• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具身认知的身体:实际和感知的可达空间中的可供性和语言。

Which body for embodied cognition? Affordance and language within actual and perceived reaching space.

机构信息

Laboratory of Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience and Imaging, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.010
PMID:22832214
Abstract

The mental representation of one's own body does not necessarily correspond to the physical body. For instance, a dissociation between perceived and actual reach-ability has been shown, that is, individuals perceive that they can reach objects that are out of grasp. We presented participants with 3D pictures of objects located at four different distances, namely near-reaching space, actual-reaching space, perceived-reaching space and non-reaching space. Immediately after they were presented with function, manipulation, observation or pointing verbs and were required to judge if the verb was compatible with the object. Participants were faster with function and manipulation verbs than with observation and pointing verbs. Strikingly, with both function and manipulation verbs participants were faster when objects were presented in actual than the perceived reaching space. These findings suggest that our knowledge of the world is implicitly built online through behaviour, and is not necessarily reflected in explicit estimates or conscious representations.

摘要

个体对自身身体的心理表征不一定与实际身体相对应。例如,已经证明存在感知和实际可达范围之间的分离,也就是说,个体感知到他们可以够到无法触及的物体。我们向参与者展示了位于四个不同距离处的物体的 3D 图片,分别是近够范围、实际够到范围、感知够到范围和无法够到范围。在呈现给他们功能、操作、观察或指向动词后,要求他们判断动词是否与物体匹配。参与者在处理功能和操作动词时比处理观察和指向动词时更快。引人注目的是,对于功能和操作动词,当物体呈现于实际可达范围而非感知可达范围时,参与者的反应速度更快。这些发现表明,我们对世界的知识是通过行为在线隐含构建的,而不一定反映在明确的估计或有意识的表示中。

相似文献

1
Which body for embodied cognition? Affordance and language within actual and perceived reaching space.具身认知的身体:实际和感知的可达空间中的可供性和语言。
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
2
When objects are close to me: affordances in the peripersonal space.当物体靠近我时:近体空间中的可供使用性。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Apr;18(2):302-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0054-4.
3
Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space.近体物体及其名词
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
4
Neuroimaging reveals enhanced activation in a reach-selective brain area for objects located within participants' typical hand workspaces.神经影像学显示,对于位于参与者典型手工作空间内的物体,大脑中一个与伸手选择相关的区域表现出增强的激活。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3710-21. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Sep 21.
5
Handles lost in non-reachable space.无法触及空间中的手柄。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;229(2):197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3607-0. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
6
Invisible body illusion modulates interpersonal space.隐形身体错觉调节人际距离。
Sci Rep. 2017 May 2;7(1):1302. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01441-9.
7
Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin.神经源性离体体验与自体幻觉
Brain. 2004 Feb;127(Pt 2):243-58. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh040. Epub 2003 Dec 8.
8
Sentence comprehension and simulation of object temporary, canonical and stable affordances.句子理解以及对物体临时、规范和稳定可供性的模拟。
Brain Res. 2009 Feb 9;1253:117-28. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.064. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
9
The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory.视觉记忆中物体分类过程中抓握动作两个组成部分的增强。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2006 May;122(1):74-98. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.10.004. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
10
Sinistrals' upper hand: evidence for handedness differences in the representation of body space.左利手者的优势:身体空间表象中的利手差异的证据。
Brain Cogn. 2010 Apr;72(3):408-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Action verbs and demonstrative pronouns affect volumetric affordance activation.行为动词和指示代词会影响体积可供性激活。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Sep 2. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01783-0.
2
State and trait predictors of cognitive responses to acute stress and uncertainty.对急性应激和不确定性的认知反应的状态和特质预测因素。
Mil Psychol. 2024 Jun 27:1-8. doi: 10.1080/08995605.2024.2370708.
3
Sustainable materials: a linking bridge between material perception, affordance, and aesthetics.可持续材料:材料感知、功能可供性与美学之间的桥梁
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1307467. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1307467. eCollection 2023.
4
The elicitation of affordance depends on conceptual attributes: evidence from a virtual reality study.凸显功能的引出取决于概念属性:来自虚拟现实研究的证据。
Exp Brain Res. 2023 Jun;241(6):1513-1522. doi: 10.1007/s00221-023-06622-9. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
5
The influence of face mask on social spaces depends on the behavioral immune system.口罩对社交空间的影响取决于行为免疫系统。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Nov 11;16:991578. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.991578. eCollection 2022.
6
Foot-related/walking macro-affordances are implicitly activated and preferentially guided by the framing distance of the environmental layout.足部相关/行走的大动作可供使用被隐含激活,并优先由环境布局的取景距离引导。
Psychol Res. 2023 Apr;87(3):787-799. doi: 10.1007/s00426-022-01692-w. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
7
When Affective Relation Weighs More Than the Mug Handle: Investigating Affective Affordances.当情感关系比杯柄更重要时:探究情感可供性
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 21;11:1928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01928. eCollection 2020.
8
Re-enacting the Bodily Self on Stage: Embodied Cognition Meets Psychoanalysis.在舞台上重塑身体自我:具身认知与精神分析的相遇
Front Psychol. 2019 Apr 5;10:492. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00492. eCollection 2019.
9
Effect of Constrained Arm Posture on the Processing of Action Verbs.受限手臂姿势对动作动词加工的影响。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Feb 10;11:57. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00057. eCollection 2017.
10
Press to grasp: how action dynamics shape object categorization.按压以抓取:动作动力学如何塑造物体分类
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Mar;234(3):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4446-y. Epub 2015 Dec 8.