• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按压以抓取:动作动力学如何塑造物体分类

Press to grasp: how action dynamics shape object categorization.

作者信息

Triberti Stefano, Repetto Claudia, Costantini Marcello, Riva Giuseppe, Sinigaglia Corrado

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Laboratory of Neuropsychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, University G. d'Annunzio, Chieti, Italy.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2016 Mar;234(3):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4446-y. Epub 2015 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00221-015-4446-y
PMID:26645308
Abstract

Action and object are deeply linked to each other. Not only can viewing an object influence an ongoing action, but motor representations of action can also influence visual categorization of objects. It is tempting to assume that this influence is effector-specific. However, there is indirect evidence suggesting that this influence may be related to the action goal and not just to the effector involved in achieving it. This paper aimed, for the first time, to tackle this issue directly. Participants were asked to categorize different objects in terms of the effector (e.g. hand or foot) typically used to act upon them. The task was delivered before and after a training session in which participants were instructed either just to press a pedal with their foot or to perform the same foot action with the goal of guiding an avatar's hand to grasp a small ball. Results showed that pressing a pedal to grasp a ball influenced how participants correctly identified graspable objects as hand-related ones, making their responses more uncertain than before the training. Just pressing a pedal did not have any similar effect. This is evidence that the influence of action on object categorization can be goal-related rather than effector-specific.

摘要

动作与物体紧密相连。不仅观察物体能影响正在进行的动作,而且动作的运动表征也会影响物体的视觉分类。人们很容易认为这种影响是效应器特异性的。然而,有间接证据表明,这种影响可能与动作目标有关,而不仅仅与实现该目标所涉及的效应器有关。本文首次旨在直接解决这个问题。要求参与者根据通常用于作用于不同物体的效应器(如手或脚)对其进行分类。该任务在一次训练课程前后进行,在训练课程中,参与者要么被指示只用脚踩踏板,要么以引导虚拟角色的手抓住一个小球为目标进行相同的脚部动作。结果表明,踩踏板抓球会影响参与者如何正确地将可抓握物体识别为与手相关的物体,使他们的反应比训练前更加不确定。仅仅踩踏板并没有任何类似的效果。这证明动作对物体分类的影响可能与目标有关,而不是效应器特异性的。

相似文献

1
Press to grasp: how action dynamics shape object categorization.按压以抓取:动作动力学如何塑造物体分类
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Mar;234(3):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4446-y. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
2
Infants' visual anticipation of object structure in grasp planning.婴儿在抓握规划中对物体结构的视觉预期。
Infant Behav Dev. 2008 Jan;31(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2007.05.004. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
3
Priming tool actions: Are real objects more effective primes than pictures?启动工具动作:真实物体比图片更能有效地启动吗?
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Apr;234(4):963-76. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4518-z. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
4
Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge.这能理解吗?让你的右手来评判。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Feb;93:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
5
Phase-Dependent Visual and Sensorimotor Integration of Features for Grasp Computations before and after Effector Specification.在效应器指定前后,特征的相依赖性视觉和感觉运动整合用于抓握计算。
J Neurosci. 2024 Aug 14;44(33):e2208232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2208-23.2024.
6
Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representations in the recognition of manipulable objects.解析可操作性物体识别中抓取和动作表示的贡献。
Exp Brain Res. 2012 Jul;220(1):71-7. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3116-6. Epub 2012 May 19.
7
Simultaneous recording of macaque premotor and primary motor cortex neuronal populations reveals different functional contributions to visuomotor grasp.对猕猴运动前区和初级运动皮层神经元群的同步记录揭示了对视觉运动抓握的不同功能贡献。
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;98(1):488-501. doi: 10.1152/jn.01094.2006. Epub 2007 Feb 28.
8
Change detection for real-world objects in perihand space.手部周围空间中现实世界物体的变化检测。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Oct;81(7):2365-2383. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01820-6.
9
The influence of complex action knowledge on representations of novel graspable objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.复杂动作知识对新型可抓握物体表征的影响:来自功能磁共振成像的证据。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2007 Nov;13(6):1009-20. doi: 10.1017/S1355617707071093.
10
Automatic grasp imitation following action observation affects estimation of intrinsic object properties.动作观察后自动的抓握模仿会影响对物体固有属性的估计。
Brain Res. 2008 Jul 7;1218:166-80. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.046. Epub 2008 Apr 27.

引用本文的文献

1
An Ecological Approach to Conceptual Thinking in Material Engagement.物质参与中概念性思维的生态方法。
Eur J Psychol. 2024 May 29;20(2):84-103. doi: 10.5964/ejop.13227. eCollection 2024 May.

本文引用的文献

1
The spatial alignment effect in near and far space: a kinematic study.近空间和远空间中的空间对齐效应:一项运动学研究。
Exp Brain Res. 2014 Jul;232(7):2431-8. doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-3943-8. Epub 2014 Apr 20.
2
Handles lost in non-reachable space.无法触及空间中的手柄。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Aug;229(2):197-202. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3607-0. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
3
Facilitation and interference in spatial and body reference frames.空间和身体参照系的促进和干扰。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Mar;225(1):119-31. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3353-8. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
4
The effects of rTMS over the primary motor cortex: the link between action and language.经颅磁刺激对初级运动皮层的影响:动作与语言之间的联系。
Neuropsychologia. 2013 Jan;51(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.11.001. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
5
Which body for embodied cognition? Affordance and language within actual and perceived reaching space.具身认知的身体:实际和感知的可达空间中的可供性和语言。
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Sep;21(3):1551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 23.
6
Grasping affordances with the other's hand: a TMS study.用他人的手感知可供使用的机会:一项 TMS 研究。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2013 Apr;8(4):455-9. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss017. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
7
Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space.近体物体及其名词
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3519-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
8
Hand in motion reveals mind in motion.手在动,显心智在动。
Front Psychol. 2011 Apr 20;2:59. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059. eCollection 2011.
9
Ready both to your and to my hands: mapping the action space of others.准备好你的手和我的手:绘制他人的动作空间。
PLoS One. 2011 Apr 4;6(4):e17923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017923.
10
Learning associations between action and perception: effects of incompatible training on body part and spatial priming.学习动作与感知之间的联系:不兼容训练对身体部位和空间启动的影响。
Brain Cogn. 2011 Jun;76(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.02.014. Epub 2011 Apr 8.