• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

过去十年英国降低血糖药物的处方模式:重点关注罗格列酮安全性警告的影响。

Prescribing pattern of glucose lowering drugs in the United Kingdom in the last decade: a focus on the effects of safety warnings about rosiglitazone.

机构信息

Department of Medical Informatics, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;75(3):861-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04401.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04401.x
PMID:22845019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3575953/
Abstract

AIM

In the last decade, new glucose lowering drugs (GLDs) have been launched, and also several warnings regarding their safety. The cardiovascular safety of thiazolidinediones (TZD) has been questioned. We analyzed the prescription pattern of GLDs from 2000 to November 2009 in the United Kingdom (UK) using the THIN database with special focus on the effects of the safety warnings about rosiglitazone issued in May 2007 and January 2008.

METHODS

Annual prevalence and incidence of GLD prescriptions were measured. For TZD, the monthly prevalence and incidence of prescription were calculated from May 2006 to January 2009. The switching pattern around the FDA alert and the characteristics of subjects starting treatment with TZD before and after the alerts were observed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of prescriptions of GLDs increased during the 10 year period, metformin increasing more than three times. Rosiglitazone prevalence showed an increased trend until May 2007, (2.3/1000 person-years) and decreased thereafter (January 2009: 1.1/1000 person-years). The use of pioglitazone increased surpassing rosiglitazone from April 2008 onwards. The incidence of rosiglitazone use decreased sharply after May 2007 (0.8/1000 person-years). The prevalence of use of other therapies remained rather stable from 2000 to 2007 but increased afterwards. After May 2007, rosiglitazone users were increasingly switched to pioglitazone. There was an increased proportion of new users of pioglitazone with cardiovascular risk after the alerts.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription of GLDs in the UK has increased in the last decade. For TZDs, it changed after May 2007 as well as the characteristics of the subjects treated with them.

摘要

目的

在过去十年中,新的降糖药物(GLD)已被推出,同时也有一些关于其安全性的警告。噻唑烷二酮类药物(TZD)的心血管安全性受到质疑。我们使用 THIN 数据库分析了 2000 年至 2009 年 11 月英国(UK)GLD 的处方模式,特别关注 2007 年 5 月和 2008 年 1 月发布的关于罗格列酮安全性警告的影响。

方法

测量 GLD 处方的年度流行率和发病率。对于 TZD,从 2006 年 5 月至 2009 年 1 月计算每月处方的流行率和发病率。观察 FDA 警告前后 TZD 开始治疗的转换模式和患者特征。

结果

在 10 年期间,GLD 处方的流行率增加,二甲双胍增加了三倍多。罗格列酮的流行趋势呈上升趋势,直到 2007 年 5 月(2.3/1000人年),此后下降(2009 年 1 月:1.1/1000 人年)。自 2008 年 4 月以来,吡格列酮的使用量超过了罗格列酮。罗格列酮的使用率在 2007 年 5 月后急剧下降(0.8/1000 人年)。2000 年至 2007 年期间,其他疗法的使用率相对稳定,但此后增加。2007 年 5 月后,罗格列酮使用者越来越多地转为吡格列酮。在警告后,新使用具有心血管风险的吡格列酮的患者比例增加。

