Koinuma Takuma, Akazawa Manabu
Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Kiyose, Tokyo, Japan.
Center for Experiential Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
Pragmat Obs Res. 2025 Jul 31;16:155-168. doi: 10.2147/POR.S517514. eCollection 2025.
The New User Design can be applied if the target drug has not been administered for a specified period. Therefore, comparisons between drugs administered alone are easier to undertake than comparisons of drugs used in combination. Thus, assessing concomitant medications may be associated with several challenges, including limitations to the New User Design. One such limitation is performing analyses that consider the history of administration of drugs of the same class. In the present study, we considered the limitations of the New User Design and proposed solutions based on the potential of the Prevalent New User Design.
Using the Japan Medical Data Center database (JMDC), patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus who received sulfonylureas (SUs) between December 2009 and December 2010 with subsequent addition or switch to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4Is) were categorized into the SU+DPP4I group. The odds ratio (OR) was estimated using conditional logistic regression analysis. Using the "elapsed time" and "number of prescriptions" axes of the Prevalent New User Design, records from 1,426 and 1,342 individuals, respectively, were analyzed.
The hypoglycemia risk ORs were 1.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-9.00) for the "elapsed time" axis and 1.67 (95% CI 0.40-7.00) for the "number of prescriptions" axis. These findings are consistent with the results of a meta-analysis of previous randomized controlled trials.
Our findings suggest that the Prevalent New User Design can be effectively applied for real-world risk assessment scenarios; this design constitutes a potential alternative design to the New User Design. We adopted a Prevalent New User Design considering the patients' treatment history. However, there was a limitation in that we could not obtain information regarding the patients' perceptions of treatment prior to initiating therapy.
如果目标药物在特定时间段内未使用,则可应用新用户设计。因此,单独给药的药物之间的比较比联合使用的药物之间的比较更容易进行。因此,评估伴随用药可能会面临一些挑战,包括新用户设计的局限性。其中一个局限性是进行考虑同类药物用药史的分析。在本研究中,我们考虑了新用户设计的局限性,并基于现患新用户设计的潜力提出了解决方案。
利用日本医疗数据中心数据库(JMDC),将2009年12月至2010年12月期间接受磺脲类药物(SUs)治疗且随后加用或换用二肽基肽酶-4抑制剂(DPP4Is)的糖尿病患者分类为SU+DPP4I组。使用条件逻辑回归分析估计比值比(OR)。利用现患新用户设计的“经过时间”和“处方数量”轴,分别分析了1426人和1342人的记录。
“经过时间”轴的低血糖风险OR为1.50(95%置信区间[CI]0.25-9.00),“处方数量”轴的低血糖风险OR为1.67(95%CI 0.40-7.00)。这些发现与先前随机对照试验的荟萃分析结果一致。
我们的研究结果表明,现患新用户设计可有效应用于真实世界的风险评估场景;该设计构成了新用户设计的潜在替代设计。我们采用了考虑患者治疗史的现患新用户设计。然而,存在一个局限性,即我们无法获得患者在开始治疗前对治疗的看法的信息。