Department of Emergency Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Institute of Cardiopulmonary Cerebral Resuscitation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Institute of Cardiopulmonary Cerebral Resuscitation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Emergency Medicine, Taiping People's Hospital, Medical School of Jinan University, Dongguan, China.
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;32(1):50-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.043. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
The latest guidelines both increased the requirements of chest compression rate and depth during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), which may make it more difficult for the rescuer to provide high-quality chest compression. In this study, we investigated the quality of chest compressions during compression-only CPR under the latest 2010 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines (AHA 2010) and its effect on rescuer fatigue.
Eighty-six undergraduate volunteers were randomly assigned to perform CPR according to the 2005 AHA guidelines (AHA 2005) or AHA 2010. After the training course and theoretical examination of basic life support, eight min of compression-only CPR performance was assessed. The quality of chest compressions including rate and depth of compression was analyzed. The rescuer fatigue was evaluated by the changes of heart rate and blood lactate, and rating of perceived exertion.
Thirty-nine participants in the AHA 2005 group and 42 participants in the AHA 2010 group completed the study. Significantly greater mean chest compression depth and compression rate were both achieved in the AHA 2010 group than in the AHA 2005 group. And significantly greater rescuer fatigue was observed in the AHA 2010 group. In addition, the female in the AHA 2010 group could perform the compression rate required by the guidelines, however, significantly shallower compression depth and greater rescuer fatigue were observed when compared to the male.
The quality of chest compressions was significantly improved following the 2010 AHA guidelines, however, it's more difficult for the rescuer to meet the guidelines due to the increased fatigue of rescuer.
最新指南提高了心肺复苏(CPR)过程中胸外按压频率和深度的要求,这可能使施救者更难以提供高质量的胸外按压。在这项研究中,我们研究了在最新的 2010 年美国心脏协会(AHA)指南(AHA 2010)下单纯胸外按压心肺复苏时的胸外按压质量及其对施救者疲劳的影响。
86 名本科志愿者被随机分配按照 2005 年 AHA 指南(AHA 2005)或 AHA 2010 进行 CPR。在基础生命支持的培训课程和理论考试后,评估了 8 分钟的单纯胸外按压心肺复苏操作。分析了胸外按压的质量,包括按压频率和深度。通过心率和血乳酸的变化以及感知用力的评分来评估施救者的疲劳程度。
AHA 2005 组 39 名参与者和 AHA 2010 组 42 名参与者完成了研究。与 AHA 2005 组相比,AHA 2010 组的平均胸外按压深度和按压频率均显著增加。同时,AHA 2010 组的施救者疲劳程度显著更大。此外,与男性相比,AHA 2010 组的女性可以达到指南要求的按压频率,但观察到的按压深度明显较浅,施救者疲劳程度更大。
遵循 2010 年 AHA 指南后,胸外按压的质量显著提高,但由于施救者疲劳增加,更难以达到指南要求。