Nov 20;11:602347. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602347. eCollection 2020.
7
Feelings of Contrast at Test Reduce False Memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm.测试中的对比感受可减少Deese/Roediger-McDermott范式中的错误记忆。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;12:686390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390. eCollection 2021.
8
A registered report testing the effect of sleep on Deese-Roediger-McDermott false memory: greater lure and veridical recall but fewer intrusions after sleep.一项注册报告,测试睡眠对迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特错误记忆的影响:睡眠后诱骗性记忆和真实记忆增强,但侵入性记忆减少。
R Soc Open Sci. 2023 Dec 6;10(12):220595. doi: 10.1098/rsos.220595. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
The Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) Task: A Simple Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate False Memories in the Laboratory.迪斯-罗迪格-麦克德莫特(DRM)任务:一种在实验室中研究错误记忆的简单认知范式。
J Vis Exp. 2017 Jan 31(119):54793. doi: 10.3791/54793.
10
False memory in a second language: The importance of controlling the knowledge of word meaning.第二语言中的虚假记忆:控制词汇意义知识的重要性。
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0285747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285747. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
False memory in a second language: The importance of controlling the knowledge of word meaning.第二语言中的虚假记忆:控制词汇意义知识的重要性。
PLoS One. 2023 May 11;18(5):e0285747. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285747. eCollection 2023.
2
Disentangling the Effects of Backward/Forward Associative Strength and Theme Identifiability in False Memory.在虚假记忆中区分反向/正向联想强度和主题可识别性的影响。
Psicothema. 2023 May;35(2):178-188. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2022.288.
3
Feelings of Contrast at Test Reduce False Memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott Paradigm.测试中的对比感受可减少Deese/Roediger-McDermott范式中的错误记忆。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;12:686390. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.686390. eCollection 2021.
4
The Role of Language Proficiency in False Memory: A Mini Review.语言能力在错误记忆中的作用:一篇小型综述。
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 9;12:659434. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.659434. eCollection 2021.
5
On Language and Thought: Bilingual Experience Influences Semantic Associations.论语言与思维:双语体验影响语义联想。
J Neurolinguistics. 2020 Nov;56. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2020.100932. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
6
The role of semantic processing in reading Japanese orthographies: an investigation using a script-switch paradigm.语义加工在日语正字法阅读中的作用:一项使用文字转换范式的研究。
Read Writ. 2018;31(3):503-531. doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9796-3. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
7
What Drives False Memories in Psychopathology? A Case for Associative Activation.精神病理学中是什么驱动了错误记忆?关联激活的一个例证。
Clin Psychol Sci. 2017 Nov;5(6):1048-1069. doi: 10.1177/2167702617724424. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
Both associative activation and thematic extraction count, but thematic false memories are more easily rejected.联想激活和主题提取都起作用,但主题性错误记忆更容易被摒弃。
Memory. 2014;22(8):1024-40. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2013.864680. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
9
Repetition and spacing effects on true and false recognition in the DRM paradigm.DRM 范式中真实和错误识别的重复和间隔效应。
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Oct;53(5):382-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00963.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
10
The Revised Hierarchical Model: A critical review and assessment.修订后的层次模型:批判性综述与评估
Biling (Camb Engl). 2010 Jul 1;13(3):373-381. doi: 10.1017/S136672891000009X.