Suppr超能文献

设计流畅性重复的额前解剖特异性及其对行为变异额颞叶痴呆的诊断相关性。

The frontal-anatomic specificity of design fluency repetitions and their diagnostic relevance for behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143-1207, USA.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012 Sep;18(5):834-44. doi: 10.1017/S1355617712000604. Epub 2012 Jul 27.

Abstract

On tests of design fluency, an examinee draws as many different designs as possible in a specified time limit while avoiding repetition. The neuroanatomical substrates and diagnostic group differences of design fluency repetition errors and total correct scores were examined in 110 individuals diagnosed with dementia, 53 with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 37 neurologically healthy controls. The errors correlated significantly with volumes in the right and left orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), the right and left superior frontal gyrus, the right inferior frontal gyrus, and the right striatum, but did not correlate with volumes in any parietal or temporal lobe regions. Regression analyses indicated that the lateral OFC may be particularly crucial for preventing these errors, even after excluding patients with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) from the analysis. Total correct correlated more diffusely with volumes in the right and left frontal and parietal cortex, the right temporal cortex, and the right striatum and thalamus. Patients diagnosed with bvFTD made significantly more repetition errors than patients diagnosed with MCI, Alzheimer's disease, semantic dementia, progressive supranuclear palsy, or corticobasal syndrome. In contrast, total correct design scores did not differentiate the dementia patients. These results highlight the frontal-anatomic specificity of design fluency repetitions. In addition, the results indicate that the propensity to make these errors supports the diagnosis of bvFTD. (JINS, 2012, 18, 1-11).

摘要

在设计流畅性测试中,受测者在规定的时间内尽可能多地画出不同的设计,同时避免重复。本研究共纳入 110 名痴呆症患者、53 名轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者和 37 名神经健康对照者,检测了设计流畅性重复错误和总正确分数的神经解剖学基础和诊断组差异。错误与右侧和左侧眶额皮层(OFC)、右侧和左侧额上回、右侧额下回和右侧纹状体的体积显著相关,但与顶叶或颞叶任何区域的体积均不相关。回归分析表明,即使在排除行为变异额颞叶痴呆(bvFTD)患者后,外侧 OFC 可能对防止这些错误尤为关键。总正确与右侧和左侧额叶和顶叶皮层、右侧颞叶皮层以及右侧纹状体和丘脑的体积更广泛相关。与 MCI 患者相比,被诊断为 bvFTD 的患者犯的重复错误明显更多。相反,总正确的设计分数并不能区分痴呆症患者。这些结果突出了设计流畅性重复的额叶解剖特异性。此外,结果表明,犯这些错误的倾向支持 bvFTD 的诊断。(JINS,2012,18,1-11)。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Functions of the frontal lobes: relation to executive functions.额叶的功能:与执行功能的关系。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Sep;17(5):759-65. doi: 10.1017/S1355617711000695. Epub 2011 May 24.
5
Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants.原发性进行性失语症及其变体的分类。
Neurology. 2011 Mar 15;76(11):1006-14. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6. Epub 2011 Feb 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验