结论

在过去十年中,英国 GLD 的处方量有所增加。对于 TZD,自 2007 年 5 月以来,其处方模式发生了变化,同时接受治疗的患者特征也发生了变化。

相似文献

1
Prescribing pattern of glucose lowering drugs in the United Kingdom in the last decade: a focus on the effects of safety warnings about rosiglitazone.过去十年英国降低血糖药物的处方模式:重点关注罗格列酮安全性警告的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2013 Mar;75(3):861-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2012.04401.x.
2
Geographic Variation in Rosiglitazone Use Surrounding FDA Warnings in the Department of Veterans Affairs.美国退伍军人事务部内围绕 FDA 警告的罗格列酮使用的地域差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Dec;21(12):1214-34. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2015.21.12.1214.
3
Prescribing of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone following safety signals: analysis of trends in dispensing patterns in the Netherlands from 1998 to 2008.rosiglitazone 和 pioglitazone 处方的安全性信号后:从 1998 年到 2008 年荷兰配药模式的趋势分析。
Drug Saf. 2012 Jun 1;35(6):471-80. doi: 10.2165/11596950-000000000-00000.
4
Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone utilization from January 2007 through May 2008 associated with five risk-warning events.2007年1月至2008年5月期间罗格列酮和吡格列酮的使用与五项风险警示事件相关。
J Manag Care Pharm. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(6):523-31. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2008.14.6.523.
5
Changes and predictors for change to thiazolidinedione prescribing in UK primary care following the rosiglitazone safety warning.英国初级保健中罗格列酮安全性警告后噻唑烷二酮处方改变及其影响因素。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 May;65(5):586-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02648.x.
6
Comment on: prescribing of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone following safety signals analysis of trends in dispensing patterns in The Netherlands from 1998 to 2008.评论:关于1998年至2008年荷兰配药模式趋势的安全信号分析后罗格列酮和吡格列酮的处方情况
Drug Saf. 2014 Dec;37(12):1069-70. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0227-y.
7
Antidiabetic prescribing trends and predictors of thiazolidinedione discontinuation following the 2007 rosiglitazone safety alert.2007 年罗格列酮安全性警示后噻唑烷二酮类药物停药的抗糖尿病药物处方趋势和预测因素。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;93(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.02.035. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
8
Hospitalised hip fracture risk with rosiglitazone and pioglitazone use compared with other glucose-lowering drugs.与其他降血糖药物相比,使用罗格列酮和吡格列酮导致住院髋部骨折的风险。
Diabetologia. 2012 Nov;55(11):2929-37. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2668-0. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
9
Author's reply to Carracedo-Martínez E comment on: "prescribing of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone following safety signals: analysis of trends in dispensing patterns in The Netherlands from 1998 to 2008".作者对卡拉斯多 - 马丁内斯E对《罗格列酮和吡格列酮安全信号发布后的处方情况:1998年至2008年荷兰配药模式趋势分析》的评论的回复
Drug Saf. 2014 Dec;37(12):1071. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0228-x.
10
Association between longer therapy with thiazolidinediones and risk of bladder cancer: a cohort study.噻唑烷二酮类药物治疗时间延长与膀胱癌风险的关系:一项队列研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Sep 19;104(18):1411-21. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs328. Epub 2012 Aug 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating the Potential of Prevalent New User Design as an Alternative When New User Design is Impractical.当新用户设计不切实际时,评估流行的新用户设计作为替代方案的潜力。
Pragmat Obs Res. 2025 Jul 31;16:155-168. doi: 10.2147/POR.S517514. eCollection 2025.
2
Mixed Impact of Direct Healthcare Professional Communications When Considering Proximal Outcomes and the Targeted Population: A Systematic Review.考虑近端结局和目标人群时直接医疗专业人员沟通的混合影响:一项系统评价
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Mar;34(3):e70135. doi: 10.1002/pds.70135.
3
Identification of ferroptosis-related genes in type 2 diabetes mellitus based on machine learning.基于机器学习的 2 型糖尿病铁死亡相关基因的鉴定。
Immun Inflamm Dis. 2023 Oct;11(10):e1036. doi: 10.1002/iid3.1036.
4
Thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, meglitinides, sulfonylureas, and hepatocellular carcinoma risk: A meta-analysis.噻唑烷二酮类、α-葡萄糖苷酶抑制剂、米格列奈、磺酰脲类药物和肝细胞癌风险:一项荟萃分析。
Metabolism. 2021 Jul;120:154780. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2021.154780. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Real World Use of Antidiabetic Drugs in the Years 2011-2017: A Population-Based Study from Southern Italy.2011-2017 年抗糖尿病药物的真实世界应用:来自意大利南部的一项基于人群的研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9514. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249514.
