Falls and Balance Research Group, Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2013 Jan;25(1):148-56. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212001184. Epub 2012 Jul 26.
Cognitively impaired older people fall twice as often as their cognitively intact counterparts. There is, however, limited information on factors that increase the risk of falls in this population. This study aimed to determine whether a group of cognitively impaired older people (CIG) perform worse than a matched group of cognitively intact older people (NCIG) on a profile of physical performance and mobility tests.
One hundred and thirty-eight cognitively impaired and 276 age and gender matched cognitively intact community-dwelling older adults (>60 years) took part in the study. Participants completed a detailed physical performance battery from which composite fall risk scores were derived. Falls were measured prospectively for 12 months with monthly falls diaries, telephone calls, and by regularly contacting participants' "person responsible."
The CIG performed worse than the NCIG in tests of reaction time, muscle strength (grip and quadriceps), balance (sway on floor, sway on foam, controlled leaning balance and near tandem standing ability), and mobility (sit to stand, timed up and go (TUG) and steps required to turn 180 degrees). The CIG had significantly higher composite fall risk scores than the NCIG and fell significantly more during follow-up (Multiple falls (2+): CIG 43%; NCIG 21%).
Fall risk in the CIG was significantly increased due to multiple physical impairments. Physical profiles provide a means of quantifying the extent of impairment in older people with cognitive impairment and potential direction for targeting interventions for reducing fall risk.
认知障碍的老年人跌倒的频率是认知正常老年人的两倍。然而,关于增加该人群跌倒风险的因素的信息有限。本研究旨在确定一组认知障碍的老年人(CIG)是否在身体表现和移动测试的特征上表现不如认知正常的老年人(NCIG)。
138 名认知障碍者和 276 名年龄和性别匹配的认知正常的社区居住的老年人(>60 岁)参与了这项研究。参与者完成了详细的身体表现测试,从中得出综合跌倒风险评分。通过每月的跌倒日记、电话以及定期联系参与者的“责任人”,前瞻性地监测了 12 个月的跌倒情况。
CIG 在反应时间、肌肉力量(握力和四头肌)、平衡(地板上的摆动、泡沫上的摆动、控制倾斜平衡和近串联站立能力)和移动性(坐立、起立和行走时间(TUG)以及转身 180 度所需的步数)方面的表现均不如 NCIG。CIG 的综合跌倒风险评分明显高于 NCIG,并且在随访期间跌倒次数明显更多(多次跌倒(2+):CIG 43%;NCIG 21%)。
由于多种身体损伤,CIG 的跌倒风险显著增加。身体特征提供了一种量化认知障碍老年人损伤程度的方法,并为针对降低跌倒风险的干预措施提供了潜在的方向。