6
Regulatory post-market drug safety advisories on cardiac harm: A comparison of four national regulatory agencies.监管后市场药物安全性通告中的心脏损害:四个国家监管机构的比较。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00680. doi: 10.1002/prp2.680.
7
Impact of risk minimisation measures on the use of strontium ranelate in Europe: a multi-national cohort study in 5 EU countries by the EU-ADR Alliance.风险最小化措施对锶雷尼酸酯在欧洲使用的影响:欧盟-ADR 联盟在 5 个欧盟国家开展的多国队列研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2020 Apr;31(4):721-755. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05181-6. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
8
Impact of medicines regulatory risk communications in the UK on prescribing and clinical outcomes: Systematic review, time series analysis and meta-analysis.英国药品监管风险沟通对处方和临床结果的影响:系统评价、时间序列分析和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;86(4):698-710. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14104. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
Study Design and Evaluation of Risk Minimization Measures: A Review of Studies Submitted to the European Medicines Agency for Cardiovascular, Endocrinology, and Metabolic Drugs.研究设计和风险最小化措施评估:对向欧洲药品管理局提交的心血管、内分泌和代谢药物研究的综述。
Drug Saf. 2018 Feb;41(2):191-202. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0604-4.
10
Measuring the impact of medicines regulatory interventions - Systematic review and methodological considerations.衡量药品监管干预措施的影响——系统评价及方法学考虑。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;84(3):419-433. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13469. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Prescribing of rosiglitazone and pioglitazone following safety signals: analysis of trends in dispensing patterns in the Netherlands from 1998 to 2008.rosiglitazone 和 pioglitazone 处方的安全性信号后:从 1998 年到 2008 年荷兰配药模式的趋势分析。
Drug Saf. 2012 Jun 1;35(6):471-80. doi: 10.2165/11596950-000000000-00000.
2
Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2型糖尿病高血糖管理:以患者为中心的方法。美国糖尿病协会(ADA)和欧洲糖尿病研究协会(EASD)的立场声明。
Diabetologia. 2012 Jun;55(6):1577-96. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2534-0. Epub 2012 Apr 20.
3
Changes and predictors for change to thiazolidinedione prescribing in UK primary care following the rosiglitazone safety warning.英国初级保健中罗格列酮安全性警告后噻唑烷二酮处方改变及其影响因素。
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 May;65(5):586-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2011.02648.x.
4
Antidiabetic prescribing trends and predictors of thiazolidinedione discontinuation following the 2007 rosiglitazone safety alert.2007 年罗格列酮安全性警示后噻唑烷二酮类药物停药的抗糖尿病药物处方趋势和预测因素。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2011 Jul;93(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.02.035. Epub 2011 Mar 25.
5
Combining electronic healthcare databases in Europe to allow for large-scale drug safety monitoring: the EU-ADR Project.结合欧洲的电子医疗数据库以实现大规模药物安全监测:EU-ADR 项目。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Jan;20(1):1-11. doi: 10.1002/pds.2053. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
6
Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization.Cytoscape 2.8:新的数据集成和网络可视化功能。
Bioinformatics. 2011 Feb 1;27(3):431-2. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675. Epub 2010 Dec 12.
7
Impact of thiazolidinedione safety warnings on medication use patterns and glycemic control among veterans with diabetes mellitus.噻唑烷二酮类药物安全性警示对糖尿病退伍军人用药模式和血糖控制的影响。
J Diabetes Complications. 2011 May-Jun;25(3):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
8
Temporal trends in anti-diabetes drug use in TRICARE following safety warnings in 2007 about rosiglitazone.2007 年罗格列酮的安全性警告发布后,TRICARE 中抗糖尿病药物使用的时间趋势。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Nov;18(11):1048-52. doi: 10.1002/pds.1819.
9
Trends in the prescription of anti-diabetic medications in the United Kingdom: a population-based analysis.英国抗糖尿病药物处方趋势:基于人群的分析。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Oct;18(10):973-6. doi: 10.1002/pds.1802.
10
Medical management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.2 型糖尿病患者高血糖的医学管理:起始和调整治疗的共识算法:美国糖尿病协会和欧洲糖尿病研究协会的共识声明。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):193-203. doi: 10.2337/dc08-9025. Epub 2008 Oct 